Serum Levels of MicroRNA-371a-3p (M371) Can Predict Absence or Presence of Vital Disease in Residual Masses After Chemotherapy of Metastatic Seminoma.
M371
biomarker
chemotherapy
metastases
microRNA
residual tumor
seminoma
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
04
03
2022
accepted:
11
04
2022
entrez:
23
5
2022
pubmed:
24
5
2022
medline:
24
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Radiological evaluation of postchemotherapy residual masses of metastatic seminoma is characterized by poor diagnostic accuracy. Serum levels of microRNA-371a-3p (M371) involve high specificity and sensitivity for the primary diagnosis of seminoma. We evaluated if M371 levels can indicate the presence of vital disease in postchemotherapy residual masses in patients with metastatic seminoma. Twenty-three seminoma patients (median age 52 years) with residual masses had posttreatment measurements of serum M371 levels (group A), fourteen of whom had measurements also beforehand. The posttreatment results were compared with the clinical outcome during follow-up. Eleven patients with complete remission after treatment of metastatic seminoma (group B) and 33 men with non-malignant testicular diseases (group C) served as controls. M371 serum levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR using miR-30b-5p as endogenous control. An evaluation was performed with descriptive statistical methods. Twenty-two patients of Group A had uneventful follow-up so far, twenty-one of whom had M371 level <5, and one other had a mildly elevated level below relative quantity (RQ) = 10. One patient with a level of RQ = 26.2 rapidly progressed. The median posttreatment M371 level of the non-progressing patients of group A is not significantly different from the median level of the control group with complete remission (B). Before treatment, the median M371 levels in groups A and B were 507.6 and 143.9, respectively. In both groups, significant drops in M371 levels resulted from treatment. Normal M371 serum levels at the time of completion of treatment of metastatic seminoma indicate the absence of vital seminoma in residual masses, while elevated levels >RQ = 10 predict the presence of disease. The optimal timing of M371 measurement after chemotherapy and the appropriate cutoff level still need to be determined. Based on the present results, measuring serum M371 levels involves the potential of a novel tool for assessing postchemotherapy residual masses of metastatic seminoma.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Radiological evaluation of postchemotherapy residual masses of metastatic seminoma is characterized by poor diagnostic accuracy. Serum levels of microRNA-371a-3p (M371) involve high specificity and sensitivity for the primary diagnosis of seminoma. We evaluated if M371 levels can indicate the presence of vital disease in postchemotherapy residual masses in patients with metastatic seminoma.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Twenty-three seminoma patients (median age 52 years) with residual masses had posttreatment measurements of serum M371 levels (group A), fourteen of whom had measurements also beforehand. The posttreatment results were compared with the clinical outcome during follow-up. Eleven patients with complete remission after treatment of metastatic seminoma (group B) and 33 men with non-malignant testicular diseases (group C) served as controls. M371 serum levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR using miR-30b-5p as endogenous control. An evaluation was performed with descriptive statistical methods.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Twenty-two patients of Group A had uneventful follow-up so far, twenty-one of whom had M371 level <5, and one other had a mildly elevated level below relative quantity (RQ) = 10. One patient with a level of RQ = 26.2 rapidly progressed. The median posttreatment M371 level of the non-progressing patients of group A is not significantly different from the median level of the control group with complete remission (B). Before treatment, the median M371 levels in groups A and B were 507.6 and 143.9, respectively. In both groups, significant drops in M371 levels resulted from treatment.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Normal M371 serum levels at the time of completion of treatment of metastatic seminoma indicate the absence of vital seminoma in residual masses, while elevated levels >RQ = 10 predict the presence of disease. The optimal timing of M371 measurement after chemotherapy and the appropriate cutoff level still need to be determined. Based on the present results, measuring serum M371 levels involves the potential of a novel tool for assessing postchemotherapy residual masses of metastatic seminoma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35600346
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.889624
pmc: PMC9121896
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
889624Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Dieckmann, Klemke, Grobelny, Radtke, Dralle-Filiz, Wülfing and Belge.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
K-PD and GB declare ownership shares of each 9.71% of mirdetect GmbH, Bremerhaven, Germany. AR is an employee of mirdetect, GmbH, Bremerhaven, Germany. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Eur Urol. 2008 Feb;53(2):260-72
pubmed: 18045770
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Dec;13(12):715-725
pubmed: 27754472
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Feb;14(2):454-60
pubmed: 8636757
Eur Urol. 2021 Oct;80(4):456-466
pubmed: 34175151
J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2126-8
pubmed: 12771733
World J Urol. 2021 Nov 15;:
pubmed: 34779882
Ann Oncol. 2012 Jan;23(1):59-64
pubmed: 21460378
Cells. 2019 Oct 08;8(10):
pubmed: 31597402
J Urol. 2002 Nov;168(5):1975-9
pubmed: 12394688
Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2022 Mar-Apr;19(2):178-193
pubmed: 35181587
Ann Oncol. 1997 Jan;8(1):37-40
pubmed: 9093705
Urol Int. 2021;105(3-4):181-191
pubmed: 33486494
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Dec;17(12):1529-1554
pubmed: 31805523
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;37(16):1412-1423
pubmed: 30875280
Ann Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;29(8):1658-1686
pubmed: 30113631
In Vivo. 2020 Jan-Feb;34(1):163-168
pubmed: 31882475
Urol Int. 2012;88(4):405-9
pubmed: 22507953
Urol Oncol. 2015 Jan;33(1):23.e15-23.e21
pubmed: 25454484
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Dec;4(6):995-1001
pubmed: 29428550
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 27;8(35):58037-58049
pubmed: 28938535
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2021 Jul;33(7):e315-e321
pubmed: 33608206
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 Apr;26:83-87
pubmed: 33997822
Eur Urol. 2017 Feb;71(2):213-220
pubmed: 27495845
J Urol. 2014 Nov;192(5):1397-402
pubmed: 24813309
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Sep 1;19(17):3740-4
pubmed: 11533096
Eur Urol. 2007 Feb;51(2):424-32
pubmed: 16911854
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2013 Mar;11(1):66-9
pubmed: 22981209
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2005 Oct;5(5):869-74
pubmed: 16221056
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):1054-68
pubmed: 26297604
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
pubmed: 11846609
Eur Urol. 2020 Feb;77(2):290-292
pubmed: 31699528
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):381-6
pubmed: 24094847
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Feb;147(2):435-443
pubmed: 33200255
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 4;:JCO1800210
pubmed: 30285559
J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):331-7
pubmed: 25046619
J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 10;39(14):1553-1562
pubmed: 33729863
Cells. 2019 Dec 14;8(12):
pubmed: 31847394
J Urol. 2018 Jul;200(1):126-135
pubmed: 29474847