Prevalence and Risk Factors for Sexually Transmitted Infections in Gay and Bisexual Prostate Cancer Survivors: Results From the

STD (sexually transmitted disease) homosexuality oncology risky health behaviors sexuality

Journal

Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 09 12 2021
accepted: 08 04 2022
entrez: 23 5 2022
pubmed: 24 5 2022
medline: 24 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Equitable cancer survivorship care for gay and bisexual male (GBM) prostate cancer survivors should be responsive to their sexual health needs. Rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are higher among GBM compared to heterosexual men across the lifespan. In addition, evidence suggests that GBM will use a variety of strategies to cope with sexual dysfunction that may increase risk for STIs. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of STIs following prostate cancer treatment among GBM and identify risk factors. In 2019, 401 GBM previously treated for prostate cancer were recruited into the Restore-2 Study. They completed a baseline online questionnaire with items assessing STIs diagnosed since being treated for prostate cancer. Any STI diagnoses was regressed on demographic, clinical, and relationship related variables using binary logistic regression. Forty-five participants (11.4%) were diagnosed with an STI during or following their prostate cancer treatment. The mostly commonly diagnosed STI was syphilis (4.3%), followed by gonorrhoea (2.8%), and chlamydia (2.5%). Four participants were infected with HIV following their prostate cancer treatment. Independent risk factors for STI diagnosis included time since prostate cancer diagnosis (aOR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.10-1.26), nonmonogamous sexual relationship (aOR = 11.23; 95% CI: 2.11-59.73), better sexual function (aOR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.04), penile injection treatment (aOR = 3.28; 95% CI: 1.48-7.29), and multiple sex partners (aOR = 5.57; 95% CI: 1.64-18.96). GBM prostate cancer survivors are at risk for STIs. Culturally responsive STI prevention should be incorporated into cancer survivorship plans, particularly as men are treated for and regain sexual function over time.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Equitable cancer survivorship care for gay and bisexual male (GBM) prostate cancer survivors should be responsive to their sexual health needs. Rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are higher among GBM compared to heterosexual men across the lifespan. In addition, evidence suggests that GBM will use a variety of strategies to cope with sexual dysfunction that may increase risk for STIs. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of STIs following prostate cancer treatment among GBM and identify risk factors.
Methods UNASSIGNED
In 2019, 401 GBM previously treated for prostate cancer were recruited into the Restore-2 Study. They completed a baseline online questionnaire with items assessing STIs diagnosed since being treated for prostate cancer. Any STI diagnoses was regressed on demographic, clinical, and relationship related variables using binary logistic regression.
Results UNASSIGNED
Forty-five participants (11.4%) were diagnosed with an STI during or following their prostate cancer treatment. The mostly commonly diagnosed STI was syphilis (4.3%), followed by gonorrhoea (2.8%), and chlamydia (2.5%). Four participants were infected with HIV following their prostate cancer treatment. Independent risk factors for STI diagnosis included time since prostate cancer diagnosis (aOR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.10-1.26), nonmonogamous sexual relationship (aOR = 11.23; 95% CI: 2.11-59.73), better sexual function (aOR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.04), penile injection treatment (aOR = 3.28; 95% CI: 1.48-7.29), and multiple sex partners (aOR = 5.57; 95% CI: 1.64-18.96).
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
GBM prostate cancer survivors are at risk for STIs. Culturally responsive STI prevention should be incorporated into cancer survivorship plans, particularly as men are treated for and regain sexual function over time.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35600390
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.832508
pmc: PMC9117614
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

832508

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Wheldon, Polter, Rosser, Bates, Haggart, Wright, Mitteldorf, Ross, Konety, Kohli, Talley, West and Tatum.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):899-905
pubmed: 11113727
Vaccine. 2013 Dec 31;31 Suppl 7:H1-31
pubmed: 24332295
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 22;11(7):e0159309
pubmed: 27447943

Auteurs

Christopher W Wheldon (CW)

Cancer Health Equity, Education and Research Lab, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Elizabeth Polter (E)

Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

B R Simon Rosser (BRS)

Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Alex J Bates (AJ)

Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Ryan Haggart (R)

Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Morgan Wright (M)

Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Darryl Mitteldorf (D)

Malecare Cancer Support, New York, NY, United States.

Michael W Ross (MW)

Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Badrinath R Konety (BR)

Department of Urology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, United States.

Nidhi Kohli (N)

Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Kristine M C Talley (KMC)

Adult and Geriatric Health, University of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

William West (W)

Department of Writing Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Alexander K Tatum (AK)

Department of Counseling Psychology, Social Psychology, and Counseling, College of Health, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, United States.

Classifications MeSH