Tracking the nature and trajectory of social support in Facebook mutual aid groups during the COVID-19 pandemic.
COVID-19
Community solidarity
Mutual aid
Online groups
Social media
Social support
Journal
International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR
ISSN: 2212-4209
Titre abrégé: Int J Disaster Risk Reduct
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613236
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jun 2022
15 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
04
10
2021
revised:
21
02
2022
accepted:
10
05
2022
entrez:
23
5
2022
pubmed:
24
5
2022
medline:
24
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, thousands of mutual aid groups were established on social media and operated as platforms through which people could offer or request social support. Considering the importance of Facebook mutual aid groups during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom but also the lack of empirical research regarding the trajectories and types of social support rendered available through the groups, our aims in this paper are threefold; first, to examine the trajectory of social support-related activity during the period between March-December 2020; second, to compare offers and requests of support during the peaks of the first and second waves; third to provide a rich analysis of the types of social support that were offered or requested through the online mutual aid groups. Quantitative findings suggest that online social support activity declined soon after the peak of the first pandemic wave and, at least in Facebook mutual aid groups, did not reach the levels observed during the first wave. Also, the number of offers of support during the first wave was higher compared to offers during the second wave, and similar was the case for requests for support. Additionally, offers for support were higher compared to requests for support during both the first and second waves. Finally, qualitative analysis showed that people used the Facebook mutual aid groups to offer and request various types of practical, emotional, and informational support. Limitations as well as implications of our study are considered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35601394
doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103043
pii: S2212-4209(22)00262-X
pmc: PMC9106594
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
103043Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2021 Dec;21(1):1082-1112
pubmed: 34899075
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 28;21(1):1470
pubmed: 34320922
Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 04;7:141
pubmed: 31214561
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;32(3):521-535
pubmed: 34230792
BJPsych Open. 2020 Dec 07;7(1):e11
pubmed: 33283693
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Sep;71(3):498-511
pubmed: 8831159
BMJ. 2021 Mar 31;372:n608
pubmed: 33789843
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Mar;64(3):395-408
pubmed: 8468668
BMJ. 2021 Mar 10;372:n625
pubmed: 33692026
Health Soc Care Community. 2013 Jul;21(4):391-401
pubmed: 23445336
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Mar;41(1-2):127-50
pubmed: 18157631
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 9;15(10):e0239400
pubmed: 33035216