Short-term outcomes associated with temozolomide or PCV chemotherapy for 1p/19q-codeleted WHO grade 3 oligodendrogliomas: A national evaluation.
PCV
chemotherapy
grade 3
oligodendroglioma
temozolomide
Journal
Neuro-oncology practice
ISSN: 2054-2577
Titre abrégé: Neurooncol Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101640528
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
entrez:
23
5
2022
pubmed:
24
5
2022
medline:
24
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The optimal chemotherapy regimen between temozolomide and procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) remains uncertain for WHO grade 3 oligodendroglioma (Olig3) patients. We therefore investigated this question using national data. Patients diagnosed with radiotherapy-treated 1p/19q-codeleted Olig3 between 2010 and 2018 were identified from the National Cancer Database. The overall survival (OS) associated with first-line single-agent temozolomide vs multi-agent PCV was estimated by Kaplan-Meier techniques and evaluated by multivariable Cox regression. One thousand five hundred ninety-six radiotherapy-treated 1p/19q-codeleted Olig3 patients were identified: 88.6% (n = 1414) treated with temozolomide and 11.4% (n = 182) with PCV (from 5.4% in 2010 to 12.0% in 2018) in the first-line setting. The median follow-up was 35.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 20.7-60.6 months) with 63.3% of patients alive at the time of analysis. There was a significant difference in unadjusted OS between temozolomide (5-year OS 58.9%, 95%CI: 55.6-62.0) and PCV (5-year OS 65.1%, 95%CI: 54.8-73.5; In a national analysis of Olig3s, first-line PCV chemotherapy was associated with a slightly improved unadjusted short-term OS compared to temozolomide; but not following adjustment by patient age and extent of resection. There has been an increase in PCV utilization since 2010. These findings provide preliminary data while we await the definitive results from the CODEL trial.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The optimal chemotherapy regimen between temozolomide and procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) remains uncertain for WHO grade 3 oligodendroglioma (Olig3) patients. We therefore investigated this question using national data.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Patients diagnosed with radiotherapy-treated 1p/19q-codeleted Olig3 between 2010 and 2018 were identified from the National Cancer Database. The overall survival (OS) associated with first-line single-agent temozolomide vs multi-agent PCV was estimated by Kaplan-Meier techniques and evaluated by multivariable Cox regression.
Results
UNASSIGNED
One thousand five hundred ninety-six radiotherapy-treated 1p/19q-codeleted Olig3 patients were identified: 88.6% (n = 1414) treated with temozolomide and 11.4% (n = 182) with PCV (from 5.4% in 2010 to 12.0% in 2018) in the first-line setting. The median follow-up was 35.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 20.7-60.6 months) with 63.3% of patients alive at the time of analysis. There was a significant difference in unadjusted OS between temozolomide (5-year OS 58.9%, 95%CI: 55.6-62.0) and PCV (5-year OS 65.1%, 95%CI: 54.8-73.5;
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
In a national analysis of Olig3s, first-line PCV chemotherapy was associated with a slightly improved unadjusted short-term OS compared to temozolomide; but not following adjustment by patient age and extent of resection. There has been an increase in PCV utilization since 2010. These findings provide preliminary data while we await the definitive results from the CODEL trial.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35601971
doi: 10.1093/nop/npac004
pii: npac004
pmc: PMC9113268
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
201-207Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Oct 7;90(19):1473-9
pubmed: 9776413
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Mar 25;23(3):457-467
pubmed: 32678879
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):e315-e329
pubmed: 28483413
JAMA. 2013 Nov 6;310(17):1842-50
pubmed: 24193082
Cancer Immunol Res. 2018 Sep;6(9):1039-1045
pubmed: 30002157
J Neurooncol. 2006 Sep;79(2):153-7
pubmed: 16855865
J Neurooncol. 2015 Mar;122(1):111-9
pubmed: 25534576
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 1;24(16):2563-9
pubmed: 16735709
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 20;31(3):344-50
pubmed: 23071237
J Neurooncol. 2009 Mar;92(1):57-63
pubmed: 19011763
Neuro Oncol. 2016 Nov;18(11):1529-1537
pubmed: 27370396
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Mar 25;23(3):347-349
pubmed: 33560350
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 20;31(3):337-43
pubmed: 23071247
Neuro Oncol. 2020 Oct 30;22(12 Suppl 2):iv1-iv96
pubmed: 33123732
Nature. 2019 Dec;576(7785):112-120
pubmed: 31748746
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 10;27(35):5874-80
pubmed: 19901110
Neuro Oncol. 2020 Mar 5;22(3):369-380
pubmed: 31538193
Neuro Oncol. 2012 Jun;14(6):761-7
pubmed: 22661585
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):1722-1728
pubmed: 28241198
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1604-1612
pubmed: 30737668
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):1-3
pubmed: 30590836
Nature. 2020 Apr;580(7804):517-523
pubmed: 32322066
Neuro Oncol. 2011 Jun;13(6):649-59
pubmed: 21636710
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-1251
pubmed: 34185076
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 15;25(8):2656-2663
pubmed: 30635340
Neuro Oncol. 2004 Oct;6(4):300-5
pubmed: 15494097
Neurooncol Pract. 2019 Jan;6(1):17-21
pubmed: 31386006
J Neurooncol. 2011 Feb;101(3):457-62
pubmed: 20556480
Curr Opin Neurol. 2020 Dec;33(6):707-715
pubmed: 33027142