Dual-energy three-compartment breast imaging for compositional biomarkers to improve detection of malignant lesions.

Breast cancer Cancer imaging

Journal

Communications medicine
ISSN: 2730-664X
Titre abrégé: Commun Med (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918250414506676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 04 03 2021
accepted: 26 07 2021
entrez: 23 5 2022
pubmed: 24 5 2022
medline: 24 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

While breast imaging such as full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis have helped to reduced breast cancer mortality, issues with low specificity exist resulting in unnecessary biopsies. The fundamental information used in diagnostic decisions are primarily based in lesion morphology. We explore a dual-energy compositional breast imaging technique known as three-compartment breast (3CB) to show how the addition of compositional information improves malignancy detection. Women who presented with Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) diagnostic categories 4 or 5 and who were scheduled for breast biopsies were consecutively recruited for both standard mammography and 3CB imaging. Computer-aided detection (CAD) software was used to assign a morphology-based prediction of malignancy for all biopsied lesions. Compositional signatures for all lesions were calculated using 3CB imaging and a neural network evaluated CAD predictions with composition to predict a new probability of malignancy. CAD and neural network predictions were compared to the biopsy pathology. The addition of 3CB compositional information to CAD improves malignancy predictions resulting in an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.81 (confidence interval (CI) of 0.74-0.88) on a held-out test set, while CAD software alone achieves an AUC of 0.69 (CI 0.60-0.78). We also identify that invasive breast cancers have a unique compositional signature characterized by reduced lipid content and increased water and protein content when compared to surrounding tissues. Clinically, 3CB may potentially provide increased accuracy in predicting malignancy and a feasible avenue to explore compositional breast imaging biomarkers.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
While breast imaging such as full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis have helped to reduced breast cancer mortality, issues with low specificity exist resulting in unnecessary biopsies. The fundamental information used in diagnostic decisions are primarily based in lesion morphology. We explore a dual-energy compositional breast imaging technique known as three-compartment breast (3CB) to show how the addition of compositional information improves malignancy detection.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Women who presented with Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) diagnostic categories 4 or 5 and who were scheduled for breast biopsies were consecutively recruited for both standard mammography and 3CB imaging. Computer-aided detection (CAD) software was used to assign a morphology-based prediction of malignancy for all biopsied lesions. Compositional signatures for all lesions were calculated using 3CB imaging and a neural network evaluated CAD predictions with composition to predict a new probability of malignancy. CAD and neural network predictions were compared to the biopsy pathology.
Results UNASSIGNED
The addition of 3CB compositional information to CAD improves malignancy predictions resulting in an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.81 (confidence interval (CI) of 0.74-0.88) on a held-out test set, while CAD software alone achieves an AUC of 0.69 (CI 0.60-0.78). We also identify that invasive breast cancers have a unique compositional signature characterized by reduced lipid content and increased water and protein content when compared to surrounding tissues.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Clinically, 3CB may potentially provide increased accuracy in predicting malignancy and a feasible avenue to explore compositional breast imaging biomarkers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35602210
doi: 10.1038/s43856-021-00024-0
pii: 24
pmc: PMC9053198
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

29

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P01 CA154292
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsK.D. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: receives royalties from Hologic. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. M.G. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities related to the present article: is a stockholder in R2/Hologic; is a co-founder in Quantitative Insights (now advisor to Qlarity Imaging); receives royalties from Hologic, GE Medical Systems, MEDIAN Technologies, Riverain Medical, Mitsubishi, and Toshiba; receives royalties through institution is a licensee on patents. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. J.S. Activities related to the present article: in kind equipment support from Hologic and iCAD. Activities not related to the present article: investigator-initiated grant from Hologic. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. All other authors have no competing interests to declare.

Références

Radiol Artif Intell. 2019 Jul 31;1(4):e180096
pubmed: 32076660
Radiology. 2001 Sep;220(3):787-94
pubmed: 11526283
J Biomed Opt. 2006 Jul-Aug;11(4):044005
pubmed: 16965162
Med Phys. 2009 Dec;36(12):5525-36
pubmed: 20095265
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Dec 7;53(23):6713-27
pubmed: 18997265
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1828-37
pubmed: 26414882
Nat Rev Cancer. 2007 Oct;7(10):763-77
pubmed: 17882277
Radiology. 1998 Aug;208(2):477-83
pubmed: 9680579
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011792
pubmed: 32721031
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Jan;69(1):34-42
pubmed: 18790584
Acad Radiol. 2000 Dec;7(12):1077-84
pubmed: 11131052
Radiology. 2019 Jul;292(1):1-14
pubmed: 31084476
Radiology. 2019 Mar;290(3):621-628
pubmed: 30526359
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):493-502
pubmed: 22007043
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018 Feb;39(1):70-79
pubmed: 29317041
Stat Med. 2008 Jan 30;27(2):157-72; discussion 207-12
pubmed: 17569110
Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;38(4):725-40
pubmed: 10943274
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Apr;206(4):883-90
pubmed: 26866649
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec 10;34(35):4197-4202
pubmed: 27903158
Med Phys. 2010 Jan;37(1):164-74
pubmed: 20175478
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013 Oct;1831(10):1509-17
pubmed: 23562840
Breast. 2016 Aug;28:13-9
pubmed: 27161411
J Med Screen. 2012;19 Suppl 1:14-25
pubmed: 22972807
Radiology. 2017 Apr;283(1):49-58
pubmed: 27918707
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Aug;7(8):1355-64
pubmed: 22679181
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 25;8(17):29487-29500
pubmed: 28412757
Med Phys. 2014 Mar;41(3):031915
pubmed: 24593733
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1615-34
pubmed: 26501537
Radiology. 2008 Jan;246(1):116-24
pubmed: 18024435
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96
pubmed: 26757170
Cancer. 2014 Sep 1;120(17):2649-56
pubmed: 24840597
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 31;10:428
pubmed: 32296646
Cancer. 2011 Feb 15;117(4):714-22
pubmed: 20882563
Med Phys. 2008 Dec;35(12):5799-820
pubmed: 19175137

Auteurs

Lambert T Leong (LT)

Department of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI USA.
Department Molecular Bioscience and Bioengineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI USA.

Serghei Malkov (S)

Departments Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.

Karen Drukker (K)

Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.

Bethany L Niell (BL)

Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL USA.

Peter Sadowski (P)

Department of Information and Computer Science, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI USA.

Thomas Wolfgruber (T)

Department of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI USA.

Heather I Greenwood (HI)

Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.

Bonnie N Joe (BN)

Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.

Karla Kerlikowske (K)

Departments Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.

Maryellen L Giger (ML)

Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.

John A Shepherd (JA)

Department of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI USA.

Classifications MeSH