Locally developed models improve the accuracy of remotely assessed metrics as a rapid tool to classify sandy beach morphodynamics.
Brazilian coast
Coastal management
Conditional tree inference
Environmental modelling
Journal
PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
04
02
2022
accepted:
19
04
2022
entrez:
23
5
2022
pubmed:
24
5
2022
medline:
24
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Classification of beaches into morphodynamic states is a common approach in sandy beach studies, due to the influence of natural variables in ecological patterns and processes. The use of remote sensing for identifying beach type and monitoring changes has been commonly applied through multiple methods, which often involve expensive equipment and software processing of images. A previous study on the South African Coast developed a method to classify beaches using conditional tree inferences, based on beach morphological features estimated from public available satellite images, without the need for remote sensing processing, which allowed for a large-scale characterization. However, since the validation of this method has not been tested in other regions, its potential uses as a trans-scalar tool or dependence from local calibrations has not been evaluated. Here, we tested the validity of this method using a 200-km stretch of the Brazilian coast, encompassing a wide gradient of morphodynamic conditions. We also compared this locally derived model with the results that would be generated using the cut-off values established in the previous study. To this end, 87 beach sites were remotely assessed using an accessible software (i.e., Google Earth) and sampled for an
Identifiants
pubmed: 35602896
doi: 10.7717/peerj.13413
pii: 13413
pmc: PMC9121867
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
e13413Informations de copyright
©2022 Checon et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Guilherme N. Corte is an Academic Editor for PeerJ. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Ecology. 2010 Jun;91(6):1569-76
pubmed: 20583698
Mar Pollut Bull. 2006 Oct;52(10):1156-68
pubmed: 16650444
J Environ Manage. 2022 Apr 1;307:114594
pubmed: 35121366
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 28;8(1):3759
pubmed: 29491448
Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Dec;173(Pt A):112951
pubmed: 34534931
Curr Biol. 2017 Jun 5;27(11):R507-R510
pubmed: 28586688
J Fish Biol. 2014 May;84(5):1354-76
pubmed: 24684377
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 27;8(1):6641
pubmed: 29703960
Psychol Bull. 1968 Oct;70(4):213-20
pubmed: 19673146
Psychol Methods. 2007 Dec;12(4):399-413
pubmed: 18179351
Environ Int. 2017 May;102:165-176
pubmed: 28284818
Mar Pollut Bull. 2016 Jun 15;107(1):125-135
pubmed: 27103425
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40468
pubmed: 22792340
Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Nov;172:112809
pubmed: 34365157
Ecology. 2007 Nov;88(11):2783-92
pubmed: 18051647
Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Mar;164:111997
pubmed: 33485018