Impact of roadside burning on genetic diversity in a high-biomass invasive grass.
adaptation
asexual reproduction
fire ecology
fire management
invasive plants
landscape genomics
rapid adaptation
single‐nucleotide polymorphisms
Journal
Evolutionary applications
ISSN: 1752-4571
Titre abrégé: Evol Appl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101461828
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
received:
28
07
2021
revised:
06
12
2021
accepted:
23
02
2022
entrez:
23
5
2022
pubmed:
24
5
2022
medline:
24
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The invasive grass-fire cycle is a widely documented feedback phenomenon in which invasive grasses increase vegetation flammability and fire frequency, resulting in further invasion and compounded effects on fire regimes. Few studies have examined the role of short-term adaptation in driving the invasive grass-fire cycle, despite invasive species often thriving after introduction to new environments. We used a replicated (nine locations), paired sampling design (burn vs unburnt sites) to test the hypothesis that roadside burning increases genetic diversity and thus adaptive potential in the invasive, high-biomass grass
Identifiants
pubmed: 35603028
doi: 10.1111/eva.13369
pii: EVA13369
pmc: PMC9108304
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
790-803Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
New Phytol. 2012 Jan;193(1):18-23
pubmed: 22039968
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Apr;29(4):233-42
pubmed: 24636862
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 15;108(46):18743-7
pubmed: 22065739
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Jul;30(7):1687-99
pubmed: 23543094
PLoS One. 2013 May 14;8(5):e59144
pubmed: 23690917
Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct 26;10(23):12745-12763
pubmed: 33304491
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51523
pubmed: 23227267
Biol Lett. 2014 Feb 12;10(2):20131082
pubmed: 24522633
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 16;110(16):6442-7
pubmed: 23559374
Evol Appl. 2022 Mar 27;15(5):790-803
pubmed: 35603028
New Phytol. 2019 Feb;221(3):1424-1433
pubmed: 30216446
Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 15;28(24):3326-8
pubmed: 23060615
Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Nov;113(8):1409-20
pubmed: 17033786
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):136-44
pubmed: 19178981
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 26;109(26):10287-92
pubmed: 22689979
PLoS One. 2011 May 04;6(5):e19379
pubmed: 21573248
Ecol Lett. 2021 Nov;24(11):2378-2393
pubmed: 34355467
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 19;116(47):23594-23599
pubmed: 31685633
Ecol Evol. 2014 Nov;4(21):4185-94
pubmed: 25505543
Science. 2020 Nov 20;370(6519):
pubmed: 33214246
Genetics. 2003 Aug;164(4):1635-44
pubmed: 12930767
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Jan;17(1):67-77
pubmed: 27601374
Mol Ecol. 2014 Mar;23(5):1213-23
pubmed: 24433213
Ecol Evol. 2020 Sep 01;10(19):10619-10632
pubmed: 33072284
Nat Commun. 2018 May 30;9(1):2131
pubmed: 29849023
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Nov;28(11):670-9
pubmed: 24054910
Mol Biol Evol. 1998 May;15(5):538-43
pubmed: 9580982
New Phytol. 2021 Apr;230(2):832-844
pubmed: 33155275
Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Jun;13(6):288-94
pubmed: 18467157
Mol Ecol. 2021 Apr;30(8):1806-1822
pubmed: 33629449
Mol Ecol. 2014 Apr;23(8):2006-19
pubmed: 24611968
Genetics. 2003 Mar;163(3):1153-67
pubmed: 12663552
Genetics. 2014 Jun;197(2):573-89
pubmed: 24700103
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Nov 04;5:590
pubmed: 25414710
Evolution. 2010 Dec;64(12):3511-24
pubmed: 20561051
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;888:67-89
pubmed: 22665276
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 25;117(8):4218-4227
pubmed: 32034102
Trends Plant Sci. 2011 Aug;16(8):406-11
pubmed: 21571573
New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(1):614-627
pubmed: 30367474
Ann Bot. 2017 Apr 01;119(6):1061-1072
pubmed: 28159988
New Phytol. 2014 Oct;204(1):55-65
pubmed: 25298997
Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Sep;31(9):2483-95
pubmed: 24899666
New Phytol. 2015 Sep;207(4):953-67
pubmed: 25904408