Nasoseptal flap and rigid reconstruction in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgeries: The longitudinal experience of a single center.

endoscopic endonasal meningioma meningitis nasoseptal flap reconstruction skull base defects

Journal

Ear, nose, & throat journal
ISSN: 1942-7522
Titre abrégé: Ear Nose Throat J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7701817

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 May 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 24 5 2022
medline: 24 5 2022
entrez: 23 5 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Recently, endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) have been used for skull base defect reconstruction surgeries. The nasoseptal flap (NSF), a vascular pedicled flap, was introduced to decrease postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. This study aimed to outline the authors' institutional experience using NSF and rigid implants in anterior skull base defect reconstruction surgeries following EEA. A retrospective cohort review of patients who underwent NSF reconstruction following EEA in the Otorhinolaryngology and Neurosurgery Departments at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from January 2015 to May 2021, divided into 2 time periods according to the reconstruction technique. Out of the 106 patients who underwent EEA, 77 underwent NSF reconstruction. The majority had expanded EEA (94.8%). The mean age was 40.21 ± 17.7 years, and the female gender represented 61% of the sample. More than half of the sample underwent right NSF (57.1%). Meningioma was the most common diagnosis (45.5%). The clivus was the most frequent site of lesions (23.4%). The overall rate of postoperative CSF leakage and lumbar drainage (LD) insertion was 15.6% and 51.9%, respectively. The duration of LD was a median of four days. The overall failure rate was 13%, declining from 20% in the first period to 5.4% in the second period. Rigid implants were used significantly more in the first period than in the second period (67.5% versus 16.2%, In the authors' experience, there has been an overt decline in failure rates and complications of EEA over the last three years due to increased experience among surgeons and a standardization of reconstruction techniques. Minimal reconstruction may provide satisfactory results by decreasing the use of rigid implants. An endoscopic endonasal approach with an NSF for anterior skull base defect reconstruction is considered a safe procedure with no significant difference between the sides of the flap.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Recently, endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) have been used for skull base defect reconstruction surgeries. The nasoseptal flap (NSF), a vascular pedicled flap, was introduced to decrease postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage.
PURPOSES OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to outline the authors' institutional experience using NSF and rigid implants in anterior skull base defect reconstruction surgeries following EEA.
DESIGN METHODS
A retrospective cohort review of patients who underwent NSF reconstruction following EEA in the Otorhinolaryngology and Neurosurgery Departments at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from January 2015 to May 2021, divided into 2 time periods according to the reconstruction technique.
RESULT RESULTS
Out of the 106 patients who underwent EEA, 77 underwent NSF reconstruction. The majority had expanded EEA (94.8%). The mean age was 40.21 ± 17.7 years, and the female gender represented 61% of the sample. More than half of the sample underwent right NSF (57.1%). Meningioma was the most common diagnosis (45.5%). The clivus was the most frequent site of lesions (23.4%). The overall rate of postoperative CSF leakage and lumbar drainage (LD) insertion was 15.6% and 51.9%, respectively. The duration of LD was a median of four days. The overall failure rate was 13%, declining from 20% in the first period to 5.4% in the second period. Rigid implants were used significantly more in the first period than in the second period (67.5% versus 16.2%,
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In the authors' experience, there has been an overt decline in failure rates and complications of EEA over the last three years due to increased experience among surgeons and a standardization of reconstruction techniques. Minimal reconstruction may provide satisfactory results by decreasing the use of rigid implants. An endoscopic endonasal approach with an NSF for anterior skull base defect reconstruction is considered a safe procedure with no significant difference between the sides of the flap.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35603535
doi: 10.1177/01455613221099483
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1455613221099483

Auteurs

Mohammad Alshareef (M)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Khamis Mushait General hospital - Khamis Mushait City, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, 191082King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Ahmad Alroqi (A)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, 191082King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Hussain Albaharna (H)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, 191082King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 48070Qatif Central Hospital - Qatif City, Saudi Arabia.

Ahmed Alsayed (A)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, 191082King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Saud Alromaih (S)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, 191082King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abdulaziz S Alrasheed (AS)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, 191082King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abdulrazag Ajlan (A)

Department of Neurosurgery, 191082College of Medicine King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Saad Alsaleh (S)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, 191082King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Classifications MeSH