Survival after neoadjuvant/induction combination immunotherapy vs combination platinum-based chemotherapy for locally advanced (Stage III) urothelial cancer.


Journal

International journal of cancer
ISSN: 1097-0215
Titre abrégé: Int J Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0042124

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Dec 2022
Historique:
revised: 22 04 2022
received: 13 02 2022
accepted: 26 04 2022
pubmed: 24 5 2022
medline: 18 10 2022
entrez: 23 5 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy and surgical resection, clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) remain poor. We compared neoadjuvant/induction platinum-based combination chemotherapy (NAIC) with combination immune checkpoint inhibition (cICI). We identified 602 patients who attended our outpatient bladder cancer clinic in 2018 to 2019. Patients were included if they received NAIC or cICI for cT3-4aN0M0 or cT1-4aN1-3M0 UC. NAIC consisted of cisplatin-based chemotherapy or gemcitabine-carboplatin in case of cisplatin-ineligibility. A subset of patients (cisplatin-ineligibility or refusal of NAIC) received ipilimumab plus nivolumab in the NABUCCO-trial (NCT03387761). Treatments were compared using the log-rank test and propensity score-weighted Cox regression models. We included 107 Stage III UC patients treated with NAIC (n = 83) or cICI (n = 24). NAIC was discontinued in 11 patients due to progression (n = 6; 7%) or toxicity (n = 5; 6%), while cICI was discontinued in 6 patients (25%) after 2 cycles due to toxicity (P = .205). After NAIC, patients had surgical resection (n = 50; 60%), chemoradiation (n = 26; 30%), or no consolidating treatment due to progression (n = 5; 6%) or toxicity (n = 2; 2%). After cICI, all patients underwent resection. After resection (n = 74), complete pathological response (ypT0N0) was achieved in 11 (22%) NAIC-patients and 11 (46%) cICI-patients (P = .056). Median (IQR) follow-up was 26 (20-32) months. cICI was associated with superior progression-free survival (P = .003) and overall survival (P = .003) compared to NAIC. Our study showed superior survival in Stage III UC patients pretreated with cICI if compared to NAIC. Our findings provide a strong rationale for validation of cICI for locally advanced UC in a comparative phase-3 trial.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35603905
doi: 10.1002/ijc.34125
doi:

Substances chimiques

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors 0
Ipilimumab 0
Nivolumab 31YO63LBSN
Platinum 49DFR088MY
Carboplatin BG3F62OND5
Cisplatin Q20Q21Q62J

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase I Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2004-2011

Informations de copyright

© 2022 UICC.

Références

Nguyen DP, Thalmann GN. Contemporary update on neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14:348-358.
Witjes JA, Bruins HM, Cathomas R, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2020 guidelines. Eur Urol. 2021;79:82-104.
Hermans TJN, Fransen Van De Putte EE, Horenblas S, et al. Pathological downstaging and survival after induction chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for clinically node-positive bladder cancer-results of a nationwide population-based study. Eur J Cancer. 2016;69:1-8.
Powles T, Kockx M, Rodriguez-Vida A, et al. Clinical efficacy and biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant atezolizumab in operable urothelial carcinoma in the ABACUS trial. Nat Med. 2019;25:1706-1714.
Necchi A, Anichini A, Raggi D, et al. Pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant therapy before radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (PURE-01): an open-label, single-arm, phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:3353-3360.
Gao J, Navai N, Alhalabi O, et al. Neoadjuvant PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 blockade in patients with cisplatin-ineligible operable high-risk urothelial carcinoma. Nat Med. 2020;26:1845-1851.
van Dijk N, Gil-Jimenez A, Silina K, et al. Preoperative ipilimumab plus nivolumab in locoregionally advanced urothelial cancer: the NABUCCO trial. Nat Med. 2020;26:1839-1844.
Galsky MD, Hahn NM, Rosenberg J, et al. A consensus definition of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:211-214.
Voskuilen CS, van de Kamp MW, Schuring N, et al. Radiation with concurrent radiosensitizing capecitabine tablets and single-dose mitomycin-C for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a convenient alternative to 5-fluorouracil. Radiother Oncol. 2020;150:275-280.
Mertens LS, Meijer RP, Meinhardt W, et al. Occult lymph node metastases in patients with carcinoma invading bladder muscle: incidence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy vs after cystectomy alone. BJU Int. 2014;114:67-74.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Bladder Cancer [Internet]; 2021; https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/bladder.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2021.
Rosenblatt R, Sherif A, Rintala E, et al. Pathologic downstaging is a surrogate marker for efficacy and increased survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2012;61:1229-1238.
Sonpavde G, Goldman BH, Speights VO, et al. Quality of pathologic response and surgery correlate with survival for patients with completely resected bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2009;115:4104-4109.

Auteurs

Sarah M H Einerhand (SMH)

Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Nick van Dijk (N)

Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Jeroen van Dorp (J)

Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Jeantine M de Feijter (JM)

Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Maurits L van Montfoort (ML)

Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Maaike W van de Kamp (MW)

Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Eva E Schaake (EE)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Thierry N Boellaard (TN)

Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Kees Hendricksen (K)

Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Michiel S van der Heijden (MS)

Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Molecular Carcinogenesis, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Bas W G van Rhijn (BWG)

Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH