Mechanobiology of indirect bone fracture healing under conditions of relative stability: a narrative review for the practicing clinician.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 03 2022
10 03 2022
Historique:
received:
17
11
2021
accepted:
31
01
2022
entrez:
23
5
2022
pubmed:
24
5
2022
medline:
26
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mechanical influence on secondary fracture healing remains an incompletely understood phenomenon. This is of special importance in biological osteosynthesis, where stability is sacrificed for the sake of an optimal biological fracture environment. Under condition of relative stability, a wide range of biomechanical conditions can be achieved. Mechanobiology, which studies mechanical influences on biological systems has become a large, interdisciplinary field. The aim of this article is to present a comprehensive synthesis of the literature for the practicing clinician, with insights relevant to their practice of fracture care. The MEDLINE online database (Pubmed) was searched in September 2021 for relevant articles Results: The search provided 816 results, which were scanned by the first author by the title and abstract. With relevance to the research topic, 59 articles were chosen and read in detail. Another 70 articles were added by screening the references of relevant articles. A total of 129 articles were read and analysed Conclusions: Mechanical environment plays a crucial role in the fracture healing process. The definition of an optimal mechanical environment still evades us, due to the complexity of the problem. Computational models could replicate the complex mechanical environment of bone healing in humans but require detailed knowledge of mechano-transduction and material properties of healing tissues. The literature reminds us of the importance of adequate stiffness of constructs used under conditions of relative stability. Hopefully, further research in this field will result in not only empirical but more accurate and evidence-based assessments of osteosynthesis fixations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Mechanical influence on secondary fracture healing remains an incompletely understood phenomenon. This is of special importance in biological osteosynthesis, where stability is sacrificed for the sake of an optimal biological fracture environment. Under condition of relative stability, a wide range of biomechanical conditions can be achieved. Mechanobiology, which studies mechanical influences on biological systems has become a large, interdisciplinary field. The aim of this article is to present a comprehensive synthesis of the literature for the practicing clinician, with insights relevant to their practice of fracture care.
METHODS
The MEDLINE online database (Pubmed) was searched in September 2021 for relevant articles Results: The search provided 816 results, which were scanned by the first author by the title and abstract. With relevance to the research topic, 59 articles were chosen and read in detail. Another 70 articles were added by screening the references of relevant articles. A total of 129 articles were read and analysed Conclusions: Mechanical environment plays a crucial role in the fracture healing process. The definition of an optimal mechanical environment still evades us, due to the complexity of the problem. Computational models could replicate the complex mechanical environment of bone healing in humans but require detailed knowledge of mechano-transduction and material properties of healing tissues. The literature reminds us of the importance of adequate stiffness of constructs used under conditions of relative stability. Hopefully, further research in this field will result in not only empirical but more accurate and evidence-based assessments of osteosynthesis fixations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35604250
doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS3.12584
pmc: PMC9437681
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2021582Références
J Biomech. 2002 Apr;35(4):401-14
pubmed: 11934410
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Jun;80(6):868-78
pubmed: 9655105
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Jul;21(6):646-55
pubmed: 16513229
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Nov;84(8):1093-110
pubmed: 12463652
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2016 Mar;39(1):123-33
pubmed: 26634603
J Orthop Res. 2006 Aug;24(8):1679-86
pubmed: 16788988
J Orthop Res. 2004 Sep;22(5):1072-8
pubmed: 15304281
J Biomech. 1999 Mar;32(3):255-66
pubmed: 10093025
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Feb;443:307-14
pubmed: 16462456
J Biomech. 2000 Aug;33(8):961-8
pubmed: 10828326
J Orthop Res. 2003 Jul;21(4):662-9
pubmed: 12798066
Mech Dev. 1998 Feb;71(1-2):65-76
pubmed: 9507067
J Orthop Res. 2004 Sep;22(5):1079-85
pubmed: 15304282
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Oct;(355 Suppl):S41-55
pubmed: 9917625
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003 Oct;388(5):316-22
pubmed: 13680236
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Mar;(336):216-25
pubmed: 9060508
J Orthop Res. 2003 Nov;21(6):1011-7
pubmed: 14554213
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jan;(310):218-28
pubmed: 7641443
Bone. 2006 Jun;38(6):864-70
pubmed: 16359937
J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Nov-Dec;19(10 Suppl):S4-6
pubmed: 16479221
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2010 Dec;9(6):713-24
pubmed: 20333537
Unfallchirurg. 2017 Jan;120(1):23-31
pubmed: 27975121
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(4):253-60
pubmed: 26516728
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010 Dec;224(12):1543-53
pubmed: 21287837
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Oct;(355 Suppl):S179-90
pubmed: 9917638
J Biomech. 1993 Sep;26(9):1027-35
pubmed: 8408085
J Orthop Res. 2005 Sep;23(5):1022-8
pubmed: 15878254
Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2010 Mar;90(1):75-85
pubmed: 20301221
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012 Jan 31;8(3):133-43
pubmed: 22293759
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015 Jan;11(1):45-54
pubmed: 25266456
J Orthop Res. 2001 Jan;19(1):78-84
pubmed: 11332624
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Jul;(328):194-202
pubmed: 8653957
J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5(3):351-64
pubmed: 1941320
J Orthop Res. 2009 Jan;27(1):22-7
pubmed: 18634011
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jul;89(7):1575-85
pubmed: 17606797
Acta Orthop. 2017 Apr;88(2):217-222
pubmed: 27841708
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 Aug;67(4):650-5
pubmed: 4030869
J Biomech. 2000 Apr;33(4):415-25
pubmed: 10768390
J Biomech. 2002 Sep;35(9):1163-71
pubmed: 12163306
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955 Oct;37-A(5):1035-68
pubmed: 13263349
Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch. 1960;121:478-515
pubmed: 14431062
J Orthop Res. 2011 Mar;29(3):425-32
pubmed: 20882588
Unfallchirurg. 2017 Jan;120(1):14-22
pubmed: 27966008
Chirurg. 2000 Sep;71(9):989-94
pubmed: 11043114
J Biomech. 2006;39(8):1507-16
pubmed: 15972212
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2011;14(1):79-93
pubmed: 21086207