LFP Analysis of Brain Injured Anesthetized Animals Undergoing Closed-Loop Intracortical Stimulation.
Journal
IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
ISSN: 1558-0210
Titre abrégé: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101097023
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
pubmed:
24
5
2022
medline:
7
6
2022
entrez:
23
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Activity dependent stimulation (ADS) is a closed loop stimulation technique whose neurophysiological effects have not been deeply investigated. Here we explored how Local field Potentials (LFP) are impacted by a focal ischemic lesion and, subsequently, by ADS treatment. Intracortical microelectrode arrays were implanted in the rostral forelimb area (RFA) and in the primary somatosensory area (S1) of anaesthetized rats. An ischemic injury was induced in the caudal forelimb area through microinjections of Endothelin-1. The lesion induced an acute depressive trend in LFP power in RFA (evaluated in 6 bands of interest: Delta (1-4Hz), Theta (4-8Hz), Alpha (8-11Hz), Beta (11-30Hz), LowGamma (30-55Hz) and HighGamma (55-80)) followed by a noticeable significant rebound in both areas. Applying ADS induced an overall decrease of power. The lesion impacted the connectivity in a frequency specific manner, resulting in widespread increase in connectivity in Delta both between and within areas. Two hours after the lesion, without stimulation, correlated activity between areas increased in Beta and Gamma. After stimulation, inter-area connectivity increased in Delta, Theta and Alpha, while considerably dropping within RFA in highGamma. By computing phase-amplitude coupling, we found that the lesion produced an incremental increase in the coupling between (Theta) Alpha phase and (lowGamma) highGamma amplitude within RFA, while S1 had a more generalized increase. Likewise, coupling between Theta phase and lowGamma/highGamma amplitudes increased between areas after lesion. ADS induced a similar increase, but greater in magnitude both within and between RFA and S1. These results have important implications on the emerging field of closed-loop adaptive stimulation promoting ADS as an innovative tool for the treatment of neurological disorders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35604961
doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3177254
pmc: PMC9216176
mid: NIHMS1812767
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1441-1451Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS030853
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R03 HD094608
Pays : United States
Références
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Oct 1;31(11):5042-5055
pubmed: 34165137
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:879716
pubmed: 21584256
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Jul;28(1):221-37
pubmed: 18662344
Brain. 2005 Oct;128(Pt 10):2224-39
pubmed: 16141282
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 24;110(52):21177-82
pubmed: 24324155
Neuropharmacology. 2000 Mar 3;39(5):842-51
pubmed: 10699449
Brain. 2005 Mar;128(Pt 3):490-9
pubmed: 15634731
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2018 May 21;2:2398212818776475
pubmed: 32166141
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Apr;127(4):2010-9
pubmed: 26971483
Neurol Res. 2003 Dec;25(8):780-8
pubmed: 14669519
J Neurosci. 2014 Sep 17;34(38):12816-27
pubmed: 25232117
Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Jan;133:29-38
pubmed: 34794045
Neuron. 2013 Mar 20;77(6):1002-16
pubmed: 23522038
Cell Rep. 2019 Sep 3;28(10):2527-2540.e9
pubmed: 31484066
Lancet Neurol. 2006 Aug;5(8):708-12
pubmed: 16857577
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011 Mar;105(1-2):49-57
pubmed: 20869387
Nat Methods. 2014 Oct;11(10):977-8
pubmed: 25392877
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Dec 24;7:887
pubmed: 24399951
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Apr;17(4):491-6
pubmed: 24671065
Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 01;11(11):
pubmed: 34827452
J Neurosci. 2002 Jul 15;22(14):6062-70
pubmed: 12122067
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 16;107(7):3228-33
pubmed: 20133762
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012 Dec;14(4):345-67
pubmed: 23393413
Stroke. 2010 Mar;41(3):544-9
pubmed: 20075346
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Mar;10(3):186-98
pubmed: 19190637
Ann Neurol. 2019 Dec;86(6):853-865
pubmed: 31604371
Exp Neurol. 2011 Jun;229(2):324-31
pubmed: 21376039
Front Neurosci. 2016 Jul 07;10:315
pubmed: 27458335
Cell. 2021 Feb 18;184(4):912-930.e20
pubmed: 33571430
Nat Med. 2018 Aug;24(8):1257-1267
pubmed: 29915259
Cereb Cortex. 2020 May 14;30(5):2879-2896
pubmed: 31832642
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Jun;15(6):884-90
pubmed: 22561454
Neuron. 2022 Jan 5;110(1):21-35
pubmed: 34784504
Transl Stroke Res. 2016 Aug;7(4):331-42
pubmed: 27000881
Behav Brain Res. 2005 Nov 30;165(1):98-109
pubmed: 16105695
Science. 2006 Sep 15;313(5793):1626-8
pubmed: 16973878
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Nov;14(11):506-15
pubmed: 20932795
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 8;106(49):20942-7
pubmed: 19934062
Brain. 2003 Oct;126(Pt 10):2153-63
pubmed: 12937087
Neural Comput. 2016 May;28(5):882-913
pubmed: 26942748
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jul;11(7):267-9
pubmed: 17548233
J Neurosci. 2010 May 12;30(19):6667-77
pubmed: 20463229
Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603
pubmed: 28122885
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 15;210:116589
pubmed: 32007498
Stroke. 2000 Mar;31(3):656-61
pubmed: 10700500