Prognostic value of lesion dissemination in doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine-treated, interimPET-negative classical Hodgkin Lymphoma patients: A radio-genomic study.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Bleomycin
/ therapeutic use
Dacarbazine
/ therapeutic use
Doxorubicin
/ therapeutic use
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
/ therapeutic use
Genomics
Hodgkin Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Positron-Emission Tomography
/ methods
Prognosis
RNA
/ therapeutic use
Retrospective Studies
Vinblastine
/ therapeutic use
Dmax
Hodgkin's lymphoma
PET
gene expression profiling
tumor dissemination
tumor microenvironment
Journal
Hematological oncology
ISSN: 1099-1069
Titre abrégé: Hematol Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8307268
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
12
04
2022
accepted:
16
05
2022
pubmed:
24
5
2022
medline:
12
10
2022
entrez:
23
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We evaluated the prognostic role of the largest distance between two lesions (Dmax), defined by positron emission tomography (PET) in a retrospective cohort of newly diagnosed classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) patients. We also explored the molecular bases underlying Dmax through a gene expression analysis of diagnostic biopsies. We included patients diagnosed with cHL from 2007 to 2020, initially treated with ABVD, with available baseline PET for review, and with at least two FDG avid lesions. Patients with available RNA from diagnostic biopsy were eligible for gene expression analysis. Dmax was deduced from the three-dimensional coordinates of the baseline metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and its effect on progression free survival (PFS) was evaluated. Gene expression profiles were correlated with Dmax and analyzed using CIBERSORTx algorithm to perform deconvolution. The study was conducted on 155 eligible cHL patients. Using its median value of 20 cm, Dmax was the only variable independently associated with PFS (HR = 2.70, 95% CI 1.1-6.63, pValue = 0.03) in multivariate analysis of PFS for all patients and for those with early complete metabolic response (iPET-). Among patients with iPET-low Dmax was associated with a 4-year PFS of 90% (95% CI 82.0-98.9) significantly better compared to high Dmax (4-year PFS 72.4%, 95% CI 61.9-84.6). From the analysis of gene expression profiles differences in Dmax were mostly associated with variations in the expression of microenvironmental components. In conclusion our results support tumor dissemination measured through Dmax as novel prognostic factor for cHL patients treated with ABVD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35606338
doi: 10.1002/hon.3025
pmc: PMC9796042
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
0Z5B2CJX4D
Bleomycin
11056-06-7
Vinblastine
5V9KLZ54CY
RNA
63231-63-0
Dacarbazine
7GR28W0FJI
Doxorubicin
80168379AG
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
645-657Subventions
Organisme : GRADE Onlus
Organisme : Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
Organisme : Italian Ministry of Health - Ricerca Corrente Annual Program 2023
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. -.
Références
Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30:531-64
pubmed: 22224781
Blood. 2018 Sep 6;132(10):1013-1021
pubmed: 30049811
Leuk Lymphoma. 2009 Aug;50(8):1257-60
pubmed: 19544140
Lancet Haematol. 2016 Oct;3(10):e467-e479
pubmed: 27692305
Ann Oncol. 2021 Mar;32(3):404-411
pubmed: 33278600
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0210224
pubmed: 30625203
Nature. 2007 Feb 22;445(7130):931-5
pubmed: 17237765
J Nucl Med. 2018 Jun 7;:
pubmed: 29880508
Cancer Res. 2018 Aug 15;78(16):4786-4789
pubmed: 29959149
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Apr;18(4):454-463
pubmed: 28236583
Hematol Oncol. 2021 Apr;39(2):205-214
pubmed: 33215701
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jan 15;26(2):373-383
pubmed: 31645353
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):337-44
pubmed: 10877287
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 10;31(2):256-62
pubmed: 23045593
Blood. 2018 Nov 22;132(21):2273-2279
pubmed: 30166329
J Nucl Med. 2020 Jan;61(1):40-45
pubmed: 31201248
Nat Methods. 2015 May;12(5):453-7
pubmed: 25822800
Hematol Oncol. 2022 Oct;40(4):645-657
pubmed: 35606338
EMBO J. 2012 Jun 05;31(14):3130-46
pubmed: 22669466
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3059-68
pubmed: 25113753
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 20;34(30):3591-3594
pubmed: 27601547
Ann Oncol. 2014 May;25(5):921-7
pubmed: 24351400
Cell. 2006 Jan 27;124(2):263-6
pubmed: 16439202
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 21;365(3):203-12
pubmed: 21774708
Blood. 2019 Oct 10;134(15):1238-1246
pubmed: 31331918
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000 Jun;82(3):250-4
pubmed: 10929220
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 23;372(17):1598-607
pubmed: 25901426
Nat Rev Cancer. 2021 Jun;21(6):345-359
pubmed: 33837297
Nat Immunol. 2020 Apr;21(4):442-454
pubmed: 32152508
Haematologica. 2018 Aug;103(8):1256-1268
pubmed: 30006449
Ann Oncol. 2002;13 Suppl 4:147-52
pubmed: 12401681
J Nucl Med. 2006 May;47(5):885-95
pubmed: 16644760
Semin Cancer Biol. 2014 Feb;24:15-22
pubmed: 23867303
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 10;34(11):1175-81
pubmed: 26712220
Ann Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;29(12):2363-2370
pubmed: 30307529
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Feb;42(2):328-54
pubmed: 25452219
Blood. 2018 Mar 29;131(13):1456-1463
pubmed: 29437590