Diversity-sensitive measures in German hospitals - attitudes, implementation, and barriers according to administration managers.
Culturally sensitive
Diversity
Germany
Hospital care
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 May 2022
23 May 2022
Historique:
received:
22
09
2021
accepted:
09
05
2022
entrez:
23
5
2022
pubmed:
24
5
2022
medline:
26
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Populations have varying needs and expectations concerning health care that result from diversity characteristics such as a migrant background, gender identity, disability, and age. These needs and expectations must be considered to ensure adequate utilization and quality of health services. Approaches to address diversity do exist, however, little is known about the extent to which they are implemented by health care facilities. The present study aims to examine, which measures and structures hospitals in Germany employ to address diversity, as well as which barriers they encounter in doing so. A mixed-mode survey among administration managers of all registered German hospitals (excluding rehabilitation hospitals; n = 1125) was conducted between May and October 2019 using pen-and-paper and online questionnaires. Results were analyzed descriptively. Data from n = 112 hospitals were available. While 57.1% of hospitals addressed diversity in their mission statement and 59.9% included diversity considerations in quality management, dedicated working groups and diversity commissioners were less prevalent (15.2% each). The majority of hospitals offered multi-lingual admission and exit interviews (59.8%), treatments or therapies (57.1%), but only few had multi-lingual meal plans (12.5%) and seminars or presentations (11.6%). While 41.1% of the hospitals offered treatment and/or nursing exclusively by staff of the same sex, only 17.0% offered group therapies for both sexes separately. According to the managers, the main barriers were a lack of financial resources (54.5%), a lack of incentives from the funding providers (49.1%), and organizational difficulties (45.5%). Other reported barriers were a lack of conviction of the necessity among decision makers (28.6%) and a lack of motivation among staff members (19.6%). Administration managers from only a small proportion of hospitals participated in our survey on diversity sensitivity. Even hospitals of those who did are currently not adequately addressing the diversity of staff members and patients. Most hospitals address diversity on an ideational level, practical measures are not widely implemented. Existing measures suggest that most hospitals have no overarching concept to address diversity in a broader sense. The main reported barriers relate to economic aspects, a lack of support in organizing and implementing corresponding measures and a lack of awareness or motivation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Populations have varying needs and expectations concerning health care that result from diversity characteristics such as a migrant background, gender identity, disability, and age. These needs and expectations must be considered to ensure adequate utilization and quality of health services. Approaches to address diversity do exist, however, little is known about the extent to which they are implemented by health care facilities. The present study aims to examine, which measures and structures hospitals in Germany employ to address diversity, as well as which barriers they encounter in doing so.
METHODS
METHODS
A mixed-mode survey among administration managers of all registered German hospitals (excluding rehabilitation hospitals; n = 1125) was conducted between May and October 2019 using pen-and-paper and online questionnaires. Results were analyzed descriptively.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Data from n = 112 hospitals were available. While 57.1% of hospitals addressed diversity in their mission statement and 59.9% included diversity considerations in quality management, dedicated working groups and diversity commissioners were less prevalent (15.2% each). The majority of hospitals offered multi-lingual admission and exit interviews (59.8%), treatments or therapies (57.1%), but only few had multi-lingual meal plans (12.5%) and seminars or presentations (11.6%). While 41.1% of the hospitals offered treatment and/or nursing exclusively by staff of the same sex, only 17.0% offered group therapies for both sexes separately. According to the managers, the main barriers were a lack of financial resources (54.5%), a lack of incentives from the funding providers (49.1%), and organizational difficulties (45.5%). Other reported barriers were a lack of conviction of the necessity among decision makers (28.6%) and a lack of motivation among staff members (19.6%).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Administration managers from only a small proportion of hospitals participated in our survey on diversity sensitivity. Even hospitals of those who did are currently not adequately addressing the diversity of staff members and patients. Most hospitals address diversity on an ideational level, practical measures are not widely implemented. Existing measures suggest that most hospitals have no overarching concept to address diversity in a broader sense. The main reported barriers relate to economic aspects, a lack of support in organizing and implementing corresponding measures and a lack of awareness or motivation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35606740
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08058-3
pii: 10.1186/s12913-022-08058-3
pmc: PMC9128136
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
689Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2017 Oct;56(5):299-304
pubmed: 28437817
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Oct 6;114(40):673-679
pubmed: 29070427
Online J Issues Nurs. 2003;8(1):3
pubmed: 12729453
J Emerg Nurs. 2018 Nov;44(6):632-639
pubmed: 29704979
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 22;16(19):
pubmed: 31546719
Br Med Bull. 2017 Jan 1;121(1):5-18
pubmed: 28108435
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Sep;29(5):1222-1232
pubmed: 33316110
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Sep;75(5):815-22
pubmed: 22647564
Am J Med. 2020 Apr;133(4):424-428.e2
pubmed: 31935351
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Aug;60(8):841-848
pubmed: 28664273
Soc Work Health Care. 2019 Feb;58(2):201-219
pubmed: 30321122
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Jun;53:67-77
pubmed: 28448883
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 30;14(7):e0219971
pubmed: 31361783
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):30
pubmed: 29347933
Gerontologist. 2022 Mar 28;62(3):e162-e177
pubmed: 32941597
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 11;19(1):159
pubmed: 32917207
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2013 Jun;46(4):346-52
pubmed: 23242335
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Nov 19;7(1):61
pubmed: 30449283
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Feb 10;20(1):58
pubmed: 33568126
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Nov 1;17(1):160
pubmed: 30382861
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jul;102(7):1267-73
pubmed: 22594719
Palliat Med. 2020 Sep;34(8):1006-1018
pubmed: 32552409
Soc Work Health Care. 2019 Jul;58(6):547-556
pubmed: 30908176
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):1039
pubmed: 32605605