Type 2 diabetes mellitus accelerates brain aging and cognitive decline: Complementary findings from UK Biobank and meta-analyses.
MRI
aging
brain
diabetes
epidemiology
functional MRI
global health
human
medicine
neuroimaging
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 05 2022
24 05 2022
Historique:
received:
17
08
2021
accepted:
26
04
2022
pubmed:
25
5
2022
medline:
27
5
2022
entrez:
24
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is known to be associated with neurobiological and cognitive deficits; however, their extent, overlap with aging effects, and the effectiveness of existing treatments in the context of the brain are currently unknown. We characterized neurocognitive effects independently associated with T2DM and age in a large cohort of human subjects from the UK Biobank with cross-sectional neuroimaging and cognitive data. We then proceeded to evaluate the extent of overlap between the effects related to T2DM and age by applying correlation measures to the separately characterized neurocognitive changes. Our findings were complemented by meta-analyses of published reports with cognitive or neuroimaging measures for T2DM and healthy controls (HCs). We also evaluated in a cohort of T2DM-diagnosed individuals using UK Biobank how disease chronicity and metformin treatment interact with the identified neurocognitive effects. The UK Biobank dataset included cognitive and neuroimaging data (N = 20,314), including 1012 T2DM and 19,302 HCs, aged between 50 and 80 years. Duration of T2DM ranged from 0 to 31 years (mean 8.5 ± 6.1 years); 498 were treated with metformin alone, while 352 were unmedicated. Our meta-analysis evaluated 34 cognitive studies (N = 22,231) and 60 neuroimaging studies: 30 of T2DM (N = 866) and 30 of aging (N = 1088). Compared to age, sex, education, and hypertension-matched HC, T2DM was associated with marked cognitive deficits, particularly in The neurocognitive impact of T2DM suggests marked acceleration of normal brain aging. T2DM gray matter atrophy occurred approximately 26% ± 14% faster than seen with normal aging; disease duration was associated with increased neurodegeneration. Mechanistically, our results suggest a neurometabolic component to brain aging. Clinically, neuroimaging-based biomarkers may provide a valuable adjunctive measure of T2DM progression and treatment efficacy based on neurological effects. The research described in this article was funded by the W. M. Keck Foundation (to LRMP), the White House Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Technologies (BRAIN) Initiative (NSFNCS-FR 1926781 to LRMP), and the Baszucki Brain Research Fund (to LRMP). None of the funding sources played any role in the design of the experiments, data collection, analysis, interpretation of the results, the decision to publish, or any aspect relevant to the study. DJW reports serving on data monitoring committees for Novo Nordisk. None of the authors received funding or in-kind support from pharmaceutical and/or other companies to write this article.
Sections du résumé
Background
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is known to be associated with neurobiological and cognitive deficits; however, their extent, overlap with aging effects, and the effectiveness of existing treatments in the context of the brain are currently unknown.
Methods
We characterized neurocognitive effects independently associated with T2DM and age in a large cohort of human subjects from the UK Biobank with cross-sectional neuroimaging and cognitive data. We then proceeded to evaluate the extent of overlap between the effects related to T2DM and age by applying correlation measures to the separately characterized neurocognitive changes. Our findings were complemented by meta-analyses of published reports with cognitive or neuroimaging measures for T2DM and healthy controls (HCs). We also evaluated in a cohort of T2DM-diagnosed individuals using UK Biobank how disease chronicity and metformin treatment interact with the identified neurocognitive effects.
Results
The UK Biobank dataset included cognitive and neuroimaging data (N = 20,314), including 1012 T2DM and 19,302 HCs, aged between 50 and 80 years. Duration of T2DM ranged from 0 to 31 years (mean 8.5 ± 6.1 years); 498 were treated with metformin alone, while 352 were unmedicated. Our meta-analysis evaluated 34 cognitive studies (N = 22,231) and 60 neuroimaging studies: 30 of T2DM (N = 866) and 30 of aging (N = 1088). Compared to age, sex, education, and hypertension-matched HC, T2DM was associated with marked cognitive deficits, particularly in
Conclusions
The neurocognitive impact of T2DM suggests marked acceleration of normal brain aging. T2DM gray matter atrophy occurred approximately 26% ± 14% faster than seen with normal aging; disease duration was associated with increased neurodegeneration. Mechanistically, our results suggest a neurometabolic component to brain aging. Clinically, neuroimaging-based biomarkers may provide a valuable adjunctive measure of T2DM progression and treatment efficacy based on neurological effects.
Funding
The research described in this article was funded by the W. M. Keck Foundation (to LRMP), the White House Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Technologies (BRAIN) Initiative (NSFNCS-FR 1926781 to LRMP), and the Baszucki Brain Research Fund (to LRMP). None of the funding sources played any role in the design of the experiments, data collection, analysis, interpretation of the results, the decision to publish, or any aspect relevant to the study. DJW reports serving on data monitoring committees for Novo Nordisk. None of the authors received funding or in-kind support from pharmaceutical and/or other companies to write this article.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35608247
doi: 10.7554/eLife.73138
pii: 73138
pmc: PMC9132576
doi:
pii:
Substances chimiques
Metformin
9100L32L2N
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_17228
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_QA137853
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022, Antal et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
BA, LM, SS, AL, LM No competing interests declared, DW is part of a Novo Nordisk data monitoring committee service for semaglutide in SOUL and FLOW trials. The author has no other competing interests to declare, BD received royalties from Cambridge University Press and Oxford University Press, and consulting fees from Acadia, Alector, Arkuda, Biogen, Denali, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Takeda, Wave LifeSciences (unrelated to the present work). Also participates in a Lilly Data Safety Monitoring Board (unrelated to the present work) and participates in leadership roles in Alzheimer's Association and Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration. The author has no other competing interests to declare, ER received honoraria from Harvard Catalyst. The author has no other competing interests to declare
Références
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Nov;14(11):489-96
pubmed: 20884276
J Clin Invest. 1955 Jul;34(7, Part 1):1101-8
pubmed: 14392225
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Feb;6(2):122-129
pubmed: 29199115
J Diabetes Complications. 2016 Mar;30(2):212-20
pubmed: 26689451
Nat Neurosci. 2004 May;7(5):473-81
pubmed: 15114361
J Endocr Soc. 2017 Apr 18;1(6):600-608
pubmed: 29264513
Lancet Neurol. 2006 Jan;5(1):64-74
pubmed: 16361024
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1995 Jul;352(1):67-73
pubmed: 7477427
Exp Gerontol. 2003 Sep;38(9):1009-13
pubmed: 12954488
Brain Dev. 2007 Mar;29(2):83-91
pubmed: 16919409
Brain Res. 1998 Jun 22;797(1):1-11
pubmed: 9630471
NMR Biomed. 1997 Jun-Aug;10(4-5):171-8
pubmed: 9430344
Menopause. 2016 Jul;23(7):803-5
pubmed: 27272226
J Neurochem. 2019 Jun;149(5):605-623
pubmed: 30968952
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Dec 2;161(11):785-93
pubmed: 25437406
Biol Sex Differ. 2019 Jul 1;10(1):32
pubmed: 31262342
Endocr Connect. 2015 Jun;4(2):R16-24
pubmed: 25712899
Diabetologia. 2007 Apr;50(4):711-9
pubmed: 17334649
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 1;166:400-424
pubmed: 29079522
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998 Apr;8(2):178-87
pubmed: 9635200
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 17;117(11):6170-6177
pubmed: 32127481
Neurosci Lett. 1996 Aug 2;213(2):103-6
pubmed: 8858619
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Sep;1353:60-71
pubmed: 26132277
J Chem Neuroanat. 2002 Nov;24(4):225-42
pubmed: 12406499
Diabetes. 2010 Sep;59(9):2152-9
pubmed: 20484137
Hypertension. 2003 Dec;42(6):1206-52
pubmed: 14656957
Diabetologia. 2019 Mar;62(3):448-458
pubmed: 30547230
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Jun;3(6):433-42
pubmed: 12042878
Comput Biomed Res. 1996 Jun;29(3):162-73
pubmed: 8812068
Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14(5):487
pubmed: 24623199
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2015 May-Aug;5(2):124-7
pubmed: 26097821
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2016;14(1):101-15
pubmed: 26813123
Diabetes. 2006 Apr;55(4):1106-13
pubmed: 16567535
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 13;110(33):13642-7
pubmed: 23898179
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Feb;25(2):215-229
pubmed: 30575498
Curr Diab Rep. 2016 Sep;16(9):87
pubmed: 27491830
Elife. 2020 Mar 04;9:
pubmed: 32129761
J Comp Neurol. 1998 Oct 5;399(4):492-512
pubmed: 9741479
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160
pubmed: 33781993
PLoS Med. 2015 Mar 31;12(3):e1001779
pubmed: 25826379
Mol Psychiatry. 2012 May;17(5):471, 549-58
pubmed: 21727896
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 5;118(40):
pubmed: 34588302
Diabet Med. 2018 Dec;35(12):1663-1670
pubmed: 30230019
Nat Methods. 2011 Jun 26;8(8):665-70
pubmed: 21706013
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120