Neuropathologic Features of Antemortem Atrophy-Based Subtypes of Alzheimer Disease.

Alpha-synuclein Alzheimer’s disease Amyloid Heterogeneity Lewy bodies MRI TDP-43 Tau antemortem biological subtypes neuropathology postmortem

Journal

Neurology
ISSN: 1526-632X
Titre abrégé: Neurology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401060

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 May 2022
Historique:
received: 22 10 2021
accepted: 04 03 2022
entrez: 24 5 2022
pubmed: 25 5 2022
medline: 25 5 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To investigate whether antemortem MRI-based atrophy subtypes of Alzheimer's disease (AD) differ in neuropathological features and comorbid non-AD pathologies at postmortem. From the ADNI cohort, we included individuals with: antemortem MRI evaluating brain atrophy within 2y before death; antemortem diagnosis of AD dementia/mild cognitive impairment; postmortem-confirmed AD neuropathologic change. Antemortem atrophy subtypes were modeled as continuous phenomena based on a recent conceptual framework: In 31 individuals (26 AD dementia/5 mild cognitive impaired, mean age=80y, 26% females), antemortem typicality was significantly negatively associated with neuropathological features, including amyloid-beta (rho=-0.39 overall), tau (rho=-0.38 regionally), alpha-synuclein (rho=-0.39 regionally), TDP-43 (rho=-0.49 overall), and concomitance of pathologies (rho=-0.59 regionally). Limbic-predominant AD was associated with higher Thal phase, neuritic plaque density, and presence of TDP-43 compared to hippocampal-sparing AD. Regionally, limbic-predominant AD showed higher presence of tau and alpha-synuclein pathologies in medial temporal structures, higher presence of TDP-43 and concomitance of pathologies subcortically/cortically compared to hippocampal-sparing AD. Antemortem severity was significantly negatively associated with concomitance of pathologies (rho=-0.43 regionally), such that typical AD showed higher concomitance of pathologies than minimal atrophy AD. We provide a direct antemortem-to-postmortem validation, highlighting the importance of understanding atrophy-based heterogeneity in AD relative to AD and non-AD pathologies. We suggest that: (a) typicality and severity in atrophy reflect differential aspects of susceptibility of the brain to AD and non-AD pathologies; (b) limbic-predominant AD and typical AD subtypes share similar biological pathways, making them more vulnerable to AD and non-AD pathologies compared to hippocampal-sparing AD, which may follow a different biological pathway. Our findings provide a deeper understanding of associations of atrophy subtypes in AD with different pathologies, enhancing prevailing knowledge of biological heterogeneity in AD and could contribute towards tracking disease progression and designing clinical trials in the future.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35609990
pii: WNL.0000000000200573
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200573
pmc: PMC9421777
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

Références

Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Mar;15(3):400-409
pubmed: 30439333
Acta Neuropathol. 2017 Aug;134(2):187-205
pubmed: 28401333
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Sep 25;17:452-464
pubmed: 29159058
Brain. 2019 Jun 1;142(6):1503-1527
pubmed: 31039256
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021 May 14;13(1):100
pubmed: 33990226
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
pubmed: 3806354
Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Jan;123(1):153-4
pubmed: 22009303
Front Neuroinform. 2014 Jan 06;7:49
pubmed: 24432000
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018 Mar 06;10:245-252
pubmed: 29780869
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Oct;11(10):868-77
pubmed: 22951070
Acta Neuropathol. 2008 Aug;116(2):215-20
pubmed: 18592255
Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Jul;11(7):815-22
pubmed: 26194314
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Alzheimers Dement. 2020 Jun;16(6):843-852
pubmed: 32323446
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2012 May;71(5):362-81
pubmed: 22487856
Neurology. 2020 Jul 14;95(2):e155-e165
pubmed: 32561678
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Apr;131(4):571-85
pubmed: 26810071
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Sep;10(9):785-96
pubmed: 21802369
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 18;7:46263
pubmed: 28417965
Brain Imaging Behav. 2012 Dec;6(4):502-16
pubmed: 22782295
Brain. 2021 Aug 17;144(7):2186-2198
pubmed: 33693619
Ann Neurol. 2015 Nov;78(5):697-709
pubmed: 26224156
Neurology. 2020 Mar 10;94(10):436-448
pubmed: 32047067
Neurobiol Aging. 2018 May;65:98-108
pubmed: 29455029
Neurology. 2017 Nov 21;89(21):2176-2186
pubmed: 29070667
Neurology. 2020 Sep 8;95(10):e1301-e1311
pubmed: 32631924
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 5;13(1):4566
pubmed: 35931678
Brain Imaging Behav. 2012 Dec;6(4):517-27
pubmed: 22644789
Neurobiol Aging. 2018 Oct;70:18-29
pubmed: 29935417
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):968-80
pubmed: 16530430
Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Nov;124(5):681-92
pubmed: 22968369
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2018 Dec 19;6(1):142
pubmed: 30567576
Neurology. 2021 Jul 15;:
pubmed: 34266917
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2002 Oct-Dec;16(4):203-12
pubmed: 12468894
Neurology. 2005 Dec 27;65(12):1863-72
pubmed: 16237129
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Nov;16(11):917-924
pubmed: 28919059
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 30;10(11):e0142756
pubmed: 26618360
Brain Commun. 2020 Nov 09;2(2):fcaa192
pubmed: 33305264
Neurodegener Dis. 2016;16(1-2):77-86
pubmed: 26726737
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Aug 1;78(8):961-971
pubmed: 34180956
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014 Nov 21;6(9):82
pubmed: 25419243
Acta Neuropathol. 2014 Sep;128(3):411-21
pubmed: 24899141
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006 Jul;65(7):685-97
pubmed: 16825955
Brain. 2009 May;132(Pt 5):1324-34
pubmed: 19321462
Aging (Albany NY). 2018 Nov 14;10(11):3058-3060
pubmed: 30428453
Neuron. 2002 Jan 31;33(3):341-55
pubmed: 11832223
Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Jan;123(1):1-11
pubmed: 22101365

Auteurs

Rosaleena Mohanty (R)

Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden rosaleena.mohanty@ki.se.

Daniel Ferreira (D)

Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

Simon Frerich (S)

Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.

J-Sebastian Muehlboeck (JS)

Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Michel J Grothe (MJ)

Unidad de Trastornos del Movimiento, Servicio de Neurología y Neurofisiología Clínica, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Clinical Dementia Research Section, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany.

Eric Westman (E)

Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Neuroimaging, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH