Trends in burnout and psychological distress in hospital staff over 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective longitudinal survey.
Burnout
COVID-19
Healthcare workers
Nurses
Pandemic
Psychological distress
Resilience
Journal
Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)
ISSN: 1745-6673
Titre abrégé: J Occup Med Toxicol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245790
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 May 2022
25 May 2022
Historique:
received:
09
11
2021
accepted:
18
05
2022
entrez:
25
5
2022
pubmed:
26
5
2022
medline:
26
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The mental health effects of healthcare work during the COVID-19 pandemic have been substantial, but it is not known how long they will persist. This study aimed to determine if hospital workers' burnout and psychological distress increased monotonically over 1 year, during which waves of case numbers and hospitalizations waxed and waned, or followed some other pattern. A prospective longitudinal survey was conducted at four time-points over 1 year in a cohort of 538 hospital workers and learners, which included validated measures of burnout (emotional exhaustion scale of Maslach Burnout Inventory) and psychological distress (K6). Repeated measures ANOVA tested changes over time and differences between subjects by occupational role, age and ethnic group. The direction and magnitude of changes over time were investigated by plotting rates of high scores (using cut-offs) at each time-point compared to case rates of COVID-19 in the city in which the study took place. There were significant effects of occupational role (F = 11.2, p < .001) and age (F = 12.8, p < .001) on emotional exhaustion. The rate of high burnout was highest in nurses, followed by other healthcare professionals, other clinical staff, and lowest in non-clinical staff. Peak rates of high burnout occurred at the second or third measurement point for each occupational group, with lower rates at the fourth measurement point. Similarly to the results for emotional exhaustion, rates of high psychological distress peaked at the spring 2021 measurement point for most occupational groups and were higher in nurses than in other healthcare professionals. Neither emotional exhaustion nor psychological distress was rising monotonically. Burnout and psychological distress were consistently related to occupational role and were highest in nurses. Although emotional exhaustion improved as the case rate of COVID-19 decreased, rates of high emotional exhaustion in nurses and other healthcare professionals remained higher than was typically measured in hospital-based healthcare workers prior to the pandemic. Ongoing monitoring of healthcare workers' mental health is warranted. Organizational and individual interventions to support healthcare workers continue to be important.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The mental health effects of healthcare work during the COVID-19 pandemic have been substantial, but it is not known how long they will persist. This study aimed to determine if hospital workers' burnout and psychological distress increased monotonically over 1 year, during which waves of case numbers and hospitalizations waxed and waned, or followed some other pattern.
METHODS
METHODS
A prospective longitudinal survey was conducted at four time-points over 1 year in a cohort of 538 hospital workers and learners, which included validated measures of burnout (emotional exhaustion scale of Maslach Burnout Inventory) and psychological distress (K6). Repeated measures ANOVA tested changes over time and differences between subjects by occupational role, age and ethnic group. The direction and magnitude of changes over time were investigated by plotting rates of high scores (using cut-offs) at each time-point compared to case rates of COVID-19 in the city in which the study took place.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There were significant effects of occupational role (F = 11.2, p < .001) and age (F = 12.8, p < .001) on emotional exhaustion. The rate of high burnout was highest in nurses, followed by other healthcare professionals, other clinical staff, and lowest in non-clinical staff. Peak rates of high burnout occurred at the second or third measurement point for each occupational group, with lower rates at the fourth measurement point. Similarly to the results for emotional exhaustion, rates of high psychological distress peaked at the spring 2021 measurement point for most occupational groups and were higher in nurses than in other healthcare professionals.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Neither emotional exhaustion nor psychological distress was rising monotonically. Burnout and psychological distress were consistently related to occupational role and were highest in nurses. Although emotional exhaustion improved as the case rate of COVID-19 decreased, rates of high emotional exhaustion in nurses and other healthcare professionals remained higher than was typically measured in hospital-based healthcare workers prior to the pandemic. Ongoing monitoring of healthcare workers' mental health is warranted. Organizational and individual interventions to support healthcare workers continue to be important.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35614505
doi: 10.1186/s12995-022-00352-4
pii: 10.1186/s12995-022-00352-4
pmc: PMC9132565
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
11Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 9;8(6):e019525
pubmed: 29886440
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 03;8:590190
pubmed: 33344401
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;60(2):184-9
pubmed: 12578436
Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;49(3):419-427
pubmed: 33555778
Crit Care Nurse. 2017 Oct;37(5):e1-e9
pubmed: 28966203
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0246454
pubmed: 33690641
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jul 28;14:325
pubmed: 25066375
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Mar;45(3):418-27
pubmed: 17109862
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 23;5(9):e008331
pubmed: 26359284
Int J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 20;13(1):40
pubmed: 32689925
Nurs Adm Q. 2022 Jan-Mar 01;46(1):5-18
pubmed: 34551423
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422
pubmed: 11148311
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 30;11(9):e054284
pubmed: 34593507
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 05;17(23):
pubmed: 33291511
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Aug;88:901-907
pubmed: 32437915
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021 Jul-Aug;71:88-94
pubmed: 33971518
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14755
pubmed: 34449957
ESMO Open. 2021 Aug;6(4):100199
pubmed: 34217129
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Mar;91:47-59
pubmed: 30669077
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019 Jan 04;8(1):2
pubmed: 30609943
JAMA Surg. 2016 Oct 1;151(10):970-978
pubmed: 27410167
Psychooncology. 2018 May;27(5):1426-1433
pubmed: 29314432
Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2272-2281
pubmed: 27692469
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 3;15(9):e0238217
pubmed: 32881887
JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1131-1150
pubmed: 30326495
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Dec;12(12):1924-32
pubmed: 17326946
Gen Psychiatr. 2021 Sep 06;34(5):e100577
pubmed: 34514332
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 08;11(7):e0159015
pubmed: 27391946
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Mar 24;21(1):36
pubmed: 33761876
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2022 Jan 1;42(1):e44-e52
pubmed: 33973927
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2021 Mar;34(1):7-19
pubmed: 33837685
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jul;119:103933
pubmed: 33901940
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103666
pubmed: 32592889
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Mar;95(3):476-487
pubmed: 31735343
BMJ Open. 2021 May 10;11(5):e050380
pubmed: 33972345
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Aug;77(8):3286-3302
pubmed: 33764561
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2019 Jan - Feb;56:13-18
pubmed: 30508772
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Aug;12(S1):S51-S54
pubmed: 32538658
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2020 Jun;18(2):265-273
pubmed: 32141948
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021 Aug;94(6):1345-1352
pubmed: 33864490
Global Health. 2020 Sep 29;16(1):92
pubmed: 32993696
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017 Aug;27(8):495-501
pubmed: 28903843
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 17;11(1):e045127
pubmed: 33455940
Int J Nurs Pract. 2016 Dec;22(6):596-604
pubmed: 27581098