Land use/land cover changes in the central part of the Chitwan Annapurna Landscape, Nepal.
Accuracy assessment
Habitat change detection
Image classification
Landsat image
Remote sensing
Journal
PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
20
12
2021
accepted:
22
04
2022
entrez:
26
5
2022
pubmed:
27
5
2022
medline:
27
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Land use/land cover assessment and monitoring of the land cover dynamics are essential to know the ecological, physical and anthropogenic processes in the landscape. Previous studies have indicated changes in the landscape of mid-hills of Nepal in the past few decades. But there is a lack of study in the Chitwan Annapurna Landscape; hence, this study was carried out to fill in study gap that existed in the area. This study evaluates land use/land cover dynamics between 2000 to 2020 in the central part of the Chitwan Annapurna Landscape, Nepal by using Landsat images. The Landsat images were classified into eight different classes using remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS). The accuracy assessment of classified images was evaluated by calculating actual accuracy, producer's accuracy, user's accuracy and kappa coefficient based on the ground-truthing points for 2020 and Google Earth and topographic maps for images of 2010 and 2000. The results of land use/land cover analysis of Landsat image 2020 showed that the study area was composed of grassland (1.73%), barren area (1.76%), riverine forest (1.93%), water body (1.97%), developed area (4.13%), Sal dominated forest (15.4%), cropland (28.13%) and mixed forest (44.95%). The results of land cover change between 2000 to 2020 indicated an overall increase in Sal dominated forest (7.6%), developed area (31.34%), mixed forest (37.46%) and decrease in riverine forest (11.29%), barren area (20.03%), croplands (29.87%) and grasslands (49.71%). The classification of the images of 2000, 2010 and 2020 had 81%, 81.6% and 84.77% overall accuracy, respectively. This finding can be used as a baseline information for the development of a proper management plan to protect wildlife habitats and forecasting possible future changes, if needed.
Sections du résumé
Background
Land use/land cover assessment and monitoring of the land cover dynamics are essential to know the ecological, physical and anthropogenic processes in the landscape. Previous studies have indicated changes in the landscape of mid-hills of Nepal in the past few decades. But there is a lack of study in the Chitwan Annapurna Landscape; hence, this study was carried out to fill in study gap that existed in the area.
Methods
This study evaluates land use/land cover dynamics between 2000 to 2020 in the central part of the Chitwan Annapurna Landscape, Nepal by using Landsat images. The Landsat images were classified into eight different classes using remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS). The accuracy assessment of classified images was evaluated by calculating actual accuracy, producer's accuracy, user's accuracy and kappa coefficient based on the ground-truthing points for 2020 and Google Earth and topographic maps for images of 2010 and 2000.
Results
The results of land use/land cover analysis of Landsat image 2020 showed that the study area was composed of grassland (1.73%), barren area (1.76%), riverine forest (1.93%), water body (1.97%), developed area (4.13%), Sal dominated forest (15.4%), cropland (28.13%) and mixed forest (44.95%). The results of land cover change between 2000 to 2020 indicated an overall increase in Sal dominated forest (7.6%), developed area (31.34%), mixed forest (37.46%) and decrease in riverine forest (11.29%), barren area (20.03%), croplands (29.87%) and grasslands (49.71%). The classification of the images of 2000, 2010 and 2020 had 81%, 81.6% and 84.77% overall accuracy, respectively. This finding can be used as a baseline information for the development of a proper management plan to protect wildlife habitats and forecasting possible future changes, if needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35615290
doi: 10.7717/peerj.13435
pii: 13435
pmc: PMC9126145
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e13435Informations de copyright
© 2022 Adhikari et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Remote Sens Environ. 2016 Apr 28;Volume 185(Iss 2):46-56
pubmed: 32020955
J Environ Manage. 2015 Jan 15;148:82-90
pubmed: 25181944
Environ Manage. 2021 May;67(5):963-973
pubmed: 33512574
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7720):639-643
pubmed: 30089903
Bioscience. 2017 Jun 1;67(6):534-545
pubmed: 28608869
Sensors (Basel). 2008 Oct 01;8(10):6188-6202
pubmed: 27873865
PeerJ. 2020 May 11;8:e9115
pubmed: 32435539
ScientificWorldJournal. 2022 Feb 21;2022:5129423
pubmed: 35237114
Springerplus. 2016 Jun 21;5(1):812
pubmed: 27390652
Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Sep 15;193(10):651
pubmed: 34523026
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Jun 6;191(7):415
pubmed: 31172363
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 10;10(1):11473
pubmed: 32651414