Precarious work and workplace dignity during COVID-19: A longitudinal study.
Decent work
Need satisfaction
Psychology of working
Underemployment
Journal
Journal of vocational behavior
ISSN: 0001-8791
Titre abrégé: J Vocat Behav
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0330465
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
08
09
2021
revised:
20
04
2022
accepted:
18
05
2022
pubmed:
27
5
2022
medline:
27
5
2022
entrez:
26
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Building upon the psychology of working theory (PWT), the goal of the present study was to examine longitudinal relations among precarious work, workplace dignity, and basic need fulfillment (survival, social contribution, and self-determination needs). To examine our hypotheses, we surveyed a group of working adults in the United States three times over three months. However, the study began in March 2020 - before widespread lockdowns, layoffs, and furloughs - and some participants lost their jobs on subsequent waves during April and May 2020. Therefore, a secondary aim of the study was to explore predictors of job loss in the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that having precarious work in early March 2020 significantly predicted job loss due to COVID-19 in May 2020. For workers who remained employed during this time, greater precarious work predicting lower fulfillment of survival needs over time. In addition, workplace dignity and fulfillment of relatedness needs operated reciprocally, predicting greater levels of each other over time, and greater workplace dignity predicted greater fulfillment of social contribution, autonomy, and competence needs across time. These results expand PWT by suggesting that precarious work and workplace dignity are both important work conditions that predict fulfillment of different basic needs over time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35615662
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103739
pii: S0001-8791(22)00050-1
pmc: PMC9122777
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
103739Informations de copyright
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Econ Soc Rev (Irel). 2018 Fall;49(3):241-258
pubmed: 31435077
Psychol Methods. 2002 Jun;7(2):147-77
pubmed: 12090408
J Vocat Behav. 2020 Oct;122:103481
pubmed: 32868953
J Couns Psychol. 2016 Mar;63(2):127-48
pubmed: 26937788
Psychol Methods. 2016 Jun;21(2):137-50
pubmed: 26523435
J Affect Disord. 2017 Aug 15;218:201-209
pubmed: 28477498
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Aug;12(S1):S186-S187
pubmed: 32551757
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 31;7:422
pubmed: 27064844
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Nov;112(4):558-77
pubmed: 14674869
J Couns Psychol. 2019 Mar;66(2):195-209
pubmed: 30714744