Placenta accreta spectrum-A single-center retrospective observational cohort study of multidisciplinary management over time.
blood transfusion
cesarean hysterectomy
multidisciplinary management
placenta accreta spectrum
surgical blood loss
Journal
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
ISSN: 1879-3479
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0210174
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
revised:
15
05
2022
received:
30
11
2021
accepted:
23
05
2022
pubmed:
27
5
2022
medline:
16
9
2022
entrez:
26
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate whether the results of a previous study that showed a decrease in blood loss and transfusions with a multidisciplinary approach, including a fixed team when delivering women diagnosed with placenta accreta spectrum at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, remained low throughout time, and to investigate hospital stay and maternal and neonatal complications during a time period with varying team structure compared with previous periods. A retrospective observational cohort study comparing data from medical records including three cohorts of women diagnosed with placenta accreta spectrum between October 2003 and December 2020. Cohort 1 consisted of women delivered before the multidisciplinary approach was introduced. Cohort 2 and cohort 3 were both managed in a multidisciplinary manner, but while cohort 2 was managed by a fixed team, cohort 3 was managed by several different senior specialists. The data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test. Blood loss and need for transfusion were significantly lower for cohort 3 and cohort 2 compared with cohort 1. No significant difference was found between cohort 3 and cohort 2. The multidisciplinary management and surgical method employed at Sahlgrenska University Hospital have lowered blood loss and the need for transfusions, even over time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35617301
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14285
pmc: PMC9543747
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
270-278Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Références
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Jul;26(10):1007-11
pubmed: 23339591
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):561-8
pubmed: 25460838
Scand J Urol. 2017 Dec;51(6):496-497
pubmed: 28891357
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Mar;140(3):281-290
pubmed: 29405317
BJOG. 2016 Jul;123(8):1348-55
pubmed: 26227006
Scand J Urol. 2017 Dec;51(6):491-495
pubmed: 28728522
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Dec;94(12):1380-6
pubmed: 26344420
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;107(6):1226-32
pubmed: 16738145
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):993-1004
pubmed: 21306277
Reprod Sci. 2014 Jun;21(6):761-71
pubmed: 24336676
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;117(2 Pt 1):331-337
pubmed: 21309195
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;131(2):234-241
pubmed: 29324609
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Oct;159(1):270-278
pubmed: 35617301
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Jun;30(12):1423-1427
pubmed: 27534584
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):654-668
pubmed: 26244528
Scand J Urol. 2018 Jun;52(3):236
pubmed: 29485304
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jun;237:139-144
pubmed: 31039488
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;220(6):511-526
pubmed: 30849356
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52893
pubmed: 23300807
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 19;378(16):1529-1536
pubmed: 29669225
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):218.e1-9
pubmed: 25173187
BJOG. 2019 Jan;126(1):e1-e48
pubmed: 30260097
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):612.e1-612.e5
pubmed: 28213059
PLoS Med. 2014 Oct 21;11(10):e1001747
pubmed: 25334033
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Nov;96(11):1373-1381
pubmed: 28805942