Embryologic outcomes among patients using a microfluidics chip compared to density gradient centrifugation to process sperm: a paired analysis.
Density gradient centrifugation
Euploidy
In vitro fertilization
Microfluidics
Sperm processing
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
21
01
2022
accepted:
21
04
2022
pubmed:
27
5
2022
medline:
13
8
2022
entrez:
26
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate embryologic outcomes among paired IVF cycles in which a microfluidics chip was utilized compared to density gradient centrifugation for sperm processing. This was a retrospective cohort study of 88 paired IVF cycles from patients aged 18-44 years at a university-affiliated IVF center. Fresh cycles from patients undergoing ICSI with sperm processed by a microfluidics chamber (microfluidics cycles) were compared to the same patients' previous ICSI cycles in which sperm was processed via density gradient centrifugation (control cycles). The primary outcome was the high-quality blastulation rate. High-quality blastulation rate per oocyte retrieved was significantly higher in the microfluidics group compared to the control group (21.1% versus 14.5%, p < 0.01) as was the blastulation rate per 2PN (42.7% versus 30.8%, p < 0.01). Fertilization rates were significantly higher in the microfluidics group. The euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved was significantly higher in the microfluidics group compared with the control group (8.5% versus 4.3%, p = 0.04), while the euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was comparable (32.6% versus 21.8%, p = 0.09). In patients with male factor infertility, the high-quality blastulation rate was similar between the control and microfluidics cycles. There was a significantly higher blastulation rate among microfluidics cycles in patients without a diagnosis of male factor infertility (p < 0.01). In this study, several embryologic outcomes, including fertilization rate, high-quality blastulation rate, and euploidy rate, were significantly higher in the microfluidics group compared to the control group. Microfluidics sperm processing may be a way to improve embryologic outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35619041
doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02504-1
pii: 10.1007/s10815-022-02504-1
pmc: PMC9365916
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1523-1529Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Fertil Steril. 2021 Sep;116(3):757-765
pubmed: 34045067
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013 Sep;16(3):175-93
pubmed: 23862664
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2021 Apr;67(2):137-143
pubmed: 33451252
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Oct;36(10):2057-2066
pubmed: 31418108
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Mar;36(3):403-409
pubmed: 30542782
J Reprod Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;56(1-2):12-6
pubmed: 21366121
Hum Reprod. 2018 Aug 1;33(8):1388-1393
pubmed: 30007319
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jun 30;95(8):2531-3
pubmed: 21324455
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Nov;35(11):1953-1968
pubmed: 30206748
Biotechnol Adv. 2020 May - Jun;40:107498
pubmed: 31836499
Zygote. 2022 Apr;30(2):200-205
pubmed: 34313213
Theriogenology. 2016 Apr 15;85(7):1289-96
pubmed: 26777560
Biol Reprod. 2019 Dec 24;101(6):1076-1082
pubmed: 30801632
Hum Reprod Update. 2010 May-Jun;16(3):231-45
pubmed: 19934213
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;11(3):307-11
pubmed: 10369209
J Reprod Infertil. 2019 Jul-Sep;20(3):121-126
pubmed: 31423414
Mol Hum Reprod. 2017 Apr 1;23(4):257-268
pubmed: 28130394
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Nov 29;7:298
pubmed: 31850340
Andrologia. 2019 Nov;51(10):e13403
pubmed: 31434165
Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2020 Jul - Sep;785:108320
pubmed: 32800274
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2003 Nov 14;1:108
pubmed: 14617368
Fertil Steril. 2019 Jul;112(1):54-60.e3
pubmed: 31056315
Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Sep;39(3):372-382
pubmed: 31109895
Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 May;12(5):608-15
pubmed: 16790106
Reprod Sci. 2022 Jun;29(6):1801-1808
pubmed: 34731459