Single Center Oncoplastic Experience and Patient Satisfaction Reported via Patient Reported Outcomes.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
received:
03
12
2021
accepted:
01
04
2022
entrez:
27
5
2022
pubmed:
28
5
2022
medline:
28
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Oncoplastic breast surgery (OPS) is gaining in popularity compared with traditional breast conserving surgery due to wider resections and better satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes. This study analyzed OPS versus traditional breast conserving surgery outcomes: wound complications, reoperations for margins or fat necrosis, and ipsilateral recurrence. This retrospective review compared 191 OPS and traditional breast conserving surgery patients on patient-related factors, primary outcomes, and patient reported outcome measures results. A propensity score method analysis using 1:1 to nearest neighbor was also performed. OPS patients were younger, less likely to be smokers, more likely to be ER+ and PR+, and had larger specimen volumes than did traditional breast conserving surgery patients ( We showed that OPS is a noninferior technique that should be discussed with appropriate patients. Operative planning should involve patient preferences in optimizing long-term cosmetic outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35620494
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004336
pmc: PMC9126515
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e4336Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Références
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2017 Aug 04;9:521-530
pubmed: 28831273
Med J Armed Forces India. 2016 Jan;72(1):12-8
pubmed: 26900217
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3247-58
pubmed: 27357177
Breast. 2018 Jun;39:110-116
pubmed: 29656223
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 15;11(2):e042099
pubmed: 33589456
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Feb;72(2):145-9
pubmed: 23503430
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Jan-Feb;86(1-2):88-91
pubmed: 26332937
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug;22(8):2500-8
pubmed: 25519931
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1518-1526
pubmed: 26017588
Am J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug;38(4):353-7
pubmed: 23799290
Lancet Oncol. 2005 Mar;6(3):145-57
pubmed: 15737831
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3063-3070
pubmed: 31342388
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1227-32
pubmed: 12393819
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Feb;69(2):149-62
pubmed: 26740288
Acta Oncol. 2017 May;56(5):719-723
pubmed: 28162018
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jan;150(1):9-16
pubmed: 25408966
Am J Surg. 2020 Aug;220(2):385-392
pubmed: 31926592
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Sep 06;2:41
pubmed: 30238086
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2790-2794
pubmed: 30003450
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Aug;21(8):e375-e385
pubmed: 32758475
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 May;17(5):1375-91
pubmed: 20140531
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1233-41
pubmed: 12393820
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;26(9):2759-2767
pubmed: 31115853
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Aug 07;6(8):e1904
pubmed: 30254830
Qual Life Res. 1998 May;7(4):291-300
pubmed: 9610213
Ann Surg. 2013 Apr;257(4):609-20
pubmed: 23470508
Am J Surg. 2014 Mar;207(3):398-402; discussion 402
pubmed: 24581764
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Jan;82(1):15-18
pubmed: 30211738
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):345-353
pubmed: 19644246