Catastrophe optics theory unveils the localised wave aberration features that generate ghost images.
catastrophe optics theory
caustics
ghost images
polyplopia
wavefront aberration singular analysis
Journal
Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
ISSN: 1475-1313
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8208839
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
revised:
29
04
2022
received:
01
12
2021
accepted:
29
04
2022
pubmed:
28
5
2022
medline:
10
8
2022
entrez:
27
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Monocular polyplopia (ghost or multiple images) is a serious visual impediment for some people who report seeing two (diplopia), three (triplopia) or even more images. Polyplopia is expected to appear if the point spread function (PSF) has multiple intensity cores (a dense concentration of a large portion of the radiant flux contained in the PSF) relatively separated from each other, each of which contributes to a distinct image. We present a theory that assigns these multiple PSF cores to specific features of aberrated wavefronts, thereby accounting optically for the perceptual phenomenon of monocular polyplopia. The theory provides two major conclusions. First, the most likely event giving rise to multiple PSF cores is the presence of hyperbolic, or less probably elliptical, umbilic caustics (using the terminology of catastrophe optics). Second, those umbilic caustics formed on the retinal surface are associated with certain points of the wave aberration function, called cusps of Gauss, where the gradient of a curvature function vanishes. However, not all cusps of Gauss generate those umbilic caustics. We also provide necessary conditions for those cusps of Gauss to be fertile. To show the potential of this theoretical framework for understanding the nature and origin of polyplopia, we provide specific examples of ocular wave aberration functions that induce diplopia and triplopia. The polyplopia effects in these examples are illustrated by depicting the multi-core PSFs and the convolved retinal images for clinical letter charts, both through computer simulations and through experimental recording using an adaptive optics set-up. The number and location of cores in the PSF is thus a potentially useful metric for the existence and severity of polyplopia in spatial vision. These examples also help explain why physiological pupil constriction might reduce the incidence of ghosting and multiple images of daily objects that affect vision with dilated pupils. This mechanistic explanation suggests a possible role for optical phase-masking as a clinical treatment for polyplopia and ghosting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35620968
doi: 10.1111/opo.13008
pmc: PMC9543491
doi:
Substances chimiques
Caustics
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1074-1091Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.
Références
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 Sep;37(5):602-609
pubmed: 28681436
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Feb;91(2):221-30
pubmed: 24270635
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2019 Apr 1;36(4):B58-B64
pubmed: 31044956
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2019 Apr 1;36(4):B97-B102
pubmed: 31044967
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Mar 1;58(3):1758-1763
pubmed: 28324117
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Feb;39(1):38-46
pubmed: 26228543
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Sep;42(5):1074-1091
pubmed: 35620968
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Jun;25(6):808-13
pubmed: 10374162
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:154593
pubmed: 24324954
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Oct;39(10):1477-84
pubmed: 23860009
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed). 2021 Nov;96 Suppl 1:68-73
pubmed: 34836591
Opt Lett. 2020 Oct 15;45(20):5656-5659
pubmed: 33057251
Opt Express. 2009 Sep 28;17(20):17279-92
pubmed: 19907514
Biomed Opt Express. 2016 Jun 09;7(7):2538-50
pubmed: 27446688
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1978 Dec;55(12):818-23
pubmed: 753109
Appl Opt. 2006 Jun 10;45(17):4184-95
pubmed: 16761062
Biomed Opt Express. 2016 Sep 15;7(10):4102-4113
pubmed: 27867718
Optom Vis Sci. 1998 Mar;75(3):197-207
pubmed: 9547801
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 17;11(1):3597
pubmed: 32681123
Eye Contact Lens. 2012 Jul;38(4):252-9
pubmed: 22735627
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1981 Apr;59(2):271-4
pubmed: 7257745
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015 Sep;35(5):476-99
pubmed: 26303445
J Vis. 2011 Nov 22;11(13):20
pubmed: 22108058
Optom Vis Sci. 1992 Jun;69(6):486-8
pubmed: 1641233
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018 Jan;38(1):26-36
pubmed: 29265469
Cornea. 1998 Mar;17(2):169-73
pubmed: 9520193
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019 Jul;39(4):232-244
pubmed: 31172533
J Optom. 2018 Jul - Sep;11(3):144-152
pubmed: 29292240
Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;82(12):1071-8
pubmed: 16357650
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002 Dec;19(12):2329-48
pubmed: 12469728
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Jul;25(7):995-1003
pubmed: 10404379
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006 Jan;26(1):65-70
pubmed: 16390484
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2019 Nov 1;36(11):1820-1828
pubmed: 31873686