Impact of Salvage Surgery following Colonic Endoscopic Polypectomy for Patients with Invasive Neoplasia.
colorectal neoplasia
endoscopic resection
salvage surgery
Journal
Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)
ISSN: 1718-7729
Titre abrégé: Curr Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9502503
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 04 2022
29 04 2022
Historique:
received:
15
03
2022
revised:
20
04
2022
accepted:
26
04
2022
entrez:
27
5
2022
pubmed:
28
5
2022
medline:
1
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Invasive neoplasia (Tis-T1) are increasingly being encountered in the daily routine of endoscopic polypectomy. However, the need for salvage surgery following endoscopic therapy for invasive neoplasia is controversially discussed. Patients with endoscopic removal of invasive neoplasia were identified from the national Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database 2005 to 2015. Survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis in cancer-specific mortality and overall survival rate was used, which were stratified by T stage and polyp size. A total of 5805 patients with endoscopic removal of invasive neoplasia were included in the analysis, of whom 1214 (20.9%) underwent endoscopic treatment alone and 4591 (79.1%) underwent endoscopic resection plus surgery. The survival analysis revealed that patients undergoing salvage surgery had a significantly better cancer-specific survival (97.4% vs. 95.8%, Salvage surgery following endoscopic polypectomy may improve the oncological survival of patients with invasive neoplasia, especially in patients with T1 stage. Furthermore, the T stage, size, and localization of polyps, as well as the level of CEA, could be identified as significant predictors for lymphonodal and distant metastases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Invasive neoplasia (Tis-T1) are increasingly being encountered in the daily routine of endoscopic polypectomy. However, the need for salvage surgery following endoscopic therapy for invasive neoplasia is controversially discussed.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients with endoscopic removal of invasive neoplasia were identified from the national Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database 2005 to 2015. Survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis in cancer-specific mortality and overall survival rate was used, which were stratified by T stage and polyp size.
RESULTS
A total of 5805 patients with endoscopic removal of invasive neoplasia were included in the analysis, of whom 1214 (20.9%) underwent endoscopic treatment alone and 4591 (79.1%) underwent endoscopic resection plus surgery. The survival analysis revealed that patients undergoing salvage surgery had a significantly better cancer-specific survival (97.4% vs. 95.8%,
CONCLUSION
Salvage surgery following endoscopic polypectomy may improve the oncological survival of patients with invasive neoplasia, especially in patients with T1 stage. Furthermore, the T stage, size, and localization of polyps, as well as the level of CEA, could be identified as significant predictors for lymphonodal and distant metastases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35621645
pii: curroncol29050255
doi: 10.3390/curroncol29050255
pmc: PMC9139913
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3138-3148Références
Gastroenterology. 1995 Jun;108(6):1657-65
pubmed: 7768369
Gastroenterology. 1985 Aug;89(2):328-36
pubmed: 4007423
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov;115(11):1751-1767
pubmed: 33156093
Ann Oncol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1291-1305
pubmed: 32702383
Gastroenterology. 2013 Mar;144(3):551-9; quiz e14
pubmed: 23232297
Endoscopy. 2018 May;50(5):479-486
pubmed: 29228402
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2019 Jan 29;3(1):18-26
pubmed: 31559363
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):894-902
pubmed: 27214731
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):687-96
pubmed: 22356322
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):733-740.e2
pubmed: 25708762
Am J Med. 2005 Dec;118(12):1413
pubmed: 16378787
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Nov;47(11):1789-96; discussion 1796-7
pubmed: 15622570
Gastroenterology. 2020 Sep;159(3):904-914.e12
pubmed: 32437747
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Aug;52(8):1502-15
pubmed: 19617768
Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):270-297
pubmed: 28212588
Gastroenterology. 1995 Dec;109(6):1801-7
pubmed: 7498644
N Engl J Med. 1988 Sep 1;319(9):525-32
pubmed: 2841597
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr 21;14(15):2364-9
pubmed: 18416463