Wing Planform Effect on the Aerodynamics of Insect Wings.
aerodynamics
flapping wings
insect flight
leading-edge vortex
wing planform
Journal
Insects
ISSN: 2075-4450
Titre abrégé: Insects
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101574235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 May 2022
13 May 2022
Historique:
received:
05
04
2022
revised:
30
04
2022
accepted:
11
05
2022
entrez:
27
5
2022
pubmed:
28
5
2022
medline:
28
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study investigates the effect of wing planform shape on the aerodynamic performance of insect wings by numerically solving the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. We define the wing planforms using a beta-function distribution and employ kinematics representative of normal hovering flight. In particular, we use three primary parameters to describe the planform geometry: aspect ratio, radial centroid location, and wing root offset. The force coefficients, flow structures, and aerodynamic efficiency for different wing planforms at a Reynolds number of 100 are evaluated. It is found that the wing with the lowest aspect ratio of 1.5 results in the highest peaks of lift and drag coefficients during stroke reversals, whereas the higher aspect ratio wings produce higher lift and drag coefficients during mid half-stroke translation. For the wings considered, the leading-edge vortex detachment is found to be approximately at a location that is 3.5-5 mean chord lengths from the wing center of rotation for all aspect ratios and root offsets investigated. Consequently, the detachment area increases with the increase of aspect ratio and root offset, resulting in reduced aerodynamic coefficients. The radial centroid location is found to influence the local flow evolution time, and this results in earlier formation/detachment of the leading-edge vortex for wings with a smaller radial centroid location. Overall, the best performance, when considering both average lift coefficient and efficiency, is found at the intermediate aspect ratios of 4.5-6; increasing the centroid location mainly increases efficiency; and increasing the root offset leads to a decreased average lift coefficient whilst leading to relatively small variations in aerodynamic efficiency for most aspect ratios.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35621794
pii: insects13050459
doi: 10.3390/insects13050459
pmc: PMC9145969
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Leverhulme Trust
ID : RPG-2019-366
Références
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Jul;14(132):
pubmed: 28747395
J Exp Biol. 2009 Aug;212(Pt 16):2705-19
pubmed: 19648415
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 07;10(8):e0134972
pubmed: 26252657
J Exp Biol. 2002 Jan;205(Pt 1):55-70
pubmed: 11818412
J Exp Biol. 2008 Jan;211(Pt 2):234-8
pubmed: 18165251
J R Soc Interface. 2015 Apr 6;12(105):
pubmed: 25788539
Bioinspir Biomim. 2015 Aug 07;10(4):044002
pubmed: 26248884
J Theor Biol. 2016 Oct 7;406:187-91
pubmed: 27329340
J R Soc Interface. 2014 Feb 12;11(93):20131196
pubmed: 24522785
J Exp Biol. 2003 Jul;206(Pt 13):2257-72
pubmed: 12771174
J R Soc Interface. 2010 Mar 6;7(44):485-97
pubmed: 19692394
Bioinspir Biomim. 2015 Oct 09;10(5):056020
pubmed: 26451802
J Exp Biol. 2016 Apr;219(Pt 7):920-32
pubmed: 27030773
J Exp Biol. 2010 Jul 1;213(Pt 13):2273-83
pubmed: 20543126
Insects. 2020 Jul 23;11(8):
pubmed: 32718051
Interface Focus. 2017 Feb 6;7(1):20160084
pubmed: 28163876
J R Soc Interface. 2018 Jun;15(143):
pubmed: 29925578
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Sep 22;8(9):210452
pubmed: 34567586
J Exp Biol. 2002 Jun;205(Pt 11):1565-76
pubmed: 12000801
Science. 1999 Jun 18;284(5422):1954-60
pubmed: 10373107
Bioinspir Biomim. 2016 Sep 09;11(5):056013
pubmed: 27608653
J Exp Biol. 2004 Mar;207(Pt 7):1137-50
pubmed: 14978056
J Exp Biol. 2004 Mar;207(Pt 7):1063-72
pubmed: 14978049
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 22;279(1729):722-31
pubmed: 21831896