Minimum 2-year results of the second-generation CFR-PEEK locking plate on the proximal humeral fracture.
PEEK
Proximal Humeral Fracture
Shoulder Surgery
Titanium Alloy Locking Plate
Trauma
Journal
European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie
ISSN: 1432-1068
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9518037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
received:
12
02
2022
accepted:
15
05
2022
medline:
26
4
2023
pubmed:
28
5
2022
entrez:
27
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the 24-month range of motion results of patients treated with CFR-PEEK2 versus conventional titanium plate osteosyntheses (TAL-P). We hypothesized similar clinical outcomes but a better range of motion in the CFR-PEEK2 group than the TAL-P group in the 2-year follow-up. This retrospective study analysing prospectively collected data included all patients that presented with a PHF and were treated with CFR-PEEK2 between November 2016 and April 2018. Follow-up was performed after a minimum of 24 months, evaluating the functional degree of movement functional scores, including the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) as well as an age- and sex-adapted Constant-Murley score (CMS). The 2-year results were compared to the results of a matched pair group comprising patients that were treated with TAL-P during the same period. Of the 35 patients included (mean age: 61.2 [18-78] years), 30 (86%) patients completed the 24-month follow-up in the CFR-PEEK2-group. After 24 months, the mean CMS was 89.9 points (pt) (44.5-100 pt) and the mean SSV was 86.7% (35-100%). Compared to the matched-pair TAL-P cohort, the 24-month follow-up showed similar results (CMS: 88.6 pt. (40.5-100 pt.) [p = 0.9]; SSV: 76% (30-100%) [p = 0.05]). However, significantly better degrees of forward flexion and internal rotation as well as a better range of motion in abduction was recorded in patients treated with CFR-PEEK2 plates than TAL-P. At the 24-month follow-up, patients who received treatment with CFR-PEEK2 compared to those that received TAL-P showed enhanced range of motion whilst having similar clinical scores.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35622161
doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03298-9
pii: 10.1007/s00590-022-03298-9
doi:
Substances chimiques
polyetheretherketone
31694-16-3
Polymers
0
Benzophenones
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1307-1314Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Court-Brown CM, Clement ND, Duckworth AD et al (2017) The changing epidemiology of fall-related fractures in adults. Injury 48:819–824
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.021
pubmed: 28283181
Dey Hazra RO, Illner J, Szewczyk K et al (2022) Age-independent clinical outcome in proximal humeral fractures: 2-year results using the example of a precontoured locking plate. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020408
doi: 10.3390/jcm11020408
pubmed: 35054102
pmcid: 8781715
Meier RA, Messmer P, Regazzoni P et al (2006) Unexpected high complication rate following internal fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures with an angled blade plate. J Orthop Trauma 20:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200604000-00004
doi: 10.1097/00005131-200604000-00004
pubmed: 16721240
Agudelo J, Schürmann M, Stahel P et al (2007) Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates. J Orthop Trauma 21:676–681. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815bb09d
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815bb09d
pubmed: 17986883
Lorenz G, Schönthaler W, Huf W et al (2021) Complication rate after operative treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: locking plate osteosynthesis versus proximal humeral nail. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 47:2055–2064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01380-7
doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01380-7
pubmed: 32448941
Dauwe J, Walters G, Holzer LA et al (2020) Failure after proximal humeral fracture osteosynthesis: a one year analysis of hospital-related healthcare cost. Int Orthop 44:1217–1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04577-y
doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04577-y
pubmed: 32342142
Kristensen MR, Rasmussen JV, Elmengaard B et al (2018) High risk for revision after shoulder arthroplasty for failed osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures: a matched pair analysis of 285 cases from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop 89:345–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1450207
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1450207
pubmed: 29537342
pmcid: 6055779
Sebastia-Forcada E, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Cebrian-Gomez R et al (2017) Outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: primary arthroplasty versus secondary arthroplasty after failed proximal humeral locking plate fixation. J Orthop Trauma 31:e236–e240. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000858
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000858
pubmed: 28430721
Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M et al (2008) Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA Types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma 22:159–164. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318169ef2a
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318169ef2a
pubmed: 18317048
Nakahara I, Takao M, Goto T et al (2012) Interfacial shear strength of bioactive-coated carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone after in vivo implantation. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc 30:1618–1625. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22115
doi: 10.1002/jor.22115
Dey Hazra R-O, Blach RM, Ellwein A et al (2021) Latest trends in the current treatment of proximal humeral fractures—an analysis of 1162 cases at a level-1 trauma centre with a special focus on shoulder surgery. Z Orthop Unfall. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1333-3951
doi: 10.1055/a-1333-3951
pubmed: 33530111
Katthagen JC, Huber M, Grabowski S, Ellwein A (2017) Failure and revision rates of proximal humeral fracture treatment with the use of a standardized treatment algorithm at a level-1 trauma center. J Orthop Traumatol 18:265–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-017-0457-8
doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0457-8
pubmed: 28421293
pmcid: 5585092
Feerick EM, McGarry JP (2013) Using computational simulation for analysis and development of next-generation orthopaedic devices. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:440–442. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-21-07-440
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-07-440
pubmed: 23818032
Schliemann B, Hartensuer R, Koch T et al (2015) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with a CFR-PEEK plate: 2-year results of a prospective study and comparison to fixation with a conventional locking plate. J Shoulder Elb Surg 24:1282–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.12.028
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.12.028
Rotini R, Cavaciocchi M, Fabbri D et al (2015) Proximal humeral fracture fixation: multicenter study with carbon fiber peek plate. Musculoskelet Surg 99(Suppl 1):S1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-015-0371-2
doi: 10.1007/s12306-015-0371-2
pubmed: 25962808
Katthagen JC, Schwarze M, Warnhoff M et al (2016) Influence of plate material and screw design on stiffness and ultimate load of locked plating in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures. Injury. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.004
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.004
pubmed: 26804939
Ziegler P, Maier S, Stöckle U et al (2019) The treatment of proximal humerus fracture using internal fixation with fixed-angle plates. Dtsch Aerzteblatt Online 116:757–763. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2019.0757
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0757
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power for the social sciences. Laurence Erlbaum Assoc, Hillsdale
Gignac GE, Szodorai ET (2016) Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Pers Individ Differ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
Barlow JD, Logli AL, Steinmann SP et al (2019) Locking-plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures in patients over 60 continues to be associated with a high complication rate. J Shoulder Elb Surg 28:e213–e214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.11.028
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.11.028
Katthagen JC, Huber M, Grabowski S et al (2017) Failure and revision rates of proximal humeral fracture treatment with the use of a standardized treatment algorithm at a level-1 trauma center. J Orthop Traumatol 18:265–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-017-0457-8
doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0457-8
pubmed: 28421293
pmcid: 5585092
Robinson CM, Stirling PHC, Goudie EB et al (2019) Complications and long-term outcomes of open reduction and plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Jt Surg - Am 101:2129–2139. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00595
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00595
Katthagen JC, Hennecke D, Jensen G et al (2014) Arthroscopy after locked plating of proximal humeral fractures: implant removal, capsular release, and intra-articular findings. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 30:1061–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.04.092
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.04.092
Lill H, Hepp P, Korner J et al (2003) Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-002-0465-9
doi: 10.1007/s00402-002-0465-9
pubmed: 12721684
Katthagen JC, Ellwein A, Lutz O et al (2017) Outcomes of proximal humeral fracture fixation with locked CFR-PEEK plating. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1891-7
doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1891-7
pubmed: 27915444
Padolino A, Porcellini G, Guollo B et al (2018) Comparison of CFR-PEEK and conventional titanium locking plates for proximal humeral fractures: a retrospective controlled study of patient outcomes. Musculoskelet Surg 102:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-018-0562-8
doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0562-8
pubmed: 30343471
Ziegler P, Maier S, Stöckle U et al (2019) The treatment of proximal humerus fracture using internal fixation with fixed-angle plates. Dtsch Arztebl Int 116:757–763. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2019.0757
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0757
pubmed: 31775999
pmcid: 6916705
Schliemann B, Seifert R, Theisen C et al (2017) PEEK versus titanium locking plates for proximal humerus fracture fixation: a comparative biomechanical study in two- and three-part fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2620-8
doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2620-8
pubmed: 28005168
Foruria AM, Martinez-Catalan N, Valencia M et al (2021) Proximal humeral fracture locking plate fixation with anatomic reduction, and a short-and-cemented-screws configuration, dramatically reduces the implant related failure rate in elderly patients. JSES Int 5:992–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.06.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.06.004
pubmed: 34766075
pmcid: 8568824