Risk Assessment of Dietary Exposure to Organophosphorus Flame Retardants in Children by Using HBM-Data.
HBM4EU
children
dietary exposure
organophosphorus flame retardants
Journal
Toxics
ISSN: 2305-6304
Titre abrégé: Toxics
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101639637
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 May 2022
03 May 2022
Historique:
received:
31
03
2022
revised:
26
04
2022
accepted:
27
04
2022
entrez:
27
5
2022
pubmed:
28
5
2022
medline:
28
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Due to their extensive usage, organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) have been detected in humans and in the environment. Human are exposed to OPFRs via inhalation of indoor air, dust uptake or dietary uptake through contaminated food and drinking water. Only recently, few studies addressing dietary exposure to OPFRs were published. In this study, we used human biomonitoring (HBM) data of OPFRs to estimate how much the dietary intake may contribute to the total exposure. We estimated by reverse dosimetry, the daily intake of tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP), tris (1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TCIPP), tris (1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCIPP) for children using HBM data from studies with sampling sites in Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Slovenia and Slovakia. For estimating the dietary exposure, a deterministic approach was chosen. The occurrence data of selected food categories were used from a published Belgium food basket study. Since the occurrence data were left-censored, the Lower bound (LB)-Upper bound (UB) approach was used. The estimated daily intake (EDI) calculated on the basis of urine metabolite concentrations ranged from 0.03 to 0.18 µg/kg bw/d for TDCIPP, from 0.05 to 0.17 µg/kg bw/d for TCIPP and from 0.02 to 0.2 µg/kg bw/d for TCEP. Based on national food consumption data and occurrence data, the estimated dietary intake for TDCIPP ranged from 0.005 to 0.09 µg/kg bw/d, for TCIPP ranged from 0.037 to 0.2 µg/kg bw/d and for TCEP ranged from 0.007 to 0.018 µg/kg bw/d (summarized for all countries). The estimated dietary intake of TDCIPP contributes 11-173% to the EDI, depending on country and LB-UB scenario. The estimated dietary uptake of TCIPP was in all calculations, except in Belgium and France, above 100%. In the case of TCEP, it is assumed that the dietary intake ranges from 6 to 57%. The EDI and the estimated dietary intake contribute less than 3% to the reference dose (RfD). Therefore, the estimated exposure to OPFRs indicates a minimal health risk based on the current knowledge of available exposure, kinetic and toxicity data. We were able to show that the dietary exposure can have an impact on the general exposure based on our underlying exposure scenarios.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35622647
pii: toxics10050234
doi: 10.3390/toxics10050234
pmc: PMC9144966
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
ID : 733032, HBM4EU
Références
J Urol. 1989 Apr;141(4):918-20
pubmed: 2926890
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011 Jan;55(1):7-31
pubmed: 20564479
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 1;771:144752
pubmed: 33540161
Food Chem Toxicol. 2019 Dec;134:110812
pubmed: 31505235
Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2019 Nov 12;6(11):638-649
pubmed: 32494578
Chemosphere. 2016 Jun;153:78-90
pubmed: 27010170
Environ Int. 2014 Oct;71:158-63
pubmed: 25033099
J Hazard Mater. 2021 Sep 15;418:126279
pubmed: 34329041
Environ Int. 2017 May;102:236-243
pubmed: 28335995
Chemosphere. 2012 Aug;88(10):1119-53
pubmed: 22537891
Environ Int. 2021 Jan;146:106147
pubmed: 33137702
Food Chem Toxicol. 2017 Feb;100:1-7
pubmed: 27965106
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2019 Jun 5;170:169-175
pubmed: 30927662
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Jul 19;50(14):7752-60
pubmed: 27350238
Drug Metab Dispos. 1981 Sep-Oct;9(5):434-41
pubmed: 6117442
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Feb 20;52(4):2331-2338
pubmed: 29376341
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021 Aug;237:113809
pubmed: 34455198
Public Health Nutr. 2009 Oct;12(10):1912-23
pubmed: 19232152
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 1;625:1056-1064
pubmed: 29996402
Environ Int. 2020 Jan;134:105321
pubmed: 31783242
Environ Int. 2019 Jun;127:35-51
pubmed: 30901640
Chemosphere. 2012 Sep;88(11):1276-82
pubmed: 22551874