Assessing the impact of selective licencing schemes for private rental housing on mental health and well-being: protocol for a mixed-method natural experiment study in Greater London, UK.
epidemiology
public health
social medicine
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 05 2022
27 05 2022
Historique:
entrez:
27
5
2022
pubmed:
28
5
2022
medline:
1
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The UK private rental housing market has poorer quality housing compared with other sectors and is subjected to calls for better regulation. Poor quality housing poses risks to mental and physical health, and housing improvement can potentially benefit health and well-being. Local authorities have powers to implement selective licencing (SL) schemes in specific localities. Such schemes involve landlord registration, payment of licence fees, local authority inspection and requirements that landlords conduct any necessary renovation works to ensure housing standards are met. We aim to evaluate SL in Greater London and to test the feasibility of a national evaluation. We will measure individual-level and area-level impacts of SL in Greater London between 2011 and 2019. A difference-in-differences approach with propensity score-matched controls will be used. We propose to exploit data from the Annual Population Survey (APS) and health and social benefit registers to measure mental health and well-being at individual (self-reported anxiety) and area (Small Area Mental Health Index) level. We estimate 633 APS participants in our intervention groups compared with 1899 participants in control areas (1:3 ratio of intervention to control). Secondary outcomes will be self-reported well-being and residential stability at the individual level and incidence of police-recorded antisocial behaviour calls and population turnover at the area level. The study size of the area-level analyses will be 3684 lower layer super output areas (including controls). Qualitative semistructured interviews with lead implementers in several London boroughs will produce insights into variations and commonalities between schemes. Ethical approval was obtained from London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine's Ethics Committee (reference number 26481) and London Borough of Hackney. All interviewees will be asked for informed written consent. Study findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35623746
pii: bmjopen-2021-057711
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057711
pmc: PMC9150155
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e057711Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T032499/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Health Place. 2015 May;33:101-8
pubmed: 25814338
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Jan;69(1):12-9
pubmed: 25205160
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:39-56
pubmed: 28125392
Health Place. 2011 Jan;17(1):175-84
pubmed: 21159542
J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Jun 1;41(2):e121-e132
pubmed: 30137569
Stat Med. 2021 Mar 30;40(7):1718-1735
pubmed: 33377193
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Mar;152:41-9
pubmed: 26829008
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Mar;74(3):211-218
pubmed: 31915239
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD008657
pubmed: 23450585
BMJ. 2020 Feb 24;368:m693
pubmed: 32094110