Lysosomal lipid switch sensitises to nutrient deprivation and mTOR targeting in pancreatic cancer.
Animals
Mice
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal
/ drug therapy
Cell Line, Tumor
Cell Proliferation
Glutamine
/ metabolism
Lipids
/ biosynthesis
Lysosomes
/ metabolism
Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1
/ metabolism
Nutrients
Pancreatic Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
/ genetics
Signal Transduction
TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
/ metabolism
Everolimus
/ therapeutic use
MTOR Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Glutaminase
Pancreatic Neoplasms
AMINO ACIDS
CELL BIOLOGY
LIPID METABOLISM
PANCREATIC CANCER
SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
Journal
Gut
ISSN: 1468-3288
Titre abrégé: Gut
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985108R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2023
02 2023
Historique:
received:
10
05
2021
accepted:
07
05
2022
pubmed:
28
5
2022
medline:
10
1
2023
entrez:
27
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive disease with limited therapeutic options. However, metabolic adaptation to the harsh PDAC environment can expose liabilities useful for therapy. Targeting the key metabolic regulator mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) and its downstream pathway shows efficacy only in subsets of patients but gene modifiers maximising response remain to be identified. Three independent cohorts of PDAC patients were studied to correlate PI3K-C2γ protein abundance with disease outcome. Mechanisms were then studied in mouse (KPC mice) and cellular models of PDAC, in presence or absence of PI3K-C2γ (WT or KO). PI3K-C2γ-dependent metabolic rewiring and its impact on mTORC1 regulation were assessed in conditions of limiting glutamine availability. Finally, effects of a combination therapy targeting mTORC1 and glutamine metabolism were studied in WT and KO PDAC cells and preclinical models. PI3K-C2γ expression was reduced in about 30% of PDAC cases and was associated with an aggressive phenotype. Similarly, loss of PI3K-C2γ in KPC mice enhanced tumour development and progression. The increased aggressiveness of tumours lacking PI3K-C2γ correlated with hyperactivation of mTORC1 pathway and glutamine metabolism rewiring to support lipid synthesis. PI3K-C2γ-KO tumours failed to adapt to metabolic stress induced by glutamine depletion, resulting in cell death. Loss of PI3K-C2γ prevents mTOR inactivation and triggers tumour vulnerability to RAD001 (mTOR inhibitor) and BPTES/CB-839 (glutaminase inhibitors). Therefore, these results might open the way to personalised treatments in PDAC with PI3K-C2γ loss.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35623884
pii: gutjnl-2021-325117
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325117
pmc: PMC9872233
doi:
Substances chimiques
Glutamine
0RH81L854J
Lipids
0
Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1
EC 2.7.11.1
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
EC 2.7.1.-
TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
EC 2.7.11.1
PIK3C2A protein, human
EC 2.7.1.137
Everolimus
9HW64Q8G6G
MTOR Inhibitors
0
bis-2-(5-phenylacetamido-1,2,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)ethyl sulfide
0
Glutaminase
EC 3.5.1.2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
360-371Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: EH is a founder of Kither Biotech, a company involved in the development of PI3K inhibitors. The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Références
Oncogene. 2010 Jan 21;29(3):313-24
pubmed: 19881548
Cancer Cell. 2005 May;7(5):469-83
pubmed: 15894267
J Biol Chem. 2020 Mar 6;295(10):2890-2899
pubmed: 32019866
J Biol Chem. 2019 Nov 15;294(46):17354-17370
pubmed: 31591270
Nat Genet. 2015 Oct;47(10):1168-78
pubmed: 26343385
Cancer Discov. 2012 May;2(5):401-4
pubmed: 22588877
Science. 2015 Jan 9;347(6218):194-8
pubmed: 25567907
Cancer Cell. 2017 Aug 14;32(2):185-203.e13
pubmed: 28810144
Nat Cancer. 2020 Nov;1(11):1097-1112
pubmed: 34296197
Eur J Med Chem. 2019 Feb 1;163:215-242
pubmed: 30522056
Cancer Cell. 2017 Oct 9;32(4):444-459.e7
pubmed: 29017056
Nat Commun. 2017 Jul 03;8:15965
pubmed: 28671190
Cell Metab. 2016 Jan 12;23(1):27-47
pubmed: 26771115
Nat Cell Biol. 2019 Jan;21(1):63-71
pubmed: 30602761
Gut. 2016 Apr;65(4):647-57
pubmed: 25601637
Cell Stress. 2018 Nov 15;2(12):332-339
pubmed: 31225458
Science. 2021 Dec 10;374(6573):eabk0410
pubmed: 34882480
Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2021 Jun;62:64-81
pubmed: 33721588
Cell Cycle. 2016;15(6):781-6
pubmed: 26901143
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019 Sep;20(9):515-534
pubmed: 31110302
Nat Genet. 2020 Feb;52(2):231-240
pubmed: 31932696
J Biol Chem. 1998 Nov 13;273(46):30497-508
pubmed: 9804818
J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 31;275(13):9653-63
pubmed: 10734117
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30
pubmed: 31912902
Cancer Discov. 2015 Dec;5(12):1247-61
pubmed: 26534901
Nature. 2016 Mar 3;531(7592):47-52
pubmed: 26909576
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020 Apr;21(4):183-203
pubmed: 31937935
Curr Biol. 2014 Oct 6;24(19):2274-80
pubmed: 25220053
Cell. 2017 Mar 9;168(6):960-976
pubmed: 28283069
Nat Commun. 2015 Jun 23;6:7400
pubmed: 26100075
Nat Cell Biol. 2019 Sep;21(9):1093-1101
pubmed: 31451768
Cancer Res. 2020 Apr 15;80(8):1630-1643
pubmed: 31911550
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 10;27(2):193-8
pubmed: 19047305
Trends Cell Biol. 2019 Apr;29(4):339-359
pubmed: 30691999
Front Oncol. 2018 Apr 23;8:126
pubmed: 29740540
Science. 2017 Jun 2;356(6341):968-972
pubmed: 28572395
Cell Res. 2019 Sep;29(9):725-738
pubmed: 31273297
Br J Cancer. 2018 Feb 6;118(3):366-377
pubmed: 29384525
Nature. 2013 Apr 4;496(7443):101-5
pubmed: 23535601
Nat Rev Cancer. 2016 Oct;16(10):619-34
pubmed: 27492215
Sci Signal. 2013 Apr 02;6(269):pl1
pubmed: 23550210
Cancer Res. 2006 Jan 1;66(1):95-106
pubmed: 16397221
Biochem J. 2011 Mar 1;434(2):265-74
pubmed: 21204784
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 31;10:360
pubmed: 32296634
Genome Med. 2020 Sep 29;12(1):80
pubmed: 32988401