Intra-Articular Injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma Is More Effective than Hyaluronic Acid or Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective, Randomized, Triple-Parallel Clinical Trial.

glucocorticosteroids injections intra-articular knee osteoarthritis osteoarthritis platelet-rich plasma viscosupplementation

Journal

Biomedicines
ISSN: 2227-9059
Titre abrégé: Biomedicines
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101691304

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Apr 2022
Historique:
received: 23 03 2022
revised: 22 04 2022
accepted: 23 04 2022
entrez: 28 5 2022
pubmed: 29 5 2022
medline: 29 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Purpose: To prospectively compare the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with hyaluronic acid (HA) and glucocorticosteroid (CS) control groups for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in a randomized, triple-parallel, single-center clinical trial. Methods: A total of 75 patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving a single injection of either leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma (25 knees), hyaluronic acid (25 knees), or glucocorticosteroid (25 knees). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score was collected at baseline and 6, 12, and 26 weeks after treatment. Results: After 6 weeks of PRP administration, a decrease in the mean WOMAC value was observed in all three study groups. Three months after administration, the greatest decrease in the mean WOMAC value was obtained in the PRP group. The results in the HA and CS groups were similar (p = 0.681). In the one-way analysis of variance and post hoc analysis using the HSD Tukey test, a significantly greater improvement was shown by comparing the PRP and CS groups (p = 0.001), and the PRP and HA groups (p = 0.010). After intra-articular injection of CS, the reduction in pain was greatest 6 weeks after administration, and the mean value was the lowest among all groups. During subsequent visits, the value of the pain subscale increased, and after 6 months, it was the highest among the studied groups. Using the Wilcoxon paired test, no PRP effect was found to reduce stiffness at the 6-month follow-up (p = 0.908). Functional improvement was achieved in all groups, i.e., a decrease in the value of this subscale 6 months after administration. The largest decrease was seen in the group that received PRP (p < 0.001) and then in the HA group. The smallest decrease among the investigated methods was shown in the CS group. Conclusions: Intra-articular injections of PRP can provide clinically significant functional improvement for at least 6 months in patients with mild to moderate KOA which is superior to HA or CS injections.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35625728
pii: biomedicines10050991
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10050991
pmc: PMC9138252
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 May 16;100(10):827-834
pubmed: 29762277
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Feb;72(2):220-233
pubmed: 31908163
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017 May;13(5):302-311
pubmed: 28381830
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):339-346
pubmed: 28146403
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Oct;25(10):703-714
pubmed: 28953085
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 23;22(11):
pubmed: 34071037
Obes Rev. 2014 Jul;15(7):578-86
pubmed: 24751192
Arthroscopy. 2014 Jan;30(1):65-71
pubmed: 24290788
Scand J Surg. 2019 Dec;108(4):329-337
pubmed: 30474493
Arthroscopy. 2021 Jan;37(1):292-306
pubmed: 32305424
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):884-91
pubmed: 26831629
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):958-965
pubmed: 26233594
Exp Ther Med. 2018 Mar;15(3):3096-3102
pubmed: 29599843
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Feb;25(2):485-492
pubmed: 27056686
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):347-354
pubmed: 30545242
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Jan;49(1):249-260
pubmed: 32302218
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1575-82
pubmed: 25952818
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Nov;19(11):1270-85
pubmed: 21907813
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2362-70
pubmed: 21856929
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002 Nov-Dec;20(6):773-81
pubmed: 12508768
J Stem Cells Regen Med. 2016 Nov 29;12(2):69-78
pubmed: 28096631
Radiology. 2019 Dec;293(3):656-663
pubmed: 31617798
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jul 30;21(15):
pubmed: 32751537
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):356-64
pubmed: 23299850
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Mar;69(3):483-9
pubmed: 19762361

Auteurs

Dawid Szwedowski (D)

Orthopedic Arthroscopic Surgery International (O.A.S.I.) Bioresearch Foundation, Gobbi N.P.O., 20133 Milan, Italy.
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Provincial Polyclinical Hospital, 87-100 Torun, Poland.

Ali Mobasheri (A)

Research Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.
Department of Regenerative Medicine, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Santariskiu 5, LT-08406 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Departments of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Joint Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.

Andrzej Moniuszko (A)

Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Unit, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.

Jan Zabrzyński (J)

Department of General Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal Oncology and Trauma Surgery, University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.

Sławomir Jeka (S)

Department and Clinic of Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, University Hospital No. 2, Collegium Medicum UMK, 85-168 Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Classifications MeSH