Dental and Maxillofacial Cone Beam CT-High Number of Incidental Findings and Their Impact on Follow-Up and Therapy Management.
CBCT
impact on therapeutic management
incidental findings
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Apr 2022
20 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
07
02
2022
revised:
08
04
2022
accepted:
16
04
2022
entrez:
28
5
2022
pubmed:
29
5
2022
medline:
29
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is increasingly used for dental and maxillofacial imaging. The occurrence of incidental findings has been reported, but clinical implications of these findings remain unclear. The study’s aim was to identify the frequency and clinical impact of incidental findings in CBCT. A total of 374 consecutive CBCT examinations of a 3 year period were retrospectively evaluated for the presence, kind, and clinical relevance of incidental findings. In a subgroup of 54 patients, therapeutic consequences of CBCT incidental findings were queried from the referring physicians. A total of 974 incidental findings were detected, involving 78.6% of all CBCT, hence 2.6 incidental findings per CBCT. Of these, 38.6% were classified to require treatment, with an additional 25.2% requiring follow-up. Incidental findings included dental pathologies in 55.3%, pathologies of the paranasal sinuses and airways in 29.2%, osseous pathologies in 14.9% of all CBCT, and findings in the soft tissue or TMJ in few cases. Clinically relevant dental incidental findings were detected significantly more frequently in CBCT for implant planning compared to other indications (60.7% vs. 43.2%, p < 0.01), and in CBCT with an FOV ≥ 100 mm compared to an FOV < 100 mm (54.7% vs. 40.0%, p < 0.01). Similar results were obtained for paranasal incidental findings. In a subgroup analysis, 29 of 54 patients showed incidental findings which were previously unknown, and the findings changed therapeutical management in 19 patients (35%). The results of our study highlighted the importance of a meticulous analysis of the entire FOV of CBCT for incidental findings, which showed clinical relevance in more than one in three patients. Due to a high number of clinically relevant incidental findings especially in CBCT for implant planning, an FOV of 100 × 100 mm covering both the mandible and the maxilla was concluded to be recommendable for this indication.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35626192
pii: diagnostics12051036
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051036
pmc: PMC9139763
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Orthod. 2013 Mar;40(1):29-37
pubmed: 23524545
Prog Orthod. 2014 Jun 11;15(1):37
pubmed: 25033888
Int J Dent. 2012;2012:871532
pubmed: 23304148
Int J Comput Dent. 2007 Apr;10(2):155-68
pubmed: 17899891
Gen Dent. 2021 Nov-Dec;69(6):42-45
pubmed: 34678741
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Nov;23(11):1261-8
pubmed: 22092929
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2013;123(7-8):661-8
pubmed: 23966013
J Endod. 2017 Jun;43(6):901-904
pubmed: 28359665
Aust Dent J. 2020 Dec;65(4):252-258
pubmed: 32383221
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Jan;46(1):20160215
pubmed: 27604390
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012 Mar-Apr;18(2):159-63
pubmed: 21960135
J Dent Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):474-481
pubmed: 33384837
Oral Radiol. 2021 Oct;37(4):547-559
pubmed: 33420943
Int J Otolaryngol. 2014;2014:465173
pubmed: 24817890
Quintessence Int. 2018;49(5):419-426
pubmed: 29629440
J Dent. 2017 Dec;67:102-106
pubmed: 29031996
Northwest Dent. 2011 Mar-Apr;90(2):12-6
pubmed: 21667587
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Jun;113(6):817-26
pubmed: 22668710
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jul;132(1):7-14
pubmed: 17628245
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(1):20130291
pubmed: 24132023
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):595-603
pubmed: 22616053
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Mar;23(3):329-336
pubmed: 32134031
J Prosthodont. 2021 Oct;30(8):665-675
pubmed: 33433043
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Aug;30(7):1285-92
pubmed: 19461061
Eur Radiol. 1998;8(9):1558-64
pubmed: 9866761
Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Sep;44(3):213-20
pubmed: 25279342
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019 Oct;48(7):20180396
pubmed: 31216179
BMC Oral Health. 2012 Aug 10;12:30
pubmed: 22883529
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140225
pubmed: 25270063
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Feb;9(2):ZC21-4
pubmed: 25859519