A Practical Approach to Assessing Physical Freshness: Utility of a Simple Perceived Physical Freshness Status Scale.
readiness
soccer
training load
well-being
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 05 2022
11 05 2022
Historique:
received:
08
04
2022
revised:
08
05
2022
accepted:
09
05
2022
entrez:
28
5
2022
pubmed:
29
5
2022
medline:
1
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background: Monitoring physical freshness is essential in assessing athletes’ conditions during training periods, training sessions, or competitions. To date, no single physical freshness scale has been successfully validated against training load variables and widely used scales measuring different facets of physical freshness. Objective: In this study, we develop and test the practical utility of a perceived physical freshness (RPF) scale to monitor the condition of the athletes and to prevent excessive fatigue and insufficient recovery during training sessions or competitions. Methods: Sixteen professional male soccer players (mean ± SD age 26 ± 4 years) were enrolled. Training load (TL), monotony, strain, rate of perceived exertion (RPE), well-being indices (sleep, stress, fatigue, and muscle soreness), total quality recovery (TQR) and RPF were determined each day for two weeks of training, including a week intensified training (IW) and a week taper (TW). The validity of the RPF scale was assessed by measuring the level of agreement of a player’s perceived physical freshness relative to their TL variables, recovery state and well-being indices during each training phase (IW and TW) and during the overall training period (TP). Results: RPF increased during the TW compared to IW (ES = 2.31, p < 0.001, large). For the TP, IW and TW, weekly RPF was related to weekly TL (r = −0.81, r = −0.80, r = −0.69, respectively), well-being (r = −0.91, r = −0.82, r = −0.84, respectively) and TQR (r = 0.76, r = 0.91, r = 0.52, respectively), all p < 0.01. For the TP, IW and TW, daily RPF was related to TL (r = −0.75, r = −0.66, r = −0.70, respectively), well-being (r = −0.84, r = −0.81, r = −0.78, respectively) and TQR (r = 0.82, r = 0.81, r = 0.75, respectively), all p < 0.01. Conclusions: RPF was effective for evaluating the professional soccer players’ physical freshness and may be a strategy for coaches to monitor the physical, psycho-physiological, and psychometric state of the players before training session or matches.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35627372
pii: ijerph19105836
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105836
pmc: PMC9141079
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 28;13(12):
pubmed: 34959851
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 11;17(20):
pubmed: 33050671
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Jun;36(6):1042-7
pubmed: 15179175
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Mar;24(3):597-603
pubmed: 20145570
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jan;41(1):3-13
pubmed: 19092709
Physiol Behav. 2020 Oct 15;225:113117
pubmed: 32750432
Physiol Behav. 2019 Mar 15;201:123-129
pubmed: 30611762
Physiol Behav. 2017 Oct 1;179:262-267
pubmed: 28668619
Int J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;40(13):813-817
pubmed: 31614381
Br J Nutr. 1974 Jul;32(1):77-97
pubmed: 4843734
Res Sports Med. 2018 Oct-Dec;26(4):401-412
pubmed: 29966440
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Jul;30(7):1164-8
pubmed: 9662690
J Sci Med Sport. 2013 Nov;16(6):550-5
pubmed: 23332540
Res Sports Med. 2016 Oct-Dec;24(4):375-386
pubmed: 27574867
Res Sports Med. 2018 Oct-Dec;26(4):462-473
pubmed: 29969288
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020 Feb 3;15(5):731-740
pubmed: 32015214
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 May 14;9(5):
pubmed: 34069245
Sports Med. 1998 Jul;26(1):1-16
pubmed: 9739537
Front Physiol. 2021 Mar 18;12:638180
pubmed: 33815144
Biol Sport. 2022 Mar;39(2):319-327
pubmed: 35309535
J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Feb;15(1):109-15
pubmed: 11708692
Res Sports Med. 2016 Oct-Dec;24(4):387-394
pubmed: 27712094
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Oct 1;35(10):2802-2809
pubmed: 31403575
Sports Med. 1995 Nov;20(5):321-7
pubmed: 8571005