Left Atrial Thrombus in Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Patients in Relation to Anticoagulation Strategy: LATTEE Registry.
apixaban
dabigatran
rivaroxaban
thromboembolic risk
transesophageal echocardiography
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 May 2022
11 May 2022
Historique:
received:
22
03
2022
revised:
20
04
2022
accepted:
27
04
2022
entrez:
28
5
2022
pubmed:
29
5
2022
medline:
29
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFl) increase the risk of thromboembolism. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of left atrial thrombus (LAT) in AF/AFl in relation to oral anticoagulation (OAC). Methods: LATTEE (NCT03591627) was a multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolling consecutive patients with AF/AFl referred for transesophageal echocardiography before cardioversion or ablation. Results: Of 3109 patients enrolled, 88% were on chronic, 1.5% on transient OAC and 10% without OAC. Of patients on chronic OAC, 39% received rivaroxaban, 30% dabigatran, 14% apixaban and 18% vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Patients on apixaban were oldest, had the worst renal function and were highest in both bleeding and thromboembolic risk, and more often received reduced doses. Prevalence of LAT was 8.0% (7.3% on chronic OAC vs. 15% without OAC; p < 0.01). In patients on VKA, prevalence of LAT was doubled compared to patients on non-VKA-OACs (NOACs) (13% vs. 6.0%; p < 0.01), even after propensity score weighting (13% vs. 7.5%; p < 0.01). Prevalence of LAT in patients on apixaban was higher (9.8%) than in those on rivaroxaban (5.7%) and dabigatran (4.7%; p < 0.01 for both comparisons), however, not after propensity score weighting. Conclusions: The prevalence of LAT in AF is non-negligible even on chronic OAC. The risk of LAT seems higher on VKA compared to NOAC, and similar between different NOACs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35628832
pii: jcm11102705
doi: 10.3390/jcm11102705
pmc: PMC9143266
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 28;11(10):e0164076
pubmed: 27792741
Cardiol J. 2021;28(1):101-109
pubmed: 31225630
Pol Arch Intern Med. 2017 Dec 22;127(12):823-831
pubmed: 28972957
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15;249:234-246
pubmed: 28882323
Europace. 2016 Nov;18(11):1609-1678
pubmed: 27567465
Circulation. 2017 Apr 18;135(16):1475-1477
pubmed: 28416519
Heart. 2019 Sep;105(17):1310-1315
pubmed: 31040170
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 21;60(8):738-46
pubmed: 22575324
Lancet. 2014 Mar 15;383(9921):955-62
pubmed: 24315724
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Aug;32(8):2179-2188
pubmed: 33969568
Chest. 2016 Dec;150(6):1302-1312
pubmed: 27938741
Kardiol Pol. 2019 Nov 22;77(11):1078-1080
pubmed: 31584037
Europace. 2021 Oct 9;23(10):1612-1676
pubmed: 33895845
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021 Apr 9;7(FI1):f20-f29
pubmed: 31830264
Cardiol J. 2022;29(2):205-215
pubmed: 32207840
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498
pubmed: 32860505
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Mar 15;23(4):961-9
pubmed: 8106703
Am Heart J. 2003 Apr;145(4):676-82
pubmed: 12679765
JAMA. 2014 Nov 19;312(19):1988-98
pubmed: 25399274