State of Prestressing Analysis of 62-Year-Old Bridge.

Barkhausen noise technique assessment bridge non-destructive testing prestressing force saw-cut method structural response method

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 May 2022
Historique:
received: 26 04 2022
revised: 13 05 2022
accepted: 16 05 2022
entrez: 28 5 2022
pubmed: 29 5 2022
medline: 29 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Ageing infrastructure leads to the need for a proper assessment and final decisions considering its state. In the case of prestressed concrete structures, knowledge of the residual state of prestressing is the crucial factor. Therefore, reliable diagnostic techniques for determining the residual value of the prestressing force are needed. This information is subsequently used in the process of the quantification of the load-carrying capacity and remaining service life of prestressed concrete structures. The presented paper introduces an evaluation of a monolithic 62-year-old prestressed concrete bridge, which was built in 1959. The assessment was carried out as a result of concerns after exposure of the anchorage area of the bridge, which was executed during the construction of the new system of anti-flood barriers in the town of Banska Bystrica in central Slovakia. Therefore, the diagnostic survey and subsequent determination of the residual prestressing force included the application of the saw-cut method, the structural response method, and the Barkhausen noise technique. Finally, the experimental program supported by numerical analysis provided information about the actual state of prestressing in the bridge. Results of performed analysis suggested that the state of prestressing of the bridge in question does not significantly differ from the expected level of prestressing after 62 years of service. Subsequently, obtained conclusions enabled the determination of the load-carrying capacity for future use in the form of a pedestrian bridge.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35629609
pii: ma15103583
doi: 10.3390/ma15103583
pmc: PMC9146291
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Scientific Grant Agency (VEGA)
ID : 1/0306/21
Organisme : Scientific Grant Agency (VEGA)
ID : 1/0048/22
Organisme : Cultural and Educational Grant Agency (KEGA)
ID : 020ŽU-4/2021

Références

Materials (Basel). 2019 Oct 22;12(20):
pubmed: 31652504
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 28;13(23):
pubmed: 33260664
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 10;14(6):
pubmed: 33802108
Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 15;14(24):
pubmed: 34947359

Auteurs

Jakub Kralovanec (J)

Department of Structures and Bridges, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia.

Frantisek Bahleda (F)

Laboratory of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia.

Martin Moravcik (M)

Department of Structures and Bridges, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 010 26 Zilina, Slovakia.

Classifications MeSH