The Suitability of Latex Particles to Evaluate Critical Process Parameters in Steric Exclusion Chromatography.
SXC
aggregation
crowding out
downstream processing
pH
polyethylene glycol
precipitation
Journal
Membranes
ISSN: 2077-0375
Titre abrégé: Membranes (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101577807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Apr 2022
30 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
05
04
2022
revised:
27
04
2022
accepted:
28
04
2022
entrez:
28
5
2022
pubmed:
29
5
2022
medline:
29
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The steric exclusion chromatography (SXC) is a rather new method for the purification of large biomolecules and biological nanoparticles based on the principles of precipitation. The mutual steric exclusion of a nonionic organic polymer, i.e., polyethylene glycol (PEG), induces target precipitation and leads to their retention on the chromatographic stationary phase. In this work, we investigated the application of latex particles in the SXC by altering the particle's surface charge as well as the PEG concentration and correlated both with their aggregation behavior. The parameters of interest were offline precipitation kinetics, the product recovery and yield, and the chromatographic column blockage. Sulfated and hydroxylated polystyrene particles were first characterized concerning their aggregation behavior and charge in the presence of PEG and different pH conditions. Subsequently, the SXC performance was evaluated based on the preliminary tests. The studies showed (1) that the SXC process with latex particles was limited by aggregation and pore blockage, while (2) not the aggregate size itself, but rather the aggregation kinetics dominated the recoveries, and (3) functionalized polystyrene particles were only suitable to a limited extent to represent biological nanoparticles of comparable size and charge.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35629814
pii: membranes12050488
doi: 10.3390/membranes12050488
pmc: PMC9144368
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 1;10(1):16261
pubmed: 33004836
Hum Gene Ther. 2021 Sep;32(17-18):959-974
pubmed: 33554722
J Biotechnol. 2020 Nov 10;323:62-72
pubmed: 32763261
J Biotechnol. 2020 Nov 10;323:221-230
pubmed: 32860824
Biophys J. 2008 Apr 15;94(8):3293-312
pubmed: 18192368
J Chromatogr A. 2018 Nov 02;1574:50-59
pubmed: 30195858
J Colloid Interface Sci. 2015 May 15;446:327-34
pubmed: 25265875
J Chromatogr A. 2012 Dec 28;1270:162-70
pubmed: 23182281
J Chromatogr A. 2014 Mar 14;1333:54-9
pubmed: 24552971
J Chromatogr A. 2010 Sep 24;1217(39):6077-84
pubmed: 20739026
J Virol Methods. 2020 Jan;275:113756
pubmed: 31644888
J Biol Chem. 1981 Jan 25;256(2):625-31
pubmed: 7192709
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011 Jan 21;13(3):1037-53
pubmed: 21072398
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2019 Apr;42(4):513-520
pubmed: 30535587
Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Dec 12;15(12):23090-140
pubmed: 25514413
J Pharm Sci. 2018 Sep;107(9):2297-2305
pubmed: 29859960
Methods Enzymol. 1998;295:127-49
pubmed: 9750217
J Virol Methods. 2018 Jun;256:123-132
pubmed: 29438732
Biochemistry. 1982 Dec 7;21(25):6545-52
pubmed: 7150575
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2019 Oct 1;182:110398
pubmed: 31376688
Biochemistry. 1985 Nov 19;24(24):6756-62
pubmed: 4074726
J Phys Chem B. 2021 Nov 11;125(44):12384-12391
pubmed: 34705447
Materials (Basel). 2017 May 22;10(5):
pubmed: 28772926
J Chromatogr A. 2014 Jan 10;1324:171-80
pubmed: 24315125
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 19;11(1):16861
pubmed: 34413323
J Chromatogr A. 2017 Feb 3;1483:110-119
pubmed: 28069171
Acta Biomater. 2012 Mar;8(3):1221-9
pubmed: 21963406