A systematic review on machine learning models for online learning and examination systems.
Authentication
Fraud detection
Machine learning
Online examinations
Online learning
Security
Journal
PeerJ. Computer science
ISSN: 2376-5992
Titre abrégé: PeerJ Comput Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101660598
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
08
04
2022
accepted:
28
04
2022
entrez:
31
5
2022
pubmed:
1
6
2022
medline:
1
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Examinations or assessments play a vital role in every student's life; they determine their future and career paths. The COVID pandemic has left adverse impacts in all areas, including the academic field. The regularized classroom learning and face-to-face real-time examinations were not feasible to avoid widespread infection and ensure safety. During these desperate times, technological advancements stepped in to aid students in continuing their education without any academic breaks. Machine learning is a key to this digital transformation of schools or colleges from real-time to online mode. Online learning and examination during lockdown were made possible by Machine learning methods. In this article, a systematic review of the role of Machine learning in Lockdown Exam Management Systems was conducted by evaluating 135 studies over the last five years. The significance of Machine learning in the entire exam cycle from pre-exam preparation, conduction of examination, and evaluation were studied and discussed. The unsupervised or supervised Machine learning algorithms were identified and categorized in each process. The primary aspects of examinations, such as authentication, scheduling, proctoring, and cheat or fraud detection, are investigated in detail with Machine learning perspectives. The main attributes, such as prediction of at-risk students, adaptive learning, and monitoring of students, are integrated for more understanding of the role of machine learning in exam preparation, followed by its management of the post-examination process. Finally, this review concludes with issues and challenges that machine learning imposes on the examination system, and these issues are discussed with solutions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35634115
doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.986
pii: cs-986
pmc: PMC9137850
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e986Informations de copyright
©2022 Kaddoura et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Jude D. Hemanth is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.
Références
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 2;16(4):e0249423
pubmed: 33798204
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):453
pubmed: 35013396
Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2021;18(1):63
pubmed: 34873580
Procedia Comput Sci. 2021;184:835-840
pubmed: 34025824
JMIR Med Educ. 2021 Feb 4;7(1):e24032
pubmed: 33444154
SN Comput Sci. 2021;2(3):160
pubmed: 33778771
J Med Syst. 2019 Jun 27;43(8):249
pubmed: 31250207
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Dec 25;23(1):
pubmed: 33375658
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 4;16(8):e0254340
pubmed: 34347794