Turkish Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale.
Journal
Turkish journal of urology
ISSN: 2149-3235
Titre abrégé: Turk J Urol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101643563
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
entrez:
31
5
2022
pubmed:
1
6
2022
medline:
1
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
As the number of mobile health applications increases, quality assessment becomes a capital feature of any mobile application design. Besides the professional evaluation conducted before marketing the app, the perceptions of the subjects to whom is intended will determine the successful widespread dis- semination. Hence, the implementation of a given app may be impaired by the lack of a validated transla- tion and cross-cultural adaptation. We aimed to validate in the Turkish language the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale, an English original scale designed to assess the quality of mobile health applications. A well-established and predefined process of cross-cultural adaptation and transla- tion to Turkish of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale according to the World Health Organization guidelines was performed using a common, readily available, free-of-charge application. Internal consistency and reliability were tested in a population sample by Cronbach's α and rWG index, respectively. The total User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale score had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.87). Internal consistencies of its subscales were also acceptable: with Cronbach's α of 0.71, 0.78, 0.71, and 0.73 for engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information, respectively. Cronbach's α of the satisfaction subscale was 0.46. The User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale total and sub- scales scores had a strong within-group agreement, all of them with rwg indexes between 0.78 and 0.87 over baseline to 1 month. The Turkish version of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale is consistent with the English original version and is a reliable and valid tool to assess the quality of mobile applications by Turkish users.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35634943
doi: 10.5152/tud.2022.21324
pmc: PMC9730268
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
236-242Références
BMC Med. 2018 Dec 3;16(1):225
pubmed: 30501638
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 13;7(8):e15021
pubmed: 31411147
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 07;16:83
pubmed: 27387434
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2021;17(2):161-168
pubmed: 32619173
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0246061
pubmed: 33539433
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 1;7(5):e13019
pubmed: 31066712
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):e022969
pubmed: 30121614
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 23;7(1):e9836
pubmed: 30672742
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Feb 26;3(1):e20
pubmed: 25803705
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 10;4(2):e72
pubmed: 27287964
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Apr;81:62-69
pubmed: 29494935
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 11;3(1):e27
pubmed: 25760773
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 27;8(3):e14479
pubmed: 32217504
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 7;9(4):e23649
pubmed: 33825693
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):330-340
pubmed: 31599936
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Aug 1;25(8):1089-1098
pubmed: 29788283
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 3;8(3):e16956
pubmed: 32130183
Heart Lung Circ. 2016 Aug;25(8):802-7
pubmed: 27262389
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 14;4(2):e74
pubmed: 27302310
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Sep;129:95-99
pubmed: 31445295
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Jan;24(1):22-30
pubmed: 27760883
World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):565-573
pubmed: 29222595