Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS): Cross-Cultural Validation and Psychometric Testing of the Portuguese Version in Puerperal Context.


Journal

Florence Nightingale journal of nursing
ISSN: 2687-6442
Titre abrégé: Florence Nightingale J Nurs
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101770108

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
entrez: 31 5 2022
pubmed: 1 6 2022
medline: 1 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aimed to adapt and validate the Nurse Caring Patient Scale (NCPS) in a puerperal context to the European Portuguese. This research was a methodological study. The participant sample comprised 100 puerperal women, with an average age of 31.3 years (SD = 5.65), who attended a public hospital in southern Portugal. The instrument, originally consisting of 22 items, underwent translation, back translation, and semantic and colloquial conciliation. Ethical aspects have been respected. Factor analysis with varimax rotation revealed a set of 17 items with factor weights greater than .400. Three factors emerged, which explain 65.537% of the variance, namely "Being-at-the-Moment" (8 items), "Responsibility-for-the-Other" (5 items) and "Care-Diligent" (4 items). Reliability through Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the total scale was .881, and in the subscales, ranged from .713 to .938. Precision was analyzed using the split-half method, reaching an alpha with Spearman-Brown correction of .900. The convergent validity between the instrument versus the discrete variable Care-Offered showed, in the total scale, a Spearman rho of .851 and in the subscales between .528 and .616. In the discriminating validity, the Mann-Whitney test revealed that Portuguese women, vis-à-vis foreign women significantly value the dimensions "Being-at-the Moment" and "Responsibility-for-the-Other" (p < .05), while in the "Care-Diligent" component, there are no significant differences (p > .05). The European Portuguese version of the NCPS, in an obstetric context, has reliability and validity. A further study in a random sample and validation in other Lusophone countries will be appropriate.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35635346
doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2022.21007
pmc: PMC8958236
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

40-47

Références

J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jun;29(11-12):1797-1807
pubmed: 32246731
Med Care. 2018 Feb;56(2):107-110
pubmed: 29256974
Matern Child Health J. 2013 May;17(4):616-23
pubmed: 22581378
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Jul;76(7):1638-1646
pubmed: 32147877
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Dec 09;12:176
pubmed: 25492701
J Child Health Care. 2021 Dec;25(4):523-533
pubmed: 33021840
Qual Life Res. 2013 Oct;22(8):1889-905
pubmed: 23288613
Midwifery. 2016 Feb;33:55-63
pubmed: 26527326
Evol Med Public Health. 2014 Nov 11;2014(1):148
pubmed: 25389104
Nurs Open. 2020 Jan 10;7(2):660-668
pubmed: 32089865
Nurs Forum. 2009 Jan-Mar;44(1):2-10
pubmed: 19187048
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 30;13:156
pubmed: 23631468
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jan;25(1-2):278-81
pubmed: 26531215
Br J Nurs. 2020 Feb 13;29(3):176-177
pubmed: 32053442
J R Soc Med. 2010 May;103(5):188-98
pubmed: 20436027

Auteurs

Ana Galhanas (A)

Department of Obstetric, Hospital do Espírito Santo, Evora, Portugal.

Ana Frias (A)

Department of Nursing, University of Evora, Comprehensive Health Research Center, Evora, Portugal.

Margarida Sim-Sim (M)

Department of Nursing, University of Evora, Comprehensive Health Research Center, Evora, Portugal.

Classifications MeSH