A non-invasive direct nose to brain drug delivery platform vs. invasive brain delivery approach: patient-centered care impact analysis.
Journal
Drug delivery
ISSN: 1521-0464
Titre abrégé: Drug Deliv
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9417471
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
entrez:
31
5
2022
pubmed:
1
6
2022
medline:
3
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Current literature lacks structured methodologies for analyzing medical technologies' impact from the patient-centered care perspective. This study introduces, applies and validates 'Patient-Centered Care Impact Analysis' (PCIA) as a method for identifying patient-centered care associated demands and expectations for a particular technology and assessing its compliance with these demands. PCIA involves five stages: (1) demand identification, (2) ranking demands' impact magnitude, (3) scoring demand compliance (DC), (4) demand priority (DP) assignment based on impact magnitude and compliance, (5) generating a summative impact priority number (IPN). PCIA was performed as a comparative assessment of two central nervous system (CNS) drug-delivery platforms; SipNose, a novel noninvasive Direct-Nose-to-Brain (DNTB), vs. the standard-of-care invasive intrathecal/intracerebroventricular injection (Invasive I/I). Study participants included a ranking team (RT) without experience with the SipNose technology that based their scoring on experimental data; and a validation team (VT) experienced with the SipNose platform. All had experience with, or knowledge of, InvasiveI/I. Demand identification and impact magnitude were performed by one content and one assessment expert. Each participant assessed each technology's DC. DP scores, IPN's and IPN DNTB:InvasiveI/I ratios were generated for each technology, for each team, based on DC and summative DP scores, respectively. Both teams assigned DNTB higher DC scores, resulting in higher DNTB DP, IPN scores and DNTB:InvasiveI/I IPN ratios. Lack of difference between team assessments of DP and IPN ratio validate PCIA as an assessment tool capable of predicting patient-centered clinical care quality for a new technology. The significant differences between the platforms highlight SipNose's patient-care centered advantages as an effective CNS drug-delivery platform.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35635357
doi: 10.1080/10717544.2022.2080889
pmc: PMC9176683
doi:
Substances chimiques
Central Nervous System Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1754-1763Références
J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 May-Jun;24(3):229-39
pubmed: 21551394
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Mar;3(2):188-95
pubmed: 20179265
J Pharm Sci. 2010 Apr;99(4):1654-73
pubmed: 19877171
J Med Syst. 2012 Jun;36(3):1543-51
pubmed: 21069440
BJA Educ. 2020 Feb;20(2):51-57
pubmed: 33456930
Adv Surg. 2015;49:221-33
pubmed: 26299501
Pharm Res. 2013 Oct;30(10):2475-84
pubmed: 23135822
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Jan 27;14(2):
pubmed: 33513737
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2293-2297
pubmed: 27959688
J Healthc Qual. 2015 Jan-Feb;37(1):81-92
pubmed: 26042380
J Alzheimers Dis. 1998 Mar;1(1):35-44
pubmed: 12214010
J Psychopharmacol. 2006 Nov;20(6 Suppl):38-56
pubmed: 17046986
BMC Nurs. 2012 Jun 14;11:8
pubmed: 22697398
Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2012 Jan 01;4(1):74-89
pubmed: 22202044
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1
pubmed: 22375967
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 17;368(3):201-3
pubmed: 23268647
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 May;28(5):248-67, 209
pubmed: 12053459
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Jan;17(1):41-8
pubmed: 21348567