A High-Throughput Comet Assay Approach for Assessing Cellular DNA Damage.


Journal

Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE
ISSN: 1940-087X
Titre abrégé: J Vis Exp
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101313252

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 05 2022
Historique:
entrez: 31 5 2022
pubmed: 1 6 2022
medline: 3 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cells are continually exposed to agents arising from the internal and external environments, which may damage DNA. This damage can cause aberrant cell function, and therefore DNA damage may play a critical role in the development of, conceivably, all major human diseases, e.g., cancer, neurodegenerative and cardiovascular disease, and aging. Single-cell gel electrophoresis (i.e., the comet assay) is one of the most common and sensitive methods to study the formation and repair of a wide range of types of DNA damage (e.g., single- and double-strand breaks, alkali-labile sites, DNA-DNA crosslinks, and, in combination with certain repair enzymes, oxidized purines, and pyrimidines), in both in vitro and in vivo systems. However, the low sample throughput of the conventional assay and laborious sample workup are limiting factors to its widest possible application. With the "scoring" of comets increasingly automated, the limitation is now the ability to process significant numbers of comet slides. Here, a high-throughput (HTP) variant of the comet assay (HTP comet assay) has been developed, which significantly increases the number of samples analyzed, decreases assay run time, the number of individual slide manipulations, reagent requirements, and risk of physical damage to the gels. Furthermore, the footprint of the electrophoresis tank is significantly decreased due to the vertical orientation of the slides and integral cooling. Also reported here is a novel approach to chilling comet assay slides, which conveniently and efficiently facilitates the solidification of the comet gels. Here, the application of these devices to representative comet assay methods has been described. These simple innovations greatly support the use of the comet assay and its application to areas of study such as exposure biology, ecotoxicology, biomonitoring, toxicity screening/testing, together with understanding pathogenesis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35635461
doi: 10.3791/63559
pmc: PMC9486971
mid: NIHMS1832054
doi:

Substances chimiques

DNA 9007-49-2

Types de publication

Journal Article Video-Audio Media Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : R41 ES030274
Pays : United States

Références

Electrophoresis. 1999 Jul;20(10):2133-8
pubmed: 10451126
Sci Rep. 2014 Nov 26;4:7200
pubmed: 25425241
Biochem Soc Trans. 2018 Oct 19;46(5):1213-1224
pubmed: 30287511
DNA Repair (Amst). 2006 Feb 3;5(2):219-25
pubmed: 16253571
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;817:165-81
pubmed: 22147573
Methods Mol Biol. 2010;613:267-82
pubmed: 19997890
Free Radic Biol Med. 2011 Aug 1;51(3):719-25
pubmed: 21658444
J Vis Exp. 2014 Oct 18;(92):e50607
pubmed: 25350601
Free Radic Biol Med. 2009 Jan 1;46(1):78-87
pubmed: 18973801
Mutat Res. 2003 Jul 8;538(1-2):71-80
pubmed: 12834756
Int J Cancer. 2014 Mar 1;134(5):1102-11
pubmed: 23959905
Mutat Res. 1997 Sep 18;393(1-2):107-13
pubmed: 9357567
Bioessays. 2004 May;26(5):533-42
pubmed: 15112233
Environ Mol Mutagen. 1999;33(2):167-72
pubmed: 10217071
Cell Biol Toxicol. 2009 Feb;25(1):53-64
pubmed: 18040874
Cell Biochem Funct. 2014 Apr;32(3):299-302
pubmed: 24277467
Mutat Res. 2008 Jan 31;650(1):55-62
pubmed: 18032094
Mutat Res. 2004 Sep;567(1):1-61
pubmed: 15341901
Exp Cell Res. 1988 Mar;175(1):184-91
pubmed: 3345800
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Dec 02;20(23):
pubmed: 31810189
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984 Aug 30;123(1):291-8
pubmed: 6477583
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2019 Sep;845:403054
pubmed: 31561888
Radiat Res. 1990 Apr;122(1):86-94
pubmed: 2320728
Nat Protoc. 2020 Dec;15(12):3817-3826
pubmed: 33106678
Br J Cancer. 2003 Dec 15;89(12):2271-6
pubmed: 14676805
FASEB J. 2003 Jul;17(10):1195-214
pubmed: 12832285

Auteurs

Yunhee Ji (Y)

Oxidative Stress Group, Dept. Cell Biology, Microbiology and Molecular Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Florida.

Mahsa Karbaschi (M)

Cepheid (Danaher Corp.), US Technical Operations.

Abdulhadi Abdulwahed (A)

Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University.

Natalia S Quinete (NS)

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Institute of Environment, Florida International University.

Mark D Evans (MD)

Leicester School of Allied Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University.

Marcus S Cooke (MS)

Oxidative Stress Group, Dept. Cell Biology, Microbiology and Molecular Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Florida; cookem@usf.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH