Case series of traumatic neglected Extensor Hallucis Longus lacerations: choice of surgical treatment based on injury type.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 12 2021
29 12 2021
Historique:
received:
16
12
2020
accepted:
20
03
2021
entrez:
31
5
2022
pubmed:
1
6
2022
medline:
3
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Extensor Hallucis Longus (EHL) tendon rupture is a rare injury of the foot, representing only 1% of overall tendon rupture. Early diagnosis and surgical repair are recommended but there is still no consensus regarding the ideal treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a case series of patients with neglected extensor hallucis longus (EHL) tendon rupture. We report a case series of 3 patients affected by traumatic neglected EHL lacerations treated with reconstructive surgery using tissue scaffolds, between November 2019 and May 2020. Demographics data, mechanism of injury, zone of injury, tendon gap, time to surgery, type of surgical repair, preoperative and postoperative functional score were collected with a minimum follow-up of 8 months. The zone of injury (according to Al-Qattan classification) involved was in 1 case zone 2, in 1 case zone 4 and in the last case zone 5. The mean value of intraoperative tendon gap was of 3,4 cm. The elapsed time from injury to surgery was an average of 3,3 months. One tendon transfer surgery and two primary repairs with Krakow fashion were performed, all augmented with tissue scaffolds. The mean preoperative and postoperative American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were, respectively, 43 and 97. Our results highlight good functional result and satisfaction with active extension of the hallux restored in all patients. According to our experience, we recommend choosing reconstruction technique basing on the topographic zone of lesion and intraoperative tendon gap.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Extensor Hallucis Longus (EHL) tendon rupture is a rare injury of the foot, representing only 1% of overall tendon rupture. Early diagnosis and surgical repair are recommended but there is still no consensus regarding the ideal treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a case series of patients with neglected extensor hallucis longus (EHL) tendon rupture.
METHODS
We report a case series of 3 patients affected by traumatic neglected EHL lacerations treated with reconstructive surgery using tissue scaffolds, between November 2019 and May 2020. Demographics data, mechanism of injury, zone of injury, tendon gap, time to surgery, type of surgical repair, preoperative and postoperative functional score were collected with a minimum follow-up of 8 months.
RESULTS
The zone of injury (according to Al-Qattan classification) involved was in 1 case zone 2, in 1 case zone 4 and in the last case zone 5. The mean value of intraoperative tendon gap was of 3,4 cm. The elapsed time from injury to surgery was an average of 3,3 months. One tendon transfer surgery and two primary repairs with Krakow fashion were performed, all augmented with tissue scaffolds. The mean preoperative and postoperative American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were, respectively, 43 and 97.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results highlight good functional result and satisfaction with active extension of the hallux restored in all patients. According to our experience, we recommend choosing reconstruction technique basing on the topographic zone of lesion and intraoperative tendon gap.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35635759
doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS1.11131
pmc: PMC10523034
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2021349Références
Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Jun;25(3):272-277
pubmed: 29409181
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Aug;88(8):988-92
pubmed: 16877593
Arch Plast Surg. 2013 Jul;40(4):403-8
pubmed: 23898439
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(4):360-7
pubmed: 17349589
Orthopedics. 2008 Oct;31(10):
pubmed: 19225994
Acta Biomed. 2019 Dec 05;90(12-S):202-206
pubmed: 31821310
Foot Ankle Clin. 2000 Sep;5(3):725-36, x
pubmed: 11232406
Dermatology. 2009;219(3):272-3
pubmed: 19648727
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965 Nov;47(4):686-9
pubmed: 5846768
Foot Ankle Int. 2002 Dec;23(12):1124-5
pubmed: 12503804
Foot Ankle. 1983 Jul-Aug;4(1):8-14
pubmed: 6137443
Wound Repair Regen. 2013 Jan-Feb;21(1):141-54
pubmed: 23228143
Foot Ankle Int. 1995 Jan;16(1):41-3
pubmed: 7697153
J Foot Surg. 1990 Mar-Apr;29(2):179-82
pubmed: 1970988
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012 Jul-Aug;51(4):509-16
pubmed: 22658790
Foot Ankle Spec. 2014 Feb;7(1):45-51
pubmed: 24334369
Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Oct;33(10):905-11
pubmed: 23050717
Foot Ankle Int. 2003 Jun;24(6):506-8
pubmed: 12854673
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002 Sep;92(8):467-70
pubmed: 12237269
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Nov - Dec;57(6):1218-1220
pubmed: 30146339
Arch Plast Surg. 2014 Jul;41(4):330-6
pubmed: 25075353