Longitudinal variation in SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels and emergence of viral variants: a serological analysis.
Journal
The Lancet. Microbe
ISSN: 2666-5247
Titre abrégé: Lancet Microbe
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101769019
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
08
07
2021
revised:
14
03
2022
accepted:
28
03
2022
pubmed:
1
6
2022
medline:
8
7
2022
entrez:
31
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Serological assays are being used to monitor antibody responses in individuals who had SARS-CoV-2 infection and those who received a COVID-19 vaccine. We aimed to determine whether such assays can predict neutralising antibody titres as antibody levels wane and viral variants emerge. We measured antibody levels in serum samples from a cohort of 112 participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection using ten high-throughput serological tests and functional neutralisation assays. Serum samples were taken at baseline and at up to four subsequent visits. We assessed the effects of time and spike protein sequence variation on the performance and predictive value of the various assays. We did correlation analyses for individual timepoints using non-parametric Spearman correlation, and differences between timepoints were determined by use of a two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Neutralising antibody titres decreased over the first few months post-infection but stabilised thereafter, at about 30% of the level observed shortly after infection. Serological assays commonly used to measure antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 displayed a range of sensitivities that declined to varying extents over time. Quantitative measurements generated by serological assays based on the spike protein were better at predicting neutralising antibody titres than those based on nucleocapsid, but performance was variable, and manufacturer positivity thresholds were not able to predict the presence or absence of detectable neutralising activity. Although we observed some deterioration in correlation between serological measurements and functional neutralisation activity, some assays maintained an ability to predict neutralising titres, even against variants of concern. The ability of high-throughput serological assays to predict neutralising antibody titres is likely to be crucial for evaluation of immunity at the population scale. These data can facilitate the selection of the most suitable assays as surrogates of functional neutralising activity and suggest that such measurements might be useful in clinical practice. US National Institutes of Health and National Health Service Research Scotland BioResource.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Serological assays are being used to monitor antibody responses in individuals who had SARS-CoV-2 infection and those who received a COVID-19 vaccine. We aimed to determine whether such assays can predict neutralising antibody titres as antibody levels wane and viral variants emerge.
METHODS
We measured antibody levels in serum samples from a cohort of 112 participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection using ten high-throughput serological tests and functional neutralisation assays. Serum samples were taken at baseline and at up to four subsequent visits. We assessed the effects of time and spike protein sequence variation on the performance and predictive value of the various assays. We did correlation analyses for individual timepoints using non-parametric Spearman correlation, and differences between timepoints were determined by use of a two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.
FINDINGS
Neutralising antibody titres decreased over the first few months post-infection but stabilised thereafter, at about 30% of the level observed shortly after infection. Serological assays commonly used to measure antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 displayed a range of sensitivities that declined to varying extents over time. Quantitative measurements generated by serological assays based on the spike protein were better at predicting neutralising antibody titres than those based on nucleocapsid, but performance was variable, and manufacturer positivity thresholds were not able to predict the presence or absence of detectable neutralising activity. Although we observed some deterioration in correlation between serological measurements and functional neutralisation activity, some assays maintained an ability to predict neutralising titres, even against variants of concern.
INTERPRETATION
The ability of high-throughput serological assays to predict neutralising antibody titres is likely to be crucial for evaluation of immunity at the population scale. These data can facilitate the selection of the most suitable assays as surrogates of functional neutralising activity and suggest that such measurements might be useful in clinical practice.
FUNDING
US National Institutes of Health and National Health Service Research Scotland BioResource.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35636436
pii: S2666-5247(22)00090-8
doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00090-8
pmc: PMC9141682
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Neutralizing
0
Antibodies, Viral
0
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
0
spike protein, SARS-CoV-2
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e493-e502Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateOf
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests SJ and EF received honoraria from Siemens for an online webinar in October, 2020, which was paid to their institutions. EF received sCOVG reagent from Siemens to support this study. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Elife. 2020 Oct 28;9:
pubmed: 33112236
Immunity. 2021 Aug 10;54(8):1853-1868.e7
pubmed: 34331873
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):450-456
pubmed: 32698192
Cell Host Microbe. 2021 May 12;29(5):819-833.e7
pubmed: 33789084
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Jul;146(1):35-43
pubmed: 32479758
Front Med. 2020 Dec;14(6):746-751
pubmed: 33017040
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 13;384(19):1866-1868
pubmed: 33761203
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7855):616-622
pubmed: 33567448
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2021 Jun;28(6):478-486
pubmed: 33981021
Cell Host Microbe. 2021 Jan 13;29(1):44-57.e9
pubmed: 33259788
mBio. 2021 Jun 29;12(3):e0069621
pubmed: 34060334
J Exp Med. 2020 Nov 2;217(11):
pubmed: 32692348
J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 13;223(3):389-398
pubmed: 33140086
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021 Jul;19(7):409-424
pubmed: 34075212
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Sep;41(3):483-499
pubmed: 32651106
Nat Med. 2021 Apr;27(4):622-625
pubmed: 33654292
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 6;11(1):3436
pubmed: 32632160
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Dec;5(12):1598-1607
pubmed: 33106674
mBio. 2020 Oct 16;11(5):
pubmed: 33067385
Science. 2020 Aug 21;369(6506):956-963
pubmed: 32540903
Front Immunol. 2020 Dec 18;11:610688
pubmed: 33391281
Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7851):639-644
pubmed: 33461210
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Nov 18;58(12):
pubmed: 32917729
J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb 3;223(2):197-205
pubmed: 33535236
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7867):426-431
pubmed: 34126625
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 7;384(1):80-82
pubmed: 33270381
Cell. 2021 Apr 29;184(9):2332-2347.e16
pubmed: 33761326
Clin Chem. 2020 Dec 1;66(12):1538-1547
pubmed: 32894750