Emergency department visits within 90 days of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

ACDF Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion Cost Emergency department Readmission Risk factors Spine

Journal

North American Spine Society journal
ISSN: 2666-5484
Titre abrégé: N Am Spine Soc J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918335076906676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 03 05 2022
accepted: 05 05 2022
entrez: 31 5 2022
pubmed: 1 6 2022
medline: 1 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Postoperative readmissions are a commonly used metric for quality-of-care initiatives, but emergency department (ED) visits have received far less attention despite their substantial impact on patient satisfaction and healthcare spending. The current study described the incidence and timing of ED visits following single-level ACDF, determined predictive factors and reasons for ED utilization, and compared reimbursement for patients with and without ED use. Single-level ACDF procedures from 2010-2020 were identified in PearlDiver using CPT codes. Patients' age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI) score, region of the country, and insurance coverage were extracted. The incidence, timing, and primary diagnoses for 90-day ED visits and readmissions were determined, as well as total 90-day reimbursement. Variables were compared using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Out of 90,298 patients, 90-day ED visits were identified for 10,701 (11.9%), with the greatest incidence in postoperative weeks 1-2. Readmissions were identified for 3,325 (3.7%) patients. Independent predictors of ED utilization included younger age (OR 1.25 per 10-year decrease, p<0.001), greater ECI score (OR 1.40 per 2-point increase, p<0.001), and insurance type (relative to Medicare, Medicaid [OR 2.15, p<0.001] and commercial plans [OR 1.14, p=0.004]). In postoperative weeks 1-2, 51% of primary ED diagnoses involved the surgical site, while 23% involved the surgical site in weeks 3-13. Compared to patients without ED visits, those who visited the ED had 65% greater mean 90-day reimbursement (p<0.001). More than three times as many patients in the current study were found to present to the ED than be readmitted within ninety days of surgery. The identified predictive factors and reasons for ED visits can direct attention to high-risk patients and common postoperative issues. Additional postoperative counseling and integrated care pathways may reduce ED visits, thereby improving patient care and reducing healthcare spending.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Postoperative readmissions are a commonly used metric for quality-of-care initiatives, but emergency department (ED) visits have received far less attention despite their substantial impact on patient satisfaction and healthcare spending. The current study described the incidence and timing of ED visits following single-level ACDF, determined predictive factors and reasons for ED utilization, and compared reimbursement for patients with and without ED use.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Single-level ACDF procedures from 2010-2020 were identified in PearlDiver using CPT codes. Patients' age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI) score, region of the country, and insurance coverage were extracted. The incidence, timing, and primary diagnoses for 90-day ED visits and readmissions were determined, as well as total 90-day reimbursement. Variables were compared using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.
Results UNASSIGNED
Out of 90,298 patients, 90-day ED visits were identified for 10,701 (11.9%), with the greatest incidence in postoperative weeks 1-2. Readmissions were identified for 3,325 (3.7%) patients. Independent predictors of ED utilization included younger age (OR 1.25 per 10-year decrease, p<0.001), greater ECI score (OR 1.40 per 2-point increase, p<0.001), and insurance type (relative to Medicare, Medicaid [OR 2.15, p<0.001] and commercial plans [OR 1.14, p=0.004]). In postoperative weeks 1-2, 51% of primary ED diagnoses involved the surgical site, while 23% involved the surgical site in weeks 3-13. Compared to patients without ED visits, those who visited the ED had 65% greater mean 90-day reimbursement (p<0.001).
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
More than three times as many patients in the current study were found to present to the ED than be readmitted within ninety days of surgery. The identified predictive factors and reasons for ED visits can direct attention to high-risk patients and common postoperative issues. Additional postoperative counseling and integrated care pathways may reduce ED visits, thereby improving patient care and reducing healthcare spending.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35637647
doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100122
pii: S2666-5484(22)00025-7
pmc: PMC9144013
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100122

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : T35 AG049685
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None.

Références

Global Spine J. 2020 May;10(3):252-260
pubmed: 32313789
Spine J. 2018 Feb;18(2):226-233
pubmed: 28739479
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Aug;112(2):379-386
pubmed: 33310147
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Nov;33(9):E426-E433
pubmed: 32205517
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Aug 30;:1-9
pubmed: 31470402
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2019 May 23;11(2):7989
pubmed: 31210914
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Dec 2;97(23):1921-8
pubmed: 26631992
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Apr;32(3):113-119
pubmed: 30628923
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;34(3):357-65
pubmed: 26763823
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Mar 21;10(3):23259671221083586
pubmed: 35340726
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Dec;28(6):657-65
pubmed: 8953956
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Dec;142(6):1411-1420
pubmed: 30204678
J Orthop Surg Res. 2006 Sep 25;1:3
pubmed: 17150123
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):551-6
pubmed: 26245167
Popul Health Manag. 2017 Aug;20(4):271-277
pubmed: 28075692
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Feb;31(1):43-47
pubmed: 28079682
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):247-254
pubmed: 31659659
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Sep 1;45(17):1171-1177
pubmed: 32355143
Neurosurgery. 2019 Feb 1;84(2):485-490
pubmed: 29660020
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Jun 07;10:100
pubmed: 31528438
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2):255-259
pubmed: 30396744
Annu Rev Med. 2014;65:471-85
pubmed: 24160939
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1432-1439
pubmed: 29605899
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1575-1583.e1
pubmed: 32109576
World Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;141:e175-e181
pubmed: 32416237
Neurosurgery. 2019 Aug 1;85(2):E258-E265
pubmed: 30272232

Auteurs

Alexander J Kammien (AJ)

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

Anoop R Galivanche (AR)

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

Michael J Gouzoulis (MJ)

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

Harold G Moore (HG)

Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

Michael R Mercier (MR)

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

Jonathan N Grauer (JN)

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 47 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

Classifications MeSH