Differential Impact of Biologic Therapy on Heart Function Biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Observational Study on Etanercept, Adalimumab, and Tocilizumab.
Adalimumab
/ therapeutic use
Antibodies, Monoclonal
/ therapeutic use
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
Antirheumatic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
/ drug therapy
Biological Products
/ therapeutic use
Biological Therapy
Biomarkers
Etanercept
/ therapeutic use
Fatty Acid Binding Protein 3
Heart Injuries
/ drug therapy
Humans
Methotrexate
/ therapeutic use
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
H-FABP
Heart function
MR-proANP
NT-proBNP
biologics
galectin-3
rheumatoid arthritis
Journal
Current pharmaceutical design
ISSN: 1873-4286
Titre abrégé: Curr Pharm Des
Pays: United Arab Emirates
ID NLM: 9602487
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
21
01
2022
accepted:
30
03
2022
pubmed:
1
6
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
entrez:
31
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) represents the most frequent form of inflammatory arthritis, affecting approximately 1% of the population worldwide. The introduction of novel therapeutic strategies targeting proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and interleukin-6) revolutionized the treatment of RA. This kind of treatment, although effective in a substantial portion of patients, may potentially cause many side effects. Among them, cardiovascular safety is one of the main concerns. In the present study, we investigated the impact of treatment with anti-TNF-α and anti-IL-6 agents on heart function and levels of heart function biomarkers. To measure this, we used cardiac function biomarkers, such as NT-pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide, mid regional pro-Atrial Natriuretic Peptide, Galectin-3, and Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein and compared them to patients treated with methotrexate as well as healthy controls. Patients treated with biologics were characterized by low disease activity or were in remission. The disease activity in these groups was significantly lower than in the methotrexate group. All patients recruited for the study were characterized by normal heart function measured using echocardiography (EF>50%). With the exception of MR-proANP between tocilizumab and adalimumab (median: 1.01 vs. 0.49 nmol/L, p<0.05), we failed to observe any significant differences in biomarkers levels between groups treated with biologics. Contrary to this, patients on MTX showed higher NT-proBNP levels compared to adalimumab and healthy controls (p<0.05 for both). Striking differences have been shown in regard to H-FABP. The levels of these biomarkers were elevated in all biologics and the methotrexate group compared to healthy controls. As this biomarker reflects potential heart injury, we suggest that heart damage proceeds in a continuous manner in RA patients despite effective treatment and attainment of remission/low disease activity. This finding, however, should be verified in a larger cohort of RA patients to ascertain if the routine assessment of H-FABP may be useful for the detection of patients with RA who are at risk of development of heart damage.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) represents the most frequent form of inflammatory arthritis, affecting approximately 1% of the population worldwide. The introduction of novel therapeutic strategies targeting proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and interleukin-6) revolutionized the treatment of RA. This kind of treatment, although effective in a substantial portion of patients, may potentially cause many side effects. Among them, cardiovascular safety is one of the main concerns.
OBJECTIVES
In the present study, we investigated the impact of treatment with anti-TNF-α and anti-IL-6 agents on heart function and levels of heart function biomarkers.
METHODS
To measure this, we used cardiac function biomarkers, such as NT-pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide, mid regional pro-Atrial Natriuretic Peptide, Galectin-3, and Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein and compared them to patients treated with methotrexate as well as healthy controls.
RESULTS
Patients treated with biologics were characterized by low disease activity or were in remission. The disease activity in these groups was significantly lower than in the methotrexate group. All patients recruited for the study were characterized by normal heart function measured using echocardiography (EF>50%). With the exception of MR-proANP between tocilizumab and adalimumab (median: 1.01 vs. 0.49 nmol/L, p<0.05), we failed to observe any significant differences in biomarkers levels between groups treated with biologics. Contrary to this, patients on MTX showed higher NT-proBNP levels compared to adalimumab and healthy controls (p<0.05 for both). Striking differences have been shown in regard to H-FABP. The levels of these biomarkers were elevated in all biologics and the methotrexate group compared to healthy controls.
CONCLUSION
As this biomarker reflects potential heart injury, we suggest that heart damage proceeds in a continuous manner in RA patients despite effective treatment and attainment of remission/low disease activity. This finding, however, should be verified in a larger cohort of RA patients to ascertain if the routine assessment of H-FABP may be useful for the detection of patients with RA who are at risk of development of heart damage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35638285
pii: CPD-EPUB-124034
doi: 10.2174/1381612828666220527141532
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Biological Products
0
Biomarkers
0
Fatty Acid Binding Protein 3
0
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
0
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
0
Adalimumab
FYS6T7F842
tocilizumab
I031V2H011
Etanercept
OP401G7OJC
Methotrexate
YL5FZ2Y5U1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2029-2037Informations de copyright
Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.