Octacalcium Phosphate/Gelatin Composite (OCP/Gel) Enhances Bone Repair in a Critical-sized Transcortical Femoral Defect Rat Model.
Journal
Clinical orthopaedics and related research
ISSN: 1528-1132
Titre abrégé: Clin Orthop Relat Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0075674
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2022
01 10 2022
Historique:
received:
29
10
2021
accepted:
05
05
2022
pubmed:
1
6
2022
medline:
24
9
2022
entrez:
31
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bone grafting is widely used to treat large bone defects. A porous composite of a bioactive octacalcium phosphate material with gelatin sponge (OCP/Gel) has been shown to biodegrade promptly and be replaced with new bone both in animal models of a membranous bone defect and a long bone defect. However, it is unclear whether OCP/Gel can regenerate bone in more severe bone defects, such as a critical-size transcortical defect. Using an in vivo rat femur model of a standardized, transcortical, critical-size bone defect, we asked: Compared with a Gel control, does OCP/Gel result in more newly formed bone as determined by (1) micro-CT evaluation, (2) histologic and histomorphometric measures, and (3) osteocalcin staining and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining? Thirty-four 12-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats (weight 356 ± 25.6 g) were used. Gel and OCP/Gel composites were prepared in our laboratory. Porous cylinders 3 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height were manufactured from both materials. The OCP/Gel and Gel cylinders were implanted into a 3-mm-diameter transcortical critical-size bone defect model in the left rat femur. The OCP/Gel and Gel were randomly assigned, and the cylinders were implanted. The biological responses of the defect regions were evaluated radiologically and histologically. At 4 and 8 weeks after implantation, CT evaluation, histological examination of decalcified samples, and immunostaining were quantitatively performed to evaluate new bone formation and remaining bone graft substitutes and activity of osteoblasts and osteoclast-like cells (n = 24). Qualitative histological evaluation was performed on undecalcified samples at 3 weeks postimplantation (n = 10). CT and decalcified tissue analysis was not performed blinded, but an analysis of undecalcified specimens was performed under blinded conditions. Radiologic analysis revealed that the OCP/Gel group showed radiopaque regions around the OCP granules and at the edge of the defect margin 4 weeks after implantation, suggesting that new bone formation occurred in two ways. In contrast, the rat femurs in the Gel group had a limited radiopaque zone at the edge of the defect region. The amount of new bone volume analyzed by micro-CT was higher in the OCP/Gel group than in the Gel group at 4 and 8 weeks after implantation (4 weeks after implantation: OCP/Gel versus Gel: 6.1 ± 1.6 mm 3 versus 3.4 ± 0.7 mm 3 , mean difference 2.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9 to 4.5]; p = 0.002; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.72 [95% CI 0.29 to 0.91]; 8 weeks after implantation: OCP/Gel versus Gel: 3.9 ± 0.7 mm 3 versus 1.4 ± 1.1 mm 3 , mean difference 2.5 [95% CI 0.8 to 4.3]; p = 0.004; ICC 0.81 [95% CI 0.47 to 0.94]). Histologic evaluation also showed there was a higher percentage of new bone formation in the OCP/Gel group at 4 and 8 weeks after implantation (4 weeks after implantation: OCP/Gel versus Gel: 31.2% ± 5.3% versus 13.6% ± 4.0%, mean difference 17.6% [95% CI 14.2% to 29.2%]; p < 0.001; ICC 0.83 [95% CI 0.53 to 0.95]; 8 weeks after implantation: OCP/Gel versus Gel: 28.3% ± 6.2% versus 9.5% ± 1.9%, mean difference 18.8% [95% CI 11.3% to 26.3%]; p < 0.001; ICC 0.90 [95% CI 0.69 to 0.97]). Bridging of the defect area started earlier in the OCP/Gel group than in the Gel group at 4 weeks after implantation. Osteocalcin immunostaining showed that the number of mature osteoblasts was higher in the OCP/Gel group than in the Gel group at 4 weeks (OCP/Gel versus Gel: 42.1 ± 6.5/mm 2 versus 17.4 ± 5.4/mm 2 , mean difference 24.7 [95% CI 16.2 to 33.2]; p < 0.001; ICC 0.99 [95% CI 0.97 to 0.99]). At 4 weeks, the number of osteoclast-like cells was higher in the OCP/Gel composite group than in the Gel group (OCP/Gel versus Gel: 3.2 ± 0.6/mm 2 versus 0.9 ± 0.4/mm 2 , mean difference 2.3 [95% CI 1.3 to 3.5]; p < 0.001; ICC 0.79 [95% CI 0.35 to 0.94]). OCP/Gel composites induced early bone remodeling and cortical bone repair in less time than did the Gel control in a rat critical-size, transcortical femoral defect, suggesting that OCP/Gel could be used as a bone replacement material to treat severe bone defects. In a transcortical bone defect model of critical size in the rat femur, the OCP/Gel composite demonstrated successful bone regeneration. Several future studies are needed to evaluate the clinical application of this interesting bone graft substitute, including bone formation capacity in refractory fracture and spinal fusion models and the comparison of bone strength after repair with OCP/Gel composite to that of autologous bone.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Bone grafting is widely used to treat large bone defects. A porous composite of a bioactive octacalcium phosphate material with gelatin sponge (OCP/Gel) has been shown to biodegrade promptly and be replaced with new bone both in animal models of a membranous bone defect and a long bone defect. However, it is unclear whether OCP/Gel can regenerate bone in more severe bone defects, such as a critical-size transcortical defect.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES
Using an in vivo rat femur model of a standardized, transcortical, critical-size bone defect, we asked: Compared with a Gel control, does OCP/Gel result in more newly formed bone as determined by (1) micro-CT evaluation, (2) histologic and histomorphometric measures, and (3) osteocalcin staining and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining?
METHODS
Thirty-four 12-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats (weight 356 ± 25.6 g) were used. Gel and OCP/Gel composites were prepared in our laboratory. Porous cylinders 3 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height were manufactured from both materials. The OCP/Gel and Gel cylinders were implanted into a 3-mm-diameter transcortical critical-size bone defect model in the left rat femur. The OCP/Gel and Gel were randomly assigned, and the cylinders were implanted. The biological responses of the defect regions were evaluated radiologically and histologically. At 4 and 8 weeks after implantation, CT evaluation, histological examination of decalcified samples, and immunostaining were quantitatively performed to evaluate new bone formation and remaining bone graft substitutes and activity of osteoblasts and osteoclast-like cells (n = 24). Qualitative histological evaluation was performed on undecalcified samples at 3 weeks postimplantation (n = 10). CT and decalcified tissue analysis was not performed blinded, but an analysis of undecalcified specimens was performed under blinded conditions.
RESULTS
Radiologic analysis revealed that the OCP/Gel group showed radiopaque regions around the OCP granules and at the edge of the defect margin 4 weeks after implantation, suggesting that new bone formation occurred in two ways. In contrast, the rat femurs in the Gel group had a limited radiopaque zone at the edge of the defect region. The amount of new bone volume analyzed by micro-CT was higher in the OCP/Gel group than in the Gel group at 4 and 8 weeks after implantation (4 weeks after implantation: OCP/Gel versus Gel: 6.1 ± 1.6 mm 3 versus 3.4 ± 0.7 mm 3 , mean difference 2.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9 to 4.5]; p = 0.002; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.72 [95% CI 0.29 to 0.91]; 8 weeks after implantation: OCP/Gel versus Gel: 3.9 ± 0.7 mm 3 versus 1.4 ± 1.1 mm 3 , mean difference 2.5 [95% CI 0.8 to 4.3]; p = 0.004; ICC 0.81 [95% CI 0.47 to 0.94]). Histologic evaluation also showed there was a higher percentage of new bone formation in the OCP/Gel group at 4 and 8 weeks after implantation (4 weeks after implantation: OCP/Gel versus Gel: 31.2% ± 5.3% versus 13.6% ± 4.0%, mean difference 17.6% [95% CI 14.2% to 29.2%]; p < 0.001; ICC 0.83 [95% CI 0.53 to 0.95]; 8 weeks after implantation: OCP/Gel versus Gel: 28.3% ± 6.2% versus 9.5% ± 1.9%, mean difference 18.8% [95% CI 11.3% to 26.3%]; p < 0.001; ICC 0.90 [95% CI 0.69 to 0.97]). Bridging of the defect area started earlier in the OCP/Gel group than in the Gel group at 4 weeks after implantation. Osteocalcin immunostaining showed that the number of mature osteoblasts was higher in the OCP/Gel group than in the Gel group at 4 weeks (OCP/Gel versus Gel: 42.1 ± 6.5/mm 2 versus 17.4 ± 5.4/mm 2 , mean difference 24.7 [95% CI 16.2 to 33.2]; p < 0.001; ICC 0.99 [95% CI 0.97 to 0.99]). At 4 weeks, the number of osteoclast-like cells was higher in the OCP/Gel composite group than in the Gel group (OCP/Gel versus Gel: 3.2 ± 0.6/mm 2 versus 0.9 ± 0.4/mm 2 , mean difference 2.3 [95% CI 1.3 to 3.5]; p < 0.001; ICC 0.79 [95% CI 0.35 to 0.94]).
CONCLUSION
OCP/Gel composites induced early bone remodeling and cortical bone repair in less time than did the Gel control in a rat critical-size, transcortical femoral defect, suggesting that OCP/Gel could be used as a bone replacement material to treat severe bone defects.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
In a transcortical bone defect model of critical size in the rat femur, the OCP/Gel composite demonstrated successful bone regeneration. Several future studies are needed to evaluate the clinical application of this interesting bone graft substitute, including bone formation capacity in refractory fracture and spinal fusion models and the comparison of bone strength after repair with OCP/Gel composite to that of autologous bone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35638896
doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002257
pii: 00003086-202210000-00032
pmc: PMC9473763
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Substitutes
0
Calcium Phosphates
0
Osteocalcin
104982-03-8
octacalcium phosphate
13767-12-9
Gelatin
9000-70-8
Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase
EC 3.1.3.2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2043-2055Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
Références
Anada T, Kumagai T, Honda Y, et al. Dose-dependent osteogenic effect of octacalcium phosphate on mouse bone marrow stromal cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14:965-978.
Baba K, Shiwaku Y, Hamai R, et al. Chemical stability-sensitive osteoconductive performance of octacalcium phosphate bone substitute in an ovariectomized rat tibia defect. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2020;3:1444-1458.
Baldwin P, Li DJ, Auston DA, et al. Autograft, allograft, and bone graft substitutes: clinical evidence and indications for use in the setting of orthopaedic trauma surgery. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33:203-213.
Bohner M, Santoni BLG, Dobelin N. β-tricalcium phosphate for bone substitution: synthesis and properties. Acta Biomater. 2020;113:23-41.
Brown WE. Crystal growth of bone mineral. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1966;44:205-220.
Chiba S, Anada T, Suzuki K, et al. Effect of resorption rate and osteoconductivity of biodegradable calcium phosphate materials on the acquisition of natural bone strength in the repaired bone. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104:2833-2842.
Ezoe Y, Anada T, Yamazaki H, et al. Characterization of partially hydrolyzed OCP crystals deposited in a gelatin matrix as a scaffold for bone tissue engineering. J Nanopart Res. 2015;17:127.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175-191.
Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury. 2005;36(suppl 3):S20-27.
Habraken W, Habibovic P, Epple M, et al. Calcium phosphates in biomedical applications: materials for the future? Materials Today. 2016;19:69-87.
Hamai R, Sakai S, Shiwaku Y, et al. Octacalcium phosphate crystals including a higher density dislocation improve its materials osteogenecity. Appl Mater Today. 2022;26:101279.
Handa T, Anada T, Honda Y, et al. The effect of an octacalcium phosphate co-precipitated gelatin composite on the repair of critical-sized rat calvarial defects. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:1190-1200.
Hirayama B, Anada T, Shiwaku Y, et al. Immune cell response and subsequent bone formation induced by implantation of octacalcium phosphate in a rat tibia defect. RSC Adv. 2016;6:57475-57484.
Honda Y, Kamakura S, Sasaki K, et al. Formation of bone-like apatite enhanced by hydrolysis of octacalcium phosphate crystals deposited in collagen matrix. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;80:281-289.
Imaizumi H, Sakurai M, Kashimoto O, et al. Comparative study on osteoconductivity by synthetic octacalcium phosphate and sintered hydroxyapatite in rabbit bone marrow. Calcif Tissue Int. 2006;78:45-54.
Ishiko-Uzuka R, Anada T, Kobayashi K, et al. Oriented bone regenerative capacity of octacalcium phosphate/gelatin composites obtained through two-step crystal preparation method. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017;105:1029-1039.
Kawai T, Kamakura S, Matsui K, et al. Clinical study of octacalcium phosphate and collagen composite in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Tissue Eng. 2020;11:1-15.
Kikawa T, Kashimoto O, Imaizumi H, et al. Intramembranous bone tissue response to biodegradable octacalcium phosphate implant. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:1756-1766.
Kinaci A, Neuhaus V, Ring DC. Trends in bone graft use in the United States. Orthopedics. 2014;37:e783-788.
Kunii T, Mori Y, Tanaka H, et al. Improved osseointegration of a TiNbSn alloy with a low Young’s modulus treated with anodic oxidation. Sci Rep. 2019;9:13985.
Kurobane T, Shiwaku Y, Anada T, et al. Angiogenesis involvement by octacalcium phosphate-gelatin composite-driven bone regeneration in rat calvaria critical-sized defect. Acta Biomater. 2019;88:514-526.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
Laurencin C, Khan Y, El-Amin SF. Bone graft substitutes. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006;3:49-57.
Leiblein M, Koch E, Winkenbach A, et al. Size matters: effect of granule size of the bone graft substitute (Herafill®) on bone healing using Masquelet's induced membrane in a critical size defect model in the rat's femur. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020;108:1469-1482.
Ma Z, Gao C, Gong Y, et al. Immobilization of natural macromolecules on poly-L-lactic acid membrane surface in order to improve its cytocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:838-847.
McAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol. 2007;78:377-396.
Miyatake N, Kishimoto KN, Anada T, et al. Effect of partial hydrolysis of octacalcium phosphate on its osteoconductive characteristics. Biomaterials. 2009;30:1005-1014.
Murakami Y, Honda Y, Anada T, et al. Comparative study on bone regeneration by synthetic octacalcium phosphate with various granule sizes. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:1542-1548.
Nau C, Simon S, Schaible A, et al. Influence of the induced membrane filled with syngeneic bone and regenerative cells on bone healing in a critical size defect model of the rat's femur. Injury. 2018;49:1721-1731.
Oizumi I, Hamai R, Shiwaku Y, et al. Impact of simultaneous hydrolysis of OCP and PLGA on bone induction of a PLGA-OCP composite scaffold in a rat femoral defect. Acta Biomater. 2021;124:358-373.
Rai B, Oest ME, Dupont KM, et al. Combination of platelet-rich plasma with polycaprolactone-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for segmental bone defect repair. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;81:888-899.
Saito K, Anada T, Shiwaku Y, et al. Dose-dependent enhancement of octacalcium phosphate biodegradation with a gelatin matrix during bone regeneration in a rabbit tibial defect model. RSC Adv. 2016;6:64165-64174.
Schemitsch EH. Size matters: defining critical in bone defect size! J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(suppl 5):S20-S22.
Shiwaku Y, Tsuchiya K, Xiao L, et al. Effect of calcium phosphate phases affecting the crosstalk between osteoblasts and osteoclasts in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2019;107:1001-1013.
Singh R, Singh D, Singh A. Radiation sterilization of tissue allografts: a review. World J Radiol. 2016;8:355-369.
Suzuki O. Octacalcium phosphate: osteoconductivity and crystal chemistry. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3379-3387.
Suzuki O, Kamakura S, Katagiri T. Surface chemistry and biological responses to synthetic octacalcium phosphate. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;77:201-212.
Suzuki O, Kamakura S, Katagiri T, et al. Bone formation enhanced by implanted octacalcium phosphate involving conversion into Ca-deficient hydroxyapatite. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2671-2681.
Suzuki O, Nakamura M, Miyasaka Y, et al. Bone formation on synthetic precursors of hydroxyapatite. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1991;164:37-50.
Suzuki O, Nakamura M, Miyasaka Y, et al. Maclura pomifera agglutinin-binding glycoconjugates on converted apatite from synthetic octacalcium phosphate implanted into subperiosteal region of mouse calvaria. Bone Miner. 1993;20:151-166.
Tabata Y. Tissue regeneration based on growth factor release. Tissue Eng. 2003;9:S5-S15.
Takahashi Y, Yamamoto M, Tabata Y. Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in biodegradable sponges composed of gelatin and beta-tricalcium phosphate. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3587-3596.
Takami M, Mochizuki A, Yamada A, et al. Osteoclast differentiation induced by synthetic octacalcium phosphate through receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand expression in osteoblasts. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15:3991-4000.
Tanaka H, Mori Y, Noro A, et al. Apatite formation and biocompatibility of a low Young’s modulus Ti-Nb-Sn alloy treated with anodic oxidation and hot water. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150081.
Veis A, Cohen J. Reversible transformation of gelatin to the collagen structure. Nature. 1960;186:720-721.