Evaluation of auditory pathway by EABR before cochlear implantation and the postoperative effect analysis.
Cochlear implant
Cochlear nerve deficiency
Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response
Hearing rehabilitation
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
10
12
2021
accepted:
18
05
2022
pubmed:
1
6
2022
medline:
7
1
2023
entrez:
31
5
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the evaluation value of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) monitoring before cochlear implantation in patients with cochlear nerve defects (CND). A total of 54 patients with cochlear nerve defects who underwent cochlear implantation in our hospital from 2011 to 2018 were selected as the CND group, and 20 patients with normal cochlear implantation were selected as the control group. The preoperative audiological characteristics, EABR characteristics and follow-up neural response telemetry results of the two groups were retrospectively analysed, and the preoperative EABR threshold and initiation C value were subjected to linear regression and correlation analysis. The EABR waveform of the CND group was significantly different from the control group in terms of average wave V threshold, average dynamic range and V-wave I/O curve slope (P < 0.05). Average C value and dynamic range had a statistically significant difference from the control group (P < 0.05). Statistically significant positive correlations were found between the EABR threshold and C value, wave V I/O slope and postoperative category of auditory perception (P < 0.05). The EABR test can be used to evaluate the auditory pathway function before cochlear implantation and its postoperative effect in patients with CND.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35639140
doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07458-9
pii: 10.1007/s00405-022-07458-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105-114Subventions
Organisme : Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission Capital Clinical Research
ID : No.Z171100001017218
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Morlet T, Pazuniak M, O’Reilly RC, Kandula V, Choudhary AK (2017) Cochlear nerve deficiency and brain abnormalities in pediatric patients. Otol Neurotol 38(3):429–440. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001308 (PMID: 28060175)
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001308
Thompson MR, Birman CS (2019) Bilateral duplication of the internal auditory canals and bilateral cochlear implant outcomes and review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 119:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.01.015 (Epub 2019 Jan 12 PMID: 30665175)
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.01.015
Orzan E, Pizzamiglio G, Gregori M, Marchi R, Torelli L, Muzzi E (2021) Correlation of cochlear aperture stenosis with cochlear nerve deficiency in congenital unilateral hearing loss and prognostic relevance for cochlear implantation. Sci Rep 11(1):3338. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82818-9 (PMID:33558599; PMCID:PMC7870947)
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82818-9
Wang B, Cao K, Wei C, Gao Z, Li H (2019) Evaluating auditory pathway by electrical auditory middle latency response and postoperative hearing rehabilitation. J Invest Surg 32(6):542–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2018.1443175 (Epub 2018 Mar 14; PMID: 29537890)
doi: 10.1080/08941939.2018.1443175
Huang YY, Cheng L, Yang J, Huang Q, Shen M, Chen JY (2019) Preoperative imaging and electrophysiological evaluation of cochlear implantation in children with cochlear nerve dysplasia. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 33(8):729–735. https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.219.08.012 (Chinese. PMID: 31446728)
doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.219.08.012
Gibson WP, Sanli H, Psarros C (2009) The use of intraoperative electrical auditory brainstem response to predict the speech perception outcome after cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int 10(Suppl 1):53–57
doi: 10.1179/cim.2009.10.Supplement-1.53
Glastonbury CM, Davidson HC, Harnsberger HR, Butler J, Kertesz TR, Shelton C (2002) Imaging findings of cochlear nerve deficiency. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23(4):635–643 (PMID: 11950658; PMCID: PMC7975095)
Archbold SLME, Nikolopoulos T (1998) Categories of auditory performance: inter-user reliability. Br J Audiol 32(1):7–12
doi: 10.3109/03005364000000045
Pfingst BE, Hughes AP, Colesa DJ (2015) Insertion trauma and recovery of function after cochlear implantation: evidence from objective functional measures. Hear Res 330(Pt A):98–105
doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.07.010
Nikolopoulos TP, Mason SM, O’Donoghue GM, Gibbin KP (1997) Electric auditory brain stem response in pediatric patients with cochlear implants. Am J Otol 18(6 Suppl):S120–S121 (PMID: 9391627)
Li X, Wen LT, Gao L, Qiu JH (2012) Analysis of the change of electrode impedance and T/C value of Nucleus24CA type cochlear implant after implantation. Chin J Ear Sci 10(1):19–22
Song MH, Bae MR, Kim HN, Lee WS, Yang WS, Choi JY (2010) Value of intracochlear electrically evoked auditory brainstem response after cochlear implantation in patients with narrow internal auditory canal. Laryngoscope 120(8):1625–1631. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21008 (PMID: 20564653)
doi: 10.1002/lary.21008
Erb J, Ludwig AA, Kunke D, Fuchs M, Obleser J (2019) Temporal sensitivity measured shortly after cochlear implantation predicts 6-month speech recognition outcome. Ear Hear 40(1):27–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000588 (PMID: 29697465)
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000588
Vincenti V, Bacciu A, Guida M, Marra F, Bertoldi B, Bacciu S, Pasanisi E (2014) Pediatric cochlear implantation: an update. Ital J Pediatr 2(40):72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-014-0072-8.PMID:25179127;PMCID:PMC4282008
doi: 10.1186/s13052-014-0072-8.PMID:25179127;PMCID:PMC4282008
Blamey P (1997) Are spiral ganglion cell numbers important for speech perception with a cochlear implant. Am J Otol 18(6 suppl):s11–s12
Ahn JH, Lim HW, Lee KS (2011) Hearing improvement after cochlear implantation in common cavity malformed cochleae: long-term follow-up results. Acta Otolaryngol 131(9):908–913. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2011.570786 (Epub 2011 May 2; PMID: 21534716)
doi: 10.3109/00016489.2011.570786