Early


Journal

Anticancer research
ISSN: 1791-7530
Titre abrégé: Anticancer Res
Pays: Greece
ID NLM: 8102988

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 07 04 2022
revised: 09 05 2022
accepted: 13 05 2022
entrez: 31 5 2022
pubmed: 1 6 2022
medline: 3 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A much-debated topic relating to patients at risk of local prostate cancer recurrence, but with post-operative leveIs of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) lower than 0.2 ng/ml, concerns the best timing of postoperative radiotherapy (RT), adjuvant or salvage? The present monocentric, retrospective study aimed to investigate the best PSA value at which to plan salvage RT for patients with recurrent prostate cancer. From January 2011 to December 2019, 158 patients were treated with adjuvant RT at Pisa University Hospital, whilst 91 patients underwent salvage RT. We grouped the patients treated with salvage RT using their PSA values at the time of salvage RT: PSA >0.5 ng/ml, PSA between 0 and 0.5 ng/ml, and PSA ≤0.2 ng/ml. The median follow-up was 63 months. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BFS) measured from surgery was the primary endpoint. Salvage RT led to shorter BFS compared to adjuvant RT considering the whole cohort of patients, with a hazard ratio of 3.195 (95% confidence interval=1.534-6.655, p=0.002). However, analysing only the group of patients with PSA ≤0.2 ng/ml at the time of salvage RT, salvage RT led to BFS similar to that achieved with adjuvant RT (p=0.35). Our results suggest that when scheduled for patients with a PSA ≤0.2 ng/ml, salvage RT results in equivalent biochemical control to that with adjuvant RT.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/AIM OBJECTIVE
A much-debated topic relating to patients at risk of local prostate cancer recurrence, but with post-operative leveIs of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) lower than 0.2 ng/ml, concerns the best timing of postoperative radiotherapy (RT), adjuvant or salvage? The present monocentric, retrospective study aimed to investigate the best PSA value at which to plan salvage RT for patients with recurrent prostate cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
From January 2011 to December 2019, 158 patients were treated with adjuvant RT at Pisa University Hospital, whilst 91 patients underwent salvage RT. We grouped the patients treated with salvage RT using their PSA values at the time of salvage RT: PSA >0.5 ng/ml, PSA between 0 and 0.5 ng/ml, and PSA ≤0.2 ng/ml. The median follow-up was 63 months. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BFS) measured from surgery was the primary endpoint.
RESULTS RESULTS
Salvage RT led to shorter BFS compared to adjuvant RT considering the whole cohort of patients, with a hazard ratio of 3.195 (95% confidence interval=1.534-6.655, p=0.002). However, analysing only the group of patients with PSA ≤0.2 ng/ml at the time of salvage RT, salvage RT led to BFS similar to that achieved with adjuvant RT (p=0.35).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that when scheduled for patients with a PSA ≤0.2 ng/ml, salvage RT results in equivalent biochemical control to that with adjuvant RT.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35641255
pii: 42/6/2997
doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15783
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2997-3001

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Francesco Pasqualetti (F)

Radiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy; f.pasqualetti@ao-pisa.toscana.it francesco.pasqualetti@oncology.ox.ac.uk.

Elisa Calistri (E)

Radiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.

Taiusha Fuentes (T)

Radiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.

Aldo Sainato (A)

Radiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.

Bruno Manfredi (B)

Radiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.

Riccardo Morganti (R)

Department of Statistics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Luca Galli (L)

Oncology Unit 2, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Chiara Mercinelli (C)

Oncology Unit 2, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Enrico Sammarco (E)

Oncology Unit 2, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Davide Baldaccini (D)

Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Gabriele Coraggio (G)

University Hospital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France.

Marco Panichi (M)

Institute of Advanced Oncology (IOA), Atrys-Sanitas, Barcelona, Spain.

Paola Anna Erba (PA)

Nuclear Medicine, Department of Translational Research and Advanced Technology in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.

Fabiola Paiar (F)

Radiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH