A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials on the Efficacy and Safety of Pitavastatin.


Journal

Current reviews in clinical and experimental pharmacology
ISSN: 2772-4336
Titre abrégé: Curr Rev Clin Exp Pharmacol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9918227368306676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 02 09 2021
revised: 12 02 2022
accepted: 18 03 2022
pubmed: 2 6 2022
medline: 11 3 2023
entrez: 1 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A subpopulation of statin users such as subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD), Human Immune virus (HIV), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), revascularization, metabolic syndrome, and/or diabetes may particularly benefit from pitavastatin pharmacotherapy. The current systematic review aimed systematically to evaluate the effect of pitavastatin on primary cardiac events in subjects receiving pitavastatin in comparison to the other four statin members. We conducted a systematic review on phases III and IV of randomized controlled trials (RCT-s, 11 trials) for subjects with primary cardiac events who received pitavastatin. Subjects diagnosed with any type of dyslipidemia (population 4804) and received pitavastatin (interventions) versus comparator (comparison) with the primary efficacy endpoint of minimization of LDL-C and non- HDL-C, had an increase in HDL-C and/or reduction in major adverse cardiac events (MACE, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (fatal/nonfatal), and stroke (fatal/nonfatal) and/or their composite (outcomes). The secondary safety endpoint was the development of any adverse effects. In the included trials (11), participants (4804) were randomized for pitavastatin or its comparators such as atorvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin and followed up for 12 to 52 weeks. In terms of the primary outcome (reduction in LDL-C), pitavastatin 4 mg was superior to pravastatin 40 mg in three trials, while the 2 mg pitavastatin was comparable to atorvastatin 10 mg in four trials and simvastatin 20 and 40 mg in two 2 trials. However, rosuvastatin 2.5 mg was superior to pitavastatin 2 mg in two trials. Pitavastatin increased HDL-C and reduced non-HDL-C in eleven trials. Regarding the safety profile, pitavastatin has proved to be tolerated and safe. The FDA-approved indications for pitavastatin included primary dyslipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia as a supplementary therapy to dietary changes to lower total cholesterol, LDL-C, apolipoprotein B (Apo B), triglycerides (TG), and enhance HDL-C. Pitavastatin might be suitable for subjects with diabetes, ACS (reduced revascularization), metabolic syndrome, CKD, HIV, and subjects with low levels of HDL-C. We highly recommend rational individualization for the selection of statin.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
A subpopulation of statin users such as subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD), Human Immune virus (HIV), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), revascularization, metabolic syndrome, and/or diabetes may particularly benefit from pitavastatin pharmacotherapy.
AIM
The current systematic review aimed systematically to evaluate the effect of pitavastatin on primary cardiac events in subjects receiving pitavastatin in comparison to the other four statin members.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review on phases III and IV of randomized controlled trials (RCT-s, 11 trials) for subjects with primary cardiac events who received pitavastatin. Subjects diagnosed with any type of dyslipidemia (population 4804) and received pitavastatin (interventions) versus comparator (comparison) with the primary efficacy endpoint of minimization of LDL-C and non- HDL-C, had an increase in HDL-C and/or reduction in major adverse cardiac events (MACE, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (fatal/nonfatal), and stroke (fatal/nonfatal) and/or their composite (outcomes). The secondary safety endpoint was the development of any adverse effects.
RESULTS
In the included trials (11), participants (4804) were randomized for pitavastatin or its comparators such as atorvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin and followed up for 12 to 52 weeks. In terms of the primary outcome (reduction in LDL-C), pitavastatin 4 mg was superior to pravastatin 40 mg in three trials, while the 2 mg pitavastatin was comparable to atorvastatin 10 mg in four trials and simvastatin 20 and 40 mg in two 2 trials. However, rosuvastatin 2.5 mg was superior to pitavastatin 2 mg in two trials. Pitavastatin increased HDL-C and reduced non-HDL-C in eleven trials. Regarding the safety profile, pitavastatin has proved to be tolerated and safe.
CONCLUSION
The FDA-approved indications for pitavastatin included primary dyslipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia as a supplementary therapy to dietary changes to lower total cholesterol, LDL-C, apolipoprotein B (Apo B), triglycerides (TG), and enhance HDL-C. Pitavastatin might be suitable for subjects with diabetes, ACS (reduced revascularization), metabolic syndrome, CKD, HIV, and subjects with low levels of HDL-C. We highly recommend rational individualization for the selection of statin.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35642121
pii: CRCEP-EPUB-124084
doi: 10.2174/2772432817666220531115314
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors 0
Atorvastatin A0JWA85V8F
Rosuvastatin Calcium 83MVU38M7Q
Pravastatin KXO2KT9N0G
pitavastatin M5681Q5F9P
Cholesterol, LDL 0
Cholesterol, HDL 0
Simvastatin AGG2FN16EV

Types de publication

Systematic Review Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

120-147

Informations de copyright

Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.

Auteurs

Adel Sadeq (A)

Program of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Al Ain, UAE.

Asim Ahmed Elnour (AA)

Program of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi campus, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
AAU Health and Biomedical Research Centre, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, UAE.

Farah Hamad Farah (FH)

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Center of Medical and Bio-allied Health Sciences Research, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE.

Azza Ramadan (A)

Program of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi Campus, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Mohamed A Baraka (MA)

Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Al Ain campus, United Arab Emirates.
Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Judit Don (J)

College of Pharmacy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE.

Abdulla Al Amoodi (AA)

Ambulatory Healthcare Services, Academic Affairs, Abu Dhabi Health Services (SEHA), UAE.

Kishore Gnana Sam (KG)

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapeutics, Dubai College of Pharmacy, Dubai, UAE.

Nadia Al Mazrouei (NA)

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

Maisoun Alkaabi (M)

New Medical Center Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH