Stereotactic Radiation for the Comprehensive Treatment of Oligometastases (SABR-COMET): Extended Long-Term Outcomes.


Journal

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 11 2022
Historique:
received: 14 03 2022
revised: 03 05 2022
accepted: 04 05 2022
pubmed: 2 6 2022
medline: 19 10 2022
entrez: 1 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Long-term randomized data assessing the effect of ablative therapies in patients with oligometastases are lacking. The Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Comprehensive Treatment of Oligometastases (SABR-COMET) randomized phase 2 trial was originally designed with 5 years of follow-up, but the trial was amended in 2016 to extend follow-up to 10 years. Herein we report oncologic outcomes beyond 5 years. Patients were eligible if they had a controlled primary tumor and 1 to 5 metastases, with all metastases amenable to SABR. Patients were randomized in a 1:2 ratio between palliative standard-of-care treatment (control arm) versus SABR to all metastases plus standard of care (SABR arm). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, quality of life (using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General [FACT-G]), and time to new metastases. Ninety-nine patients were randomized between 2012 and 2016 (n = 33 in arm 1 vs n = 66 in arm 2). Primary tumor sites included lung (n = 18), breast (n = 18), colon (n = 18), prostate (n = 16), and other (n = 29). Eight-year OS was 27.2% in the SABR arm versus 13.6% in the control arm (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.84; P = .008). Eight-year PFS estimates were 21.3% versus 0.0%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.72; P < .001). Rates of grade ≥ 2 acute or late toxic effects were 30.3% versus 9.1% (P = .019), with no new grade 3 to 5 toxic effects. FACT-G quality of life scores declined over time in both arms, but there were no differences in quality of life scores between arms. The use of systemic therapy overall was similar between arms, but patients in the SABR arm were less likely to require cytotoxic chemotherapy (33.3% vs 54.6%, respectively, P = .043). SABR achieved durable improvements in OS and PFS, with no new major toxicity signals with extended follow-up. A minority of patients randomized to the SABR arm (21.3%) achieved > 5 years of survival without recurrence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35643253
pii: S0360-3016(22)00412-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

611-616

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Stephen Harrow (S)

Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Edinburgh, Scotland.

David A Palma (DA)

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: david.palma@lhsc.on.ca.

Robert Olson (R)

BC Cancer - Centre for the North, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.

Stewart Gaede (S)

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Alexander V Louie (AV)

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Cornelis Haasbeek (C)

Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Liam Mulroy (L)

Nova Scotia Cancer Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Michael Lock (M)

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

George B Rodrigues (GB)

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Brian P Yaremko (BP)

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Devin Schellenberg (D)

BC Cancer - Surrey Centre, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada.

Belal Ahmad (B)

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Sashendra Senthi (S)

Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Anand Swaminath (A)

Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Neil Kopek (N)

McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Mitchell Liu (M)

BC Cancer - Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Roel Schlijper (R)

BC Cancer - Centre for the North, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.

Glenn S Bauman (GS)

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Joanna Laba (J)

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

X Melody Qu (XM)

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Andrew Warner (A)

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

Suresh Senan (S)

Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH