Pitch-Luminance Crossmodal Correspondence in the Baby Chick: An Investigation on Predisposed and Learned Processes.
auditory pitch
comparative cognition
crossmodal correspondences
domestic chicks
luminance
Journal
Vision (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2411-5150
Titre abrégé: Vision (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101733282
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Apr 2022
28 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
07
03
2022
revised:
20
04
2022
accepted:
25
04
2022
entrez:
1
6
2022
pubmed:
2
6
2022
medline:
2
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Our senses are constantly reached by a multitude of stimuli from all different sensory modalities. To create a coherent representation of the environment, we must integrate the various unimodal inputs that refer to the same object into a single multimodal representation. In some cases, however, we tend to bind certain properties of the stimuli without any apparent reason, which is a phenomenon named crossmodal correspondence. For instance, we match a spiky or a rounded shape with the sound "Kiki" or "Bouba", respectively. Similarly, we associate the left hemispace with low luminance and the right one with high luminance. Instances of crossmodal correspondences were described also in other mammals, and recently, a case of space-luminance crossmodal correspondence was reported in birds (i.e., domestic chicks). Here, we investigate the presence of pitch-luminance crossmodal correspondence in three-day-old chicks, employing experimental methods that exploit either predisposed or learned processes. While failing to report evidence for this phenomenon, we discuss the difference between statistical and structural crossmodal correspondences and the possible role of environmental factors in determining their emergence. Moreover, we discuss the importance of the different experimental methodologies to investigate distinct aspects of this perceptual phenomenon to reach a deeper understanding and unveil the role of innate vs. learned mechanisms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35645378
pii: vision6020024
doi: 10.3390/vision6020024
pmc: PMC9149823
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Iperception. 2012;3(5):316-8
pubmed: 23145286
Am J Psychol. 1974 Mar-Jun;87(1-2):173-88
pubmed: 4451203
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):165-72
pubmed: 23121711
Neuropsychologia. 1998 Jan;36(1):51-8
pubmed: 9533387
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011 Mar;95(3):231-8
pubmed: 21111840
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 20;108(51):20661-5
pubmed: 22143791
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jan;21(1):21-5
pubmed: 20424017
J Comp Psychol. 1990 Dec;104(4):361-7
pubmed: 2282785
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 Sep;133:13-18
pubmed: 27246250
Curr Biol. 2005 May 24;15(10):R372-3
pubmed: 15916935
Laterality. 2021 Jan-Mar;26(1-2):1-18
pubmed: 32698726
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec;23(6):439-445
pubmed: 26166955
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Feb 9;9(2):211647
pubmed: 35154798
Behav Brain Res. 1997 Sep;87(2):173-82
pubmed: 9331485
Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):136-41
pubmed: 15010245
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 May;73(4):971-95
pubmed: 21264748
Biol Lett. 2019 Nov 29;15(11):20190564
pubmed: 31718513
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2010;5:1-22
pubmed: 21359131
Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jul 1;162(1):62-70
pubmed: 15885818
Percept Psychophys. 2006 Oct;68(7):1191-203
pubmed: 17355042
Behav Processes. 2017 Jan;134:22-30
pubmed: 27397575
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999 Aug;30(2):164-75
pubmed: 10525173
Dev Sci. 2016 May;19(3):394-401
pubmed: 26074348
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Oct;174(3):588-94
pubmed: 16900363
Annu Rev Linguist. 2019 Jan;5(1):49-66
pubmed: 34307767
Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Mar;2(1):34-46
pubmed: 24168422
Behav Brain Res. 2015 May 15;285:118-30
pubmed: 25286314
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:111-39
pubmed: 11148301
Chem Senses. 2013 Feb;38(2):161-6
pubmed: 23118203
Vision Res. 2021 Nov;188:26-31
pubmed: 34280814
Science. 2015 Jan 30;347(6221):534-6
pubmed: 25635096
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987 Aug;13(3):384-94
pubmed: 2958587
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Apr;76(3):759-65
pubmed: 24402699
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):352-369
pubmed: 27488555
Behav Neurosci. 2009 Aug;123(4):822-7
pubmed: 19634941