Computational Process of Sharing Emotion: An Authentic Information Perspective.

MPT model authenticity emotion facial expressions sharing emotion

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 06 01 2022
accepted: 26 04 2022
entrez: 1 6 2022
pubmed: 2 6 2022
medline: 2 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although results of many psychology studies have shown that sharing emotion achieves dyadic interaction, no report has explained a study of the transmission of authentic information from emotional expressions that can strengthen perceivers. For this study, we used computational modeling, which is a multinomial processing tree, for formal quantification of the process of sharing emotion that emphasizes the perception of authentic information for expressers' feeling states from facial expressions. Results indicated that the ability to perceive authentic information of feeling states from a happy expression has a higher probability than the probability of judging authentic information from anger expressions. Next, happy facial expressions can activate both emotional elicitation and sharing emotion in perceivers, where emotional elicitation alone is working rather than sharing emotion for angry facial expressions. Third, parameters to detect anger experiences were found to be correlated positively with those of happiness. No robust correlation was found between the parameters extracted from this experiment task and questionnaire-measured emotional contagion, empathy, and social anxiety. Results of this study revealed the possibility that a new computational approach contributes to description of emotion sharing processes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35645906
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849499
pmc: PMC9134197
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

849499

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Namba, Sato, Nakamura and Watanabe.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Mar;20(3):227-240
pubmed: 26876363
Cortex. 2021 Aug;141:280-292
pubmed: 34102411
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 11;9(6):e99194
pubmed: 24918939
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1539-1562
pubmed: 27928745
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Mar 18;7:6
pubmed: 23508036
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Mar;6(1):57-86
pubmed: 12199315
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):388-407
pubmed: 31016684
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000 Mar;104(1):1-15
pubmed: 10769936
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Nov;71(11):2355-2363
pubmed: 30362411
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 10;9:1184
pubmed: 30042717
Behav Res Ther. 1998 Apr;36(4):455-70
pubmed: 9670605
Brain Cogn. 2013 Mar;81(2):237-46
pubmed: 23262178
Emotion. 2011 Feb;11(1):181-7
pubmed: 21401238
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 31;11:52
pubmed: 32082220
Psychol Methods. 2018 Dec;23(4):774-799
pubmed: 29595295
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 23;13(10):e0205738
pubmed: 30352063
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 14;8:378
pubmed: 28382006
Emotion. 2019 Dec;19(8):1490-1494
pubmed: 30265074
Emotion. 2004 Jun;4(2):189-200
pubmed: 15222855
Emotion. 2009 Apr;9(2):260-4
pubmed: 19348537
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):655-664
pubmed: 27762574
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Jan;25(1):246-57
pubmed: 23968840
Emotion. 2017 Apr;17(3):395-411
pubmed: 28080083
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2017 Apr;88(1):61-71
pubmed: 29630312
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 11;6:1122
pubmed: 26321970
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Mar 1;27(3):1878-1890
pubmed: 26908633
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 12;9(3):e90315
pubmed: 24621792
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 20;21(12):
pubmed: 34203007
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 28;8(6):e67371
pubmed: 23840683
Cogn Emot. 2019 Nov;33(7):1342-1355
pubmed: 30585120
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2013 May;17(2):142-57
pubmed: 23348982
Psychol Methods. 2014 Dec;19(4):528-41
pubmed: 24773355
Int J Psychophysiol. 2001 Mar;40(2):129-41
pubmed: 11165351
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Dec;37(12):1551-63
pubmed: 21778468
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Dec;33(6):417-33; discussion 433-80
pubmed: 21211115
Front Psychol. 2018 May 29;9:672
pubmed: 29896135
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 23;7:1853
pubmed: 27933022
Curr Biol. 2014 Jan 20;24(2):187-192
pubmed: 24388852
Psychol Assess. 2018 Dec;30(12):1703-1708
pubmed: 30035555
Psychophysiology. 2021 Jan;58(1):e13675
pubmed: 32915999
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 27;10:701
pubmed: 30971997
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 17;111(24):8788-90
pubmed: 24889601
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57889
pubmed: 23536774
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 04;8:2278
pubmed: 29354087
Cogn Emot. 2019 Nov;33(7):1481-1488
pubmed: 30569822

Auteurs

Shushi Namba (S)

Psychological Process Research Team, Guardian Robot Project, RIKEN, Kyoto, Japan.

Wataru Sato (W)

Psychological Process Research Team, Guardian Robot Project, RIKEN, Kyoto, Japan.

Koyo Nakamura (K)

Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.

Katsumi Watanabe (K)

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Classifications MeSH